On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:00:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2009-08-01 12:33 +0200, Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, in today reconsidering upgrading to Debian 5.0, and, reading
>>> the information on the Debian web site, and, in checking using
On 2009-08-02 01:02, Bret Busby wrote:
[snip]
I think it is the UUID's. Long character identifiers for partitions,
that require a specific process to find what is the UUID for a
partition, then it has to be entered, in a different syntax, to have
logical drives automatically mounted, on bootu
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 02:02:56PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Brian Marshall wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:00:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> The problem with downloading the applications from seamonkey, is
>>> that they are .tar.gz files, rather than .deb packages, and
Bret Busby skrev:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Brian Marshall wrote:
The source of information that led me to believe that Debian requires
java, is, on the web page at
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html
, where it states
"2.7. Java now in Debian
The OpenJDK
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Brian Marshall wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:00:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
The problem with downloading the applications from seamonkey, is
that they are .tar.gz files, rather than .deb packages, and my
experience with using .tar.gz files for installing software, rat
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:00:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> The problem with downloading the applications from seamonkey, is
> that they are .tar.gz files, rather than .deb packages, and my
> experience with using .tar.gz files for installing software, rather
> than .deb packages, is that the .ta
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-08-01 12:33 +0200, Bret Busby wrote:
Actually, in today reconsidering upgrading to Debian 5.0, and, reading
the information on the Debian web site, and, in checking using the
package search facility on the Debian web site, I have found that
Debi
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-08-01 13:07 +0200, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-01 05:33, Bret Busby wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Actually, in today reconsidering upgrading to Debian 5.0, and,
>>> reading the information on the Debian web site, and, in checking
>>> u
On 2009-08-01 13:07 +0200, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-01 05:33, Bret Busby wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Actually, in today reconsidering upgrading to Debian 5.0, and,
>> reading the information on the Debian web site, and, in checking
>> using the package search facility on the Debian web site, I ha
On 2009-08-01 12:33 +0200, Bret Busby wrote:
> Actually, in today reconsidering upgrading to Debian 5.0, and, reading
> the information on the Debian web site, and, in checking using the
> package search facility on the Debian web site, I have found that
> Debian 5.0 excludes Iceape and Seamonkey,
On 2009-08-01 05:33, Bret Busby wrote:
[snip]
Actually, in today reconsidering upgrading to Debian 5.0, and, reading
the information on the Debian web site, and, in checking using the
package search facility on the Debian web site, I have found that Debian
5.0 excludes Iceape and Seamonkey,
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Bret Busby wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
I am running Debian 4.0 on this computer.
The facility Desktop -> Lock Screen, is not working.
It's quite probable that this is just a configuration issue. What is
your configuration?
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Kousik Maiti wrote:
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:03:04 +0530
From: Kousik Maiti
To: Bret Busby
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with Debian 4.0 security
Are you login as root user?? From root you can't use lock screen facility.
On Wed, Jun 24, 20
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
I am running Debian 4.0 on this computer.
The facility Desktop -> Lock Screen, is not working.
It's quite probable that this is just a configuration issue. What is
your configuration?
Which configuration?
In which file wo
Are you login as root user?? From root you can't use lock screen facility.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am running Debian 4.0 on this computer.
>
> The facility Desktop -> Lock Screen, is not working.
>
> The facility Applications -> Debian -> Screen -> Lock
Bret Busby wrote:
> I am running Debian 4.0 on this computer.
>
> The facility Desktop -> Lock Screen, is not working.
It's quite probable that this is just a configuration issue. What is
your configuration?
If you are concerned about security, you should schedule your upgrade to
Debian "lenny"
On Wed,24.Jun.09, 15:20:11, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am running Debian 4.0 on this computer.
>
> The facility Desktop -> Lock Screen, is not working.
1. You didn't mention what DE you are using (Gnome, KDE, ...)
2. Do you have xlockmore installed? Try running it directly.
Regards,
Andre
Hello.
I am running Debian 4.0 on this computer.
The facility Desktop -> Lock Screen, is not working.
The facility Applications -> Debian -> Screen -> Lock -> KTux, raises a
screensaver, but that screen can simply be closed, by clicking on the
cross in the top right corner of the window, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
