Re: process limits (was: Spamassain question, whitelist?)

2003-12-14 Thread Randy Orrison
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:51:04AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: | > > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]: | > > > For performance reasons, I also have in /etc/security/limits: | > > > | > > > mailhardnproc 30 | > > > | > > > ...to avoid runaway condit

Re: process limits (was: Spamassain question, whitelist?)

2003-12-09 Thread Bill Goudie
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:06:52PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 19:46]: > > > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >

Re: process limits (was: Spamassain question, whitelist?)

2003-12-09 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 19:46]: > > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]: > > > > For per

process limits (was: Spamassain question, whitelist?)

2003-12-09 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 19:46]: > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]: > > > For performance reasons, I also have in /etc/security/limits: > > > > > > mailha

Re: process limits

1999-11-19 Thread aphro
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Marcin Inkielman wrote: marn >even for more than 500 process in total for all users? 2.2 can do 1024 processes..ive never gotten near that high (my highest limit has been about 320 processes and that was with runaway processes) from the looks of the code you posted originall

Re: process limits

1999-11-18 Thread Marcin Inkielman
thanks for your respose On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, aphro wrote: > marn >fork fails in ~300 iteration > marn >i would like it fails in for example 3000 iter. > > may have to wait for 2.4 to do that.. > even for more than 500 process in total for all users? > check /include/linux/limits.h 2.2 def

Re: process limits

1999-11-17 Thread aphro
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Marcin Inkielman wrote: marn >does anybody know how may I force linux to run more than ~300-500 marn >processes i thought ~100 was a lot :) marn >fork fails in ~300 iteration check ulimits (ulimit -a). what kernel are you running? marn >i would like it fails in for exampl

process limits

1999-11-17 Thread Marcin Inkielman
sorry, I am not sure this is the right place to ask thi question: does anybody know how may I force linux to run more than ~300-500 processes for example when I run: while : ; do sleep 1 & done fork fails in ~300 iteration i would like it fails in for example 3000 iter. thanks in advan

Re: Process Limits

1999-09-05 Thread Phil Brutsche
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, shaul wrote: > Perhaps by editing ? > > > is there anyway of setting process limits to the users, like in +BSD's? > > Try `man ulimit`. -- -- Phil Brutsche

Re: Process Limits

1999-09-05 Thread shaul
Perhaps by editing ? > is there anyway of setting process limits to the users, like in +BSD's? >

Process Limits

1999-09-03 Thread Stavros
is there anyway of setting process limits to the users, like in +BSD's?