On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 08:29:30PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > You need libc6 2.1.x - or you can grab the sources and recompile using
> > > libc6 2.0.
> >
> > Thats what I did. However, the same problem also occurs on non-Debian
> > archictures that don't have glibc. signing works fine - i
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Brian May wrote:
> > You need libc6 2.1.x - or you can grab the sources and recompile using
> > libc6 2.0.
>
> Thats what I did. However, the same problem also occurs on non-Debian
> archictures that don't have glibc. signing works fine - it is just
> encryption that I have
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 09:02:28PM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote:
>
> > Why does the following not work? If I don't get any reply from
> > debian-user, I will post to debian-devel, as I am reasonably certain I
> > got these packages from potato.
>
> I reported a bug a while ago about gpg-rsa2 and gpg
> Why does the following not work? If I don't get any reply from
> debian-user, I will post to debian-devel, as I am reasonably certain I
> got these packages from potato.
I reported a bug a while ago about gpg-rsa2 and gpg-idea2, and the
answer was:
You need libc6 2.1.x - or you can grab the so
Why does the following not work? If I don't get any reply from
debian-user, I will post to debian-devel, as I am reasonably certain I
got these packages from potato.
[540] [snoopy:bam] >gpg -se -r bam abc
gpg (GnuPG) 0.9.7; Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program comes with
5 matches
Mail list logo