Re: Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade

2008-08-11 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,11.Aug.08, 16:42:39, Mark Phillips wrote: > I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian > lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this > machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version > 2.22. If I do an apt-get install ev

Re: Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade

2008-08-11 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Mark Phillips wrote: > I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian > lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this > machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version > 2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete

Re: Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade

2008-08-11 Thread Shachar Or
On Monday 11 August 2008 23:42, Mark Phillips wrote: > I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian > lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this > machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version > 2.22. If I do an apt-get instal

Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade

2008-08-11 Thread Mark Phillips
I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version 2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a huge number of packages an

Re: problems with apt-get update

2007-03-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hola David, Am 2007-03-08 10:44:53, schrieb David Primero Segundo: > linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update > Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB] > Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages > Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release > Obj http://security.d

Re: problems with apt-get update

2007-03-08 Thread Cédric Lucantis
> no friend, the error continues, i try this: > linex-inWpyZ:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf > > APT >{ > APT::Cache-Limit "1"; > CDROM > { >NoMount "True"; > }; >}; > hmm, not sure about it, but maybe APT::Cache-Limit inside APT{} is redundant and

Re: problems with apt-get update

2007-03-08 Thread David Primero Segundo
}; }; and then, with: apt-get update, but i don't get luck. From: Cédric Lucantis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: problems with apt-get update Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:14:32 +0100 Hi, > hi, my problem is the next: > when i run apt-

Re: problems with apt-get update

2007-03-08 Thread Cédric Lucantis
Hi, > hi, my problem is the next: > when i run apt-get update, debian says me: > ... > E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida) > E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el > archivo de estado. > > my sourcelist is this: > deb http://apt.linex.org/linex2006 sarge

Re: problems with apt-get update

2007-03-08 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hellol David. David Primero Segundo, 08.03.2007 11:44: > hi, my problem is the next: > when i run apt-get update, debian says me: > > > linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update > Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB] > Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages > Ob

problems with apt-get update

2007-03-08 Thread David Primero Segundo
hi, my problem is the next: when i run apt-get update, debian says me: linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB] Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release Obj http://security.debia

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-02 Thread Johann Koenig
On Friday January 2 at 09:09am "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Johann Koenig wrote: > > On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm > > "Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: > >>snip > >> > What's going

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-02 Thread Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 16:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: > Johann Koenig wrote: > > On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm > > "Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: > >>snip > >> > What's going on here? I can't do anyth

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-02 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
Johann Koenig wrote: On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm "Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem.

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-02 Thread Johann Koenig
On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm "Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: > snip > > > > > > What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without > > > commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this > > >

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-02 Thread Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip > > > > What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without > > commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. > > apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental Can you give me your sources for this expe

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-01 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
Antony Gelberg wrote: On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:09:27PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well a

Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-01 Thread Antony Gelberg
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:09:27PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: > Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because > testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are > really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well as > really old p

[Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-01 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be

Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: > W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A > W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-

Re: Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-01 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. said > W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A > W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US

Problems with apt-get update

2004-01-01 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public