Re: Quake 1.01 vs 1.06

1997-02-27 Thread Joey Hess
Larry 'Daffy' Daffner: > There ARE new squake/xquake packages. They've been sitting in > Incoming on master since quake-lib_1.06-1 showed up. Anyone know why > they haven't moved into the main tree? I don't know. I've gotten this reported by dozens of users. I've had a bug report filed on quake

Re: Quake 1.01 vs 1.06

1997-02-27 Thread Larry 'Daffy' Daffner
"RM" == Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RM> Joey, I'm a bit confused about your debian quake packaging. RM> When I first installed the debian quake (1.01), it wouldn't run RM> with my DOS lib that I patched to the 1.06 level. I think we RM> even exchanged email about it. RM>

Quake 1.01 vs 1.06

1997-02-27 Thread Rick Macdonald
Joey, I'm a bit confused about your debian quake packaging. When I first installed the debian quake (1.01), it wouldn't run with my DOS lib that I patched to the 1.06 level. I think we even exchanged email about it. Anyway, along comes a debian quake lib 1.06, but no new quake itself. And, the d