On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:51:55PM -0500, Rich Puhek wrote:
| Alan Poulton wrote:
| >
| > I was wondering.. should I be sticking with Potato or switch to Woody?
| >
| (snip)
| > If I upgrade to Woody, how do I do it? Would I just edit
| > /etc/apt/sources.list, replace all "stable" with "woody",
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:51:55PM -0500, Rich Puhek wrote:
> Alan Poulton wrote:
> > I was wondering.. should I be sticking with Potato or switch to Woody?
> >
> (snip)
> > If I upgrade to Woody, how do I do it? Would I just edit
> > /etc/apt/sources.list, replace all "stable" with "woody", then
Alan Poulton wrote:
>
> I was wondering.. should I be sticking with Potato or switch to Woody?
>
(snip)
> If I upgrade to Woody, how do I do it? Would I just edit
> /etc/apt/sources.list, replace all "stable" with "woody", then apt-get
> update; apt-get upgrade ?
> A friend of mine, who knows way
I was wondering.. should I be sticking with Potato or switch to Woody?
Currently, my setup is I am running a Gateway. A router so my Windows
computers can share an internet connection. I installed Potato 2.2r5,
but I wanted iptables so I performed the Bunk hack to upgrade to Kernel
version 2.4.17.
Subject: IP_Tables in Potato vs. Woody
Date: Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:48:29PM -0500
In reply to:Lance Peterson
Quoting Lance Peterson([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have written an IPTables set of firewall rules on a developement system
> that I want to use on a stand alone
I have written an IPTables set of firewall rules on a developement system
that I want to use on a stand alone Debian firewall.
Would I be better off compiling a 2.4.x kernel into Potato, or just go
with the testing release of Woody?
And does anyone have a precompiled list of base packages that ca
6 matches
Mail list logo
