on Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:20:36AM -0800, Osamu Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:28:46AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> ...
> > ...or UML: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > /me catches up on three weeks of list mail, sorta.
>
> Welcome back.
>
> Have
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:28:46AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 06:49:10PM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > [ a rather painful option ]
> >
> > Install RedHat in a chroot and run the redhat-needing app there.
>
> ...or UML: http://user-mod
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:28:46AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
...
> ...or UML: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
>
> /me catches up on three weeks of list mail, sorta.
Welcome back.
Have you used it? Is it as easy as setting up chroot environment?
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~
on Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 06:49:10PM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> [ a rather painful option ]
>
> Install RedHat in a chroot and run the redhat-needing app there.
...or UML: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
/me catches up on three weeks of list mail, sorta.
Pea
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Paul Sargent wrote:
> ...
> > Now Application A (What the apps are really doesn't matter. They're closed,
> > I don't have source), for which the box was originally built, was developed
> > by the software house on Debian. So when it ca
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote (0.91):
> the difference is almost 100% in shared libraries used. You have few
> options:
Also, C++ support is amongst the worst culprit in the shared library
dance... according to the LSB, if you want to distribute C++
applications, yo
Paul Sargent wrote:
...
> Now Application A (What the apps are really doesn't matter. They're closed,
> I don't have source), for which the box was originally built, was developed
> by the software house on Debian. So when it came time to build our box we
> replicated their systems and used Debian
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:44:45AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
>
> It looks to me like a library incompatibility issue. Differences in the
> way the libc handles malloc can cause weird problems[...]
Maybe I was being naive, but I thought such things were reasonably constant.
Oh well.
> The s
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Paul Sargent wrote:
> This might not be classed as a debian problem per-se, but I'm
> wondering if anybody here has any suggestions to get me out of this
> hole, a hole which is probably more political than technical. Maybe
> somebody else has been in a similar situation.
It l
Hi People,
This might not be classed as a debian problem per-se, but I'm wondering if
anybody here has any suggestions to get me out of this hole, a hole which is
probably more political than technical. Maybe somebody else has been in a
similar situation.
I'm in charge of a Linux Box which we use
10 matches
Mail list logo
