On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:45:54 -0500
Brad Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ah, so /thats/ it there is a new version that pciutils depends on.
> So I have to wait until Sid gets the new versions of libpci1 and 2.
Well, the way I read it it all is:
1. the pciutils in sarge is currently broken
Ah, so /thats/ it there is a new version that pciutils depends on.
So I have to wait until Sid gets the new versions of libpci1 and 2.
--
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to see it, do the other
trees make fun of it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 5:27 pm, Chris Metzler wrote:
> What did you find when you looked in the bug tracking system
> for pciutils bugs?
That there is some breakage, however the new version is supposed to
correct however AFAK it either hasn't hit Sid yet, or it doesn't work <:/>
--
If a tree fa
Hello Brad!
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:09:54PM -0500, Brad Sims wrote:
> My problem is this: pciutils needs libpci1, but I also have/need libpci2...
^^
Does it? 1:2.1.11-10 did need libpci1, but -11 which conflicts with
libpci2 does not.
> I can upgrade
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:09:54 -0500
Brad Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My problem is this: pciutils needs libpci1, but I also have/need
> libpci2...
>
> I can upgrade both libs manually but upgrading pciutils means removing
> libpci2... Any ideas?
What did you find when you looked in the bug
My problem is this: pciutils needs libpci1, but I also have/need libpci2...
I can upgrade both libs manually but upgrading pciutils means removing libpci2...
Any ideas?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo