On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:30:43AM -0400, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:19:17PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> ...
> | I realize that old 2.2 stock kernel had apm compiled in but new 2.4
> | kernel comes with apm as module.
>
> Osamu: Thanks for mentioning this! I was browsing through par
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:19:17PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
| I realize that old 2.2 stock kernel had apm compiled in but new 2.4
| kernel comes with apm as module.
Osamu: Thanks for mentioning this! I was browsing through parts of
this thread, and this comment allowed me to fix APM on my sys
Hi dman!
On Tue, 04 Sep 2001, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:06:06PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> | When I compiled 2.4 with make-kpkg (taken from unstable), it did not
> | make initrd image. (So it crashed :-) Where should I look to get new
> | kernel for 2.4?
>
> You need to tell ma
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:06:06PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
| When I compiled 2.4 with make-kpkg (taken from unstable), it did not
| make initrd image. (So it crashed :-) Where should I look to get new
| kernel for 2.4?
You need to tell make-kpkg that you want an initrd. '--initrd' might
be th
When I compiled 2.4 with make-kpkg (taken from unstable), it did not
make initrd image. (So it crashed :-) Where should I look to get new
kernel for 2.4?
But did you compile apm as module like stock debian 686-smp kernel or
did you compile as part of kernel? Can you tell me which one you used?
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:41:07AM +0800, Calvin Chong wrote:
> I suggest NO APM for SMP machines...
Yes, I know it was the case and HOWTO said so at one point in history.
Is this still true?
Enabling APM in BIOS surly crashed kernel but enabling APM on recent
kernel shall not be real issue with
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/09/2001 (10:40) :
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:06:58PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > Interestingly, I have a similar problem on my laptop. The 2.4.9
> > kernel broke apm (/proc/apm didn't exist) but it appeared to load
> > properly on bootup. 2.4.8 stil
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Problems with APM after recompiling of kernel.
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:06:58PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > Interestingly, I have a similar problem on my laptop. The 2.4.9
> > kernel
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:06:58PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Interestingly, I have a similar problem on my laptop. The 2.4.9
> kernel broke apm (/proc/apm didn't exist) but it appeared to load
> properly on bootup. 2.4.8 still works fine though.
I can not see /proc/apm even in my stock 2.4.8-
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The kernel that comes with Debian testing, turns off (the power) my
> machine when I run: shutdown -h now. But I wanted to recompile the
> kernel and choose 2.2.18 (as I had some problems with 2.2.19). I enabled
> APM in the kernel and lilo says append=
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 04:27:54PM +, Preben Randhol wrote:
> The kernel that comes with Debian testing, turns off (the power) my
> machine when I run: shutdown -h now. But I wanted to recompile the
> kernel and choose 2.2.18 (as I had some problems with 2.2.19). I enabled
> APM in the kernel a
The kernel that comes with Debian testing, turns off (the power) my
machine when I run: shutdown -h now. But I wanted to recompile the
kernel and choose 2.2.18 (as I had some problems with 2.2.19). I enabled
APM in the kernel and lilo says append="apm=on", but the problem is that
now the kernel sto
12 matches
Mail list logo
