> Thanks for the info. Is there any document specifying the
> policy for the
> version numbers of Python? E.g. is 2.1 a development version, or just
> the next release after 2.0?
Check the python website; I'm not a big pythoner, but some of my users are.
IIRC, 2.1 just the next version after 2.0
* On Tue Oct 16, Justin Hahn wrote:
> python1.5 and python2.1 are the future, and are the new package,
> python and python2 are the old packages and are being phased out.
Thanks for the info. Is there any document specifying the policy for the
version numbers of Python? E.g. is 2.1 a development v
age-
> From: Jesper Holmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:23 PM
> To: Debian User
> Subject: Python versioning
>
>
> Right now, there seems to be four groups of Python packages in
> sid/woody: python* python1.5* python2* python2.1*
>
>
Right now, there seems to be four groups of Python packages in
sid/woody: python* python1.5* python2* python2.1*
I had understood that python and python2 have been kept in parallel
mainly because of earlier licensing issues, but now I am starting to get
confused.
Could someone please explain the
4 matches
Mail list logo
