Re: Preferred PPPoE Tool (Was Recommended ISP's)

2004-01-20 Thread Jacob S.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:41:28 + (UTC) M.Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to DSLreports.org, the "bridged" type ADSL connections no > longer exist. All new ADSL installations are of the PPPoE breed. If > their information is accurate (http://www.dslreports.com/faq/1416), > that

Re: Preferred PPPoE Tool (Was Recommended ISP's)

2004-01-20 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:41:28PM +, M.Kirchhoff wrote: > According to DSLreports.org, the "bridged" type ADSL connections no > longer exist. All new ADSL installations are of the PPPoE breed. If > their information is accurate (http://www.dslrep

Re: Preferred PPPoE Tool (Was Recommended ISP's)

2004-01-20 Thread M . Kirchhoff
Paul Johnson ursine.ca> writes: > PPPoE is a classic sign > that the ISP is deliberately overselling their network and needs a > convienent way to "drop" your connection when you've been online "too > long." > According to DSLreports.org, the "bridged" type ADSL connections no longer exist. All

Re: Preferred PPPoE Tool (Was Recommended ISP's)

2004-01-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:12:21PM +, M.Kirchhoff wrote: > We'll soon be picking up DSL soon. Is there a particular DSL/PPPoE "KillerApp" > that is easy to setup and use? Yes. Boycott all ISPs that employ this in your area. Find one not trying

Preferred PPPoE Tool (Was Recommended ISP's)

2004-01-19 Thread M . Kirchhoff
Paul Johnson ursine.ca> writes: > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:47:33AM -0500, John Kerr Anderson wrote: > > We're thinking of switching to charter cable internet, but rumour is > > they're partnered with Micro$oft. Any recommendations??? > > Actually, they're not partnered with Microsoft. Pau