Re: Problem with MX records behind firewall.

2003-06-03 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 03 Jun 2003 4:55 am, Andrew Shipton wrote: ... > In your case, is it possible to add a static route on the netgear box to > point to your mail server? This would mean that the internal addresses > would be routed correctly, but it may affec

Re: Problem with MX records behind firewall.

2003-06-03 Thread Andrew Shipton
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:31:03PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > Interesting idea, but I am not sure how it works - so is your configuration > like mine? > > On the lan, the default gateway is the netgear box (10.0.10.200) and the mail > server is a separate box on the lan (10.0.10.100). All ma

Re: Problem with MX records behind firewall.

2003-06-03 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 02 Jun 2003 8:08 am, Andrew Shipton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:16:30AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > > I am having a problem with Mailman on my internal network with the > > chandlerfamily.org.uk mail addresses. My guess is its doin

Re: Problem with MX records behind firewall.

2003-06-02 Thread Andrew Shipton
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:16:30AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > I am having a problem with Mailman on my internal network with the > chandlerfamily.org.uk mail addresses. My guess is its doing an MX lookup and > getting the external address of my netgear box. Unfortunately, the > port-forwa

Problem with MX records behind firewall.

2003-06-02 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a netgear firewall/router that allows portforwarding of specific ports to my internal network. If I send mail to chandlerfamily.org.uk the MX record on the external DNS for this is the external address of my netgear box, but attempts to acces