On Du, 07 dec 14, 18:51:53, David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 07 December 2014 13:30:35 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 07 dec 14, 12:52:06, David Baron wrote:
>
> > > 2. 1.18 has been the current intramf-tools version for quite a while and
> > > several serious or worse bugs are open.
> >
> > And
David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 07 December 2014 13:30:35 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Du, 07 dec 14, 12:52:06, David Baron wrote:
>>> 2. 1.18 has been the current intramf-tools version for quite a while
>>> and several serious or worse bugs are open.
>>
>> And the question is?
> Is 1.18 safe to
On Sunday 07 December 2014 13:30:35 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 07 dec 14, 12:52:06, David Baron wrote:
> > 1. I noticed that several of these are listed as deprecated. What replaces
> > them or are they used at all? (Do not want to risk and unbootable, or
> > unloginable [SIC] system by simply
On Du, 07 dec 14, 12:52:06, David Baron wrote:
> 1. I noticed that several of these are listed as deprecated. What replaces
> them or are they used at all? (Do not want to risk and unbootable, or
> unloginable [SIC] system by simply removing them :-)
I'm guessing you mean libsystemd-daemon0, lib
1. I noticed that several of these are listed as deprecated. What replaces
them or are they used at all? (Do not want to risk and unbootable, or
unloginable [SIC] system by simply removing them :-)
2. 1.18 has been the current intramf-tools version for quite a while and
several serious or worse
5 matches
Mail list logo