Re: Question about email received

2021-12-31 Thread Charles Curley
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:33:03 +0100 Julius Hamilton wrote: > Google would never intentionally send an email like that. Of course they wouldn't send you an email like that. They have much better ways of snooping information about you. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescur

Re: Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread Keith Bainbridge
On 31/12/21 12:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:33:03 AM Julius Hamilton wrote: Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it. Google would never intentionally send an email like that. +1 Who would subscribe with a 'noreply' type a

Re: Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:33:03 AM Julius Hamilton wrote: > Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it. > Google would never intentionally send an email like that. +1

Re: Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread Julius Hamilton
Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it. Google would never intentionally send an email like that. Best, Julius On Thu 30. Dec 2021 at 17:29, wrote: > Hello I received from nore...@google.com the following email in Czech > (that I translated in english): > > "A

Question about email received

2021-12-30 Thread frantal
Hello I received from nore...@google.com mailto:nore...@google.com the following email in Czech (that I translated in english): "And the value-added tax issuance ①③O③⑦②⑨③O①⑥The emblem is synchronized and regular and can be checked. And the invoice emblem is synchronized and regular and can be c