2014-11-25 05:14 keltezéssel, The Wanderer írta:
>> I don't know whether /etc/apt/apt.conf is processed before fragments
>> in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d - but I'd be interested in learning.
>> Anyone??
>
> Now that you bring it up, I'd be interested in that myself. Fortunately,
> it's trivially discove
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:33:22 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> On Ma, 25 nov 14, 14:25:13, Charlie wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for that information, it was most helpful.
> >
> > I decided to add:
> >
> >
> >SuggestsImportant
> >{
> > "false"
> >};
> > };
> >
> > To the existing
On 25/11/14 21:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 25 nov 14, 14:25:13, Charlie wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for that information, it was most helpful.
>>
>> I decided to add:
>>
>>
>>SuggestsImportant
>>{
>> "false"
>>};
>> };
>>
>> To the existing etc/aptapt.conf.d/01autoremove f
On Ma, 25 nov 14, 14:25:13, Charlie wrote:
>
> Thank you for that information, it was most helpful.
>
> I decided to add:
>
>
>SuggestsImportant
>{
> "false"
>};
> };
>
> To the existing etc/aptapt.conf.d/01autoremove file.
This may or may not be what you want, but chan
On 25/11/14 15:14, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 at 11:03 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> I don't know whether /etc/apt/apt.conf is processed before
>> fragments in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d - but I'd be interested in
>> learning. Anyone??
>
> Now that you bring it up, I'd be interested in that m
On 11/24/2014 at 11:03 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> I don't know whether /etc/apt/apt.conf is processed before fragments
> in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d - but I'd be interested in learning.
> Anyone??
Now that you bring it up, I'd be interested in that myself. Fortunately,
it's trivially discoverable:
CORRECTION
On 25/11/14 14:25, Charlie wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:02:37 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>
>> On 25/11/14 13:02, Charlie wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
>>>
>> Notes:-
>> *Fragments are processed in alpha order (numbers, then the following
>> lett
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:02:37 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
> On 25/11/14 13:02, Charlie wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> >
> >> Because of this I set
> >>
> >> APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
> >>
> >> in apt.conf
> >
> > I have no apt.conf but I
On 25/11/14 13:02, Charlie wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
>
>> Because of this I set
>>
>> APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
>>
>> in apt.conf
>
> I have no apt.conf but I do have an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory?
>
> Am I missing an apt.conf file
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> Because of this I set
>
> APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
>
> in apt.conf
I have no apt.conf but I do have an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory?
Am I missing an apt.conf file and should one be added?
Charlie
--
Re
On Du, 23 nov 14, 15:11:56, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> That is expected. Because when you purged that package the tool
> doesn't know if you were going to install an alternative tool or a
> different version of that tool or something different. It shouldn't
> remove the dependencies recursively. Aga
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:11:56 -0700 Bob Proulx sent:
> Charlie wrote:
> > In a different email, under the heading: Re: Installing an
> > Alternative Init? Andrei posted this in part:
> >
> > [quote] A package not properly cleaning after itself on purge is
> > generally considered a bug in Debian,
Bob Proulx wrote:
...
also, sometimes via the package deborphan the
utility called orphaner can help get rid of
libraries that are no longer needed.
but of course with any tool, please understand
what it is asking for you to remove before saying
OK (simulate is a useful option as it may fin
Charlie wrote:
> In a different email, under the heading: Re: Installing an Alternative
> Init? Andrei posted this in part:
>
> [quote] A package not properly cleaning after itself on purge is
> generally considered a bug in Debian, severity depending on the impact,
> of course. [end quote]
>
> I
Hi.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:22:29 +1100
Charlie wrote:
>
> In a different email, under the heading: Re: Installing an Alternative
> Init? Andrei posted this in part:
>
> [quote] A package not properly cleaning after itself on purge is
> generally considered a bug in Debian, severity depending
In a different email, under the heading: Re: Installing an Alternative
Init? Andrei posted this in part:
[quote] A package not properly cleaning after itself on purge is
generally considered a bug in Debian, severity depending on the impact,
of course. [end quote]
I suppose this is literal, just
Received Tue 02 Mar 2004 9:08pm +1100 from Adam Funk:
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but...
>
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:46:18AM +, Adam Funk wrote:
> but that seems silly. Is there a "correct" way to purge foo?
Many. My favorite is just using dpkg --purge.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'` proud D
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 10:10, Adam Funk wrote:
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but...
>
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no
>
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 10:46, Adam Funk wrote:
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but...
>
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no acti
On 2004-03-02, Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but...
>
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no a
Hello
Adam Funk (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but...
>
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no
> ac
Hello Adam!
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:46:18AM +, Adam Funk wrote:
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no action.
>
> I can work aro
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:46:18AM +, Adam Funk wrote:
> Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
> later want to purge it.
>
> # apt-get --purge remove foo
> gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no action.
>
> I can work around this with
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but...
Suppose foo has already been removed without the --purge option, and I
later want to purge it.
# apt-get --purge remove foo
gives the error that foo is not installed and therefore takes no action.
I can work around this with
# apt-get install foo
# apt-
On Nov 29 2000, Defresne Sylvain wrote:
> * Rogerio Brito ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > apt-get --purge xdm
> It should be : apt-get --purge remove xdm
Yeah, of course it should be. :-(
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Ignasi Tura wrote:
> I've grepped /usr/doc/apt for 'purge', man apt, apt --help and I haven't
> found any reference towards 'purge'!
auric{jgg}~/apt2/build/bin#man apt-get | grep -B 1 -i purge
--purge
Use purge instead of remove for anything that would
> > apt-get --purge xdm
> >
> It should be : apt-get --purge remove xdm
Hi,
I've grepped /usr/doc/apt for 'purge', man apt, apt --help and I haven't found
any reference towards 'purge'!
I should repeat the commands and clean my glasses, or the docs must be updated?
A purge option f
Hi
* Rogerio Brito ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Nov 28 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > apt-get remove xdm
> > dpkg --purge xdm
>
> Just do:
>
> apt-get --purge xdm
>
It should be : apt-get --purge remove xdm
Bye
--
DEFRESNE Sylvain
On Nov 28 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> apt-get remove xdm
> dpkg --purge xdm
Just do:
apt-get --purge xdm
It saves you the trouble of doing two commands and apt-get
also takes care of the dependencies (if there are any to be
taken care of).
[]s, Ro
30 matches
Mail list logo
