Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Is there something that should be done with this or is it just
> informational?
safe to ignore. if you want to get rid of it check the sendmail
docs, i think that falls under the privacyoptions directive.
nate
--
:::
ICQ: 75132336
http://www.aphroland.org
We are upgrading one of our mail servers from Slink to Potato. Under Slink
it had sendmail version 9.9.3-3. Under the new Potato the sendmail is
version 8.9.3-23.
All seems to go OK except in the syslog file I'm now seeing messages like
that have "NOQUEUE: Authentication-Warning:" here is an exa
hello everyone,
i wonder if anyone might be able to help me or if anyone has had a
similar problem. Since upgrading to potato i've been unable to get
sound to work. I know looking in the archives that this sort of
problem seems to occur regularly but i haven't yet found a solution.
i've got a Yam
Dean wrote:
Hi all:
Just finished upgrading to potato and have a warning
both at start up and when shutting down:
[mntent]: warning: no final newline at the end
of /etc/fstab
Do I just edit /etc/fstab and put final on the last line?
tia Dean
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 31-May-2000 Dean wrote:
> Hi all:
> Just finished upgrading to potato and have a warning
> both at start up and when shutting down:
> [mntent]: warning: no final newline at the end
> of /etc/fstab
> Do I just edit /etc/fstab and put final on the last line?
> tia Dean
unless something ate a b
Hi all:
Just finished upgrading to potato and have a warning
both at start up and when shutting down:
[mntent]: warning: no final newline at the end
of /etc/fstab
Do I just edit /etc/fstab and put final on the last line?
tia Dean
Quoting William Dowling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Can some one explain the relation between kernel upgrade and
> slink->potato upgrade?
They're separate issues in the main. What you have to be careful about
is that you don't accidently upgrade packages that are related to the
ker
them
in. So the first lines of my /etc/init.d/network (after the
#!/bin/sh) looks like:
/sbin/insmod rtl8139
/sbin/insmod smc-ultra
That way it works the way I want it to work... ;-)
Ron Rademaker
On Tue, 30 May 2000, William Dowling wrote:
> Can some one explain the relation between kerne
Can some one explain the relation between kernel upgrade and
slink->potato upgrade?
I had a working slink, and did this:
1) updated from my 2.0.36 kernel to 2.2.14 by installing just
kernel-image-2.2.14-ide.
This was a failure in that after the update, (on network start, I think)
I saw messa
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:59:08AM +0200, Vitux wrote:
> I see. Security isn't such a big issue on this stand-alone
> home-use box, but anyway: how do I find out which group owns
> /dev/xconsole?
ls -l /dev/xconsole
Should be root.adm and be a fifo /dev/xconsole|
--
¶ One·should·only·use·the·A
Brad wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Vitux wrote:
> > Previously (in slink, 4 days ago), Xconsole was run when
> > launching fvwm. Now, it doesn't start automagically, and gives
> > an error: Couldn't open console when I start it manually.
> > I find it quite annoying; I've go
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Vitux wrote:
> Previously (in slink, 4 days ago), Xconsole was run when
> launching fvwm. Now, it doesn't start automagically, and gives
> an error: Couldn't open console when I start it manually.
> I find it quite annoying; I've gotten used to keeping an e
if you didn't specify the file option, try:
xconsole -file /dev/xconsole
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Vitux wrote:
> Hi Debs
> Previously (in slink, 4 days ago), Xconsole was run when
> launching fvwm. Now, it doesn't start automagically, and gives
> an error: Couldn't open console
Hi Debs
Previously (in slink, 4 days ago), Xconsole was run when
launching fvwm. Now, it doesn't start automagically, and gives
an error: Couldn't open console when I start it manually.
I find it quite annoying; I've gotten used to keeping an eye
on the modem when dialing and my ailing /dev/hdc (ol
After upgrading (Storm Linux) Slink to Potato I have found that Gnome no
longer
displays the icons of my choice on the desktop. I get only the standard
folder and document icons. If I try to change them I can go through the
motions, but the new icon is not displayed on the desktop. My
~/.xsession-e
I need to move on to the 2.2.x kernel and glibc 2.1.
Is there anywhere look for some guidelines/problems if I upgrade now?
The list of 271 release-critical bugs is a bit scary...
...RickM...
* rich said:
> I have also seen some messages about /dev/dsp being gone, and xwave
> says:
>
> cannot access audio device...
>
> Any ideas?
Are you using ALSA?
pgpqLlyeCNLmq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Howdy,
After upgrading, I cannot turn on my audio mixer anymore:
wmmixer : Unable to open mixer device '/dev/mixer'.
wmmixer : Sorry, no supported channels found.
I have also seen some messages about /dev/dsp being gone, and xwave
says:
cannot access audio device...
Any ideas?
Thanks
rich wrote:
>
> Is it OK to remove all of the packages that dselect calls "obsolete"
> after potato upgrade?
-
I would be careful about that. Some of your custom installed software
may need some of the
Generally, yes. Just use dselect to do it. If it bitches about broken
dependencies, put it back.
Bryan
On 21-Jan-2000 rich wrote:
> Is it OK to remove all of the packages that dselect calls "obsolete"
> after potato upgrade?
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s
Is it OK to remove all of the packages that dselect calls "obsolete"
after potato upgrade?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just dl'd packages for a dist-upgrade, then started the actual processing
> run (I always get the packages first), but got an immediate error...
>
> Need to get 0B/150MB of archives. After unpacking 8489kB will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
>
> 100% [Scannin
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 10:30:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just dl'd packages for a dist-upgrade, then started the actual processing
> run (I always get the packages first), but got an immediate error...
...
> Configuring packages..
> /tmp/fileAsdL1s: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No suc
Just dl'd packages for a dist-upgrade, then started the actual processing
run (I always get the packages first), but got an immediate error...
Need to get 0B/150MB of archives. After unpacking 8489kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
100% [Scanning packages]
Configuring packages..
/tmp
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> I am getting into some kind of loop and I need to remove perl-base
> (temporarily) but it is an essential package. The other way around this is to
> activate APT::Force LoopBreak but I don't know what that means and the apt man
> pages do not tell me what t
I am getting into some kind of loop and I need to remove perl-base
(temporarily) but it is an essential package. The other way around this is to
activate APT::Force LoopBreak but I don't know what that means and the apt man
pages do not tell me what that is.
Any ideas on how I can fix this?
than
When using:
apt-get upgrade
on the unstable distribution I get an error running the upgrade.
The error is this:
Syntax error at sometmpfile line 263:
E: sub-process dpkg-preconfig --apt returned an error code (2)
E: failure running script dpkg-preconfig --apt
I don't seem to be able to
On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 01:50:34AM -0600, John Foster wrote
> I just upgraded a very stable pure Slink system to Potato and I have a
> few legacy problems ( I think)!
>
[snip]
>
> For some reason Enlightenment is set as the default and the Gnome
> control panel will not change it. Yes I told it
I just upgraded a very stable pure Slink system to Potato and I have a
few legacy problems ( I think)!
Emacs is stuck--won't install or be purged-no dependencies unaccounted
for.
Sound (OSS commercial) is installed but none of the Gnome sound effects
work. Players, mixers, etc all OK.
For some
This is a very interesting message. Thanks to both of you. Unfortunately,
this is still quite obscure for me, as I am definitely a newbie (forced to
upgrade from slink to potato to make my laptop work).
How can I install a library (by hand)?
Bye
Alessandro
P.S. non-technical intriguing question
I downloaded a week old potato snapshot
binary-i386 and binary-all directories
what should i do now ? i don't want to upgrade every package manually. Is there
any rules how can i use apt-get across my LAN
to upgrade distro automatically ?
--
+-------------------
Sven Esbjerg wrote:
> Another thing. When I install new packages from dselect I get an error:
> Cannot find termcap: Can't find a valid termcap file at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.005/Term/ReadLine.pm line 305
>
> Is this a general error (I haven't seen it on any other potato-machines)?
It happens to me
Graham Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I went that path also (dist-upgrade to get potato) and had some of the
> same problems.
>
> The most serious for me was that my pcmcia modem card stopped working
> somewhere along the way.
I also have had this problem. One thing that makes my mode
> After a long battle with an upgrade to potato from a very customized slink am
> allmost happy. I just miss one thing:
> I cannot start gdm due to some wierd problem. It complains about the user and
> group for /var/gdm. Supposedly they should be nobody:deamon but that doesn't
> work either. In S
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 10:24:03PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libslang.so (No such file
> or directory), skipping
> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libtcpwrapGK.so.1 is not a symlink
> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libomnithread.so.2
Dan Christensen wrote:
> o Does potato contain all of the Y2K upgrades in slink and a half?
> And all current security updates?
Yes.
> - Throughout the upgrade I got the following message:
>
> Cannot find termcap: Can't find a valid termcap file at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.004/Term/Re
The command 'update-alternatives' may help you sort out the mess. It may
be somewhat tedious to do though.
--
++
| Eric G. Milleregm2@jps.net |
| GnuPG public key: http://www.jps.net/egm2/gpg.asc |
+--
Hi Dan,
I went that path also (dist-upgrade to get potato) and had some of the
same problems.
The most serious for me was that my pcmcia modem card stopped working
somewhere along the way. After recompiling kernels and pcmcia and
different options etc I gave up. I reinstalled (slink) from scra
On 28/11/99 Dan Christensen wrote:
I just upgraded my mostly stock slink machine to potato with
"apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade". Now I have both /usr/man
and /usr/share/man on my system, and neither is a symlink to the
other. A quick glance showed no files in common between the
two dire
I just upgraded my mostly stock slink machine to potato with
"apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade". Now I have both /usr/man
and /usr/share/man on my system, and neither is a symlink to the
other. A quick glance showed no files in common between the
two directories, and they both contain around
Last night I upgraded my fairly stock slink machine to potato using
"apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade". I have various questions.
The last group of questions is about all the errors that occurred.
o Does potato contain all of the Y2K upgrades in slink and a half?
And all current security up
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 10:35:52PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed slink on a new SCSI disk for my dual oc 450 MHz
> Celeron machine. (suse 6.2 is already on an IDE disk).
>
> Since I'm new to .deb-based systems I would like to ask a few questions:
>
> (I have been
After a long battle with an upgrade to potato from a very customized slink am
allmost happy. I just miss one thing:
I cannot start gdm due to some wierd problem. It complains about the user and
group for /var/gdm. Supposedly they should be nobody:deamon but that doesn't
work either. In Slink it was
Hello,
I recently installed slink on a new SCSI disk for my dual oc 450 MHz
Celeron machine. (suse 6.2 is already on an IDE disk).
Since I'm new to .deb-based systems I would like to ask a few questions:
(I have been running RedHat since 5.0 up to 6.1 and rawhide, mandrake
6.1 and suse 6.2 on di
Hello!
After finally upgrading to hamm->potato, one small problem remains unsolved
(the rest I managed to kill :).
While printing works fine when I do 'cat > /dev/', lpd seems
to think the printer is offline (lpc claims the daemon is waiting for
the printer).
What could be the cause of such a p
Hi:
I recently upgraded over the network to potato from slink
and then installed linux 2.2.13. I was having the following
problem. It would come up with endless messages about
140.228.8.157 sent an invalild ICMP error to a broadcast.
Also ypbind would not work when it booted up, but
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, upgrading to potato is mostly all or nothing. Lots of changes
> have occured.
This is absolutely not true. I've been upgrading incrementally, taking
very small steps, for what seems like forever (due mostly to my slow and
expensi
*- On 11 Nov, Stephen A. Witt wrote about "RE: What do I REALLY need for Potato
upgrade?"
> On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
>
>> *- On 10 Nov, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote about "RE: What do I REALLY need for
>> Potato upgrade?"
>> &g
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
> *- On 10 Nov, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote about "RE: What do I REALLY need for
> Potato upgrade?"
> >
> > On 10-Nov-99 David J. Kanter wrote:
> >> I'm in the process of going from Slink to Potato, but
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:29:54PM -0600, David J. Kanter wrote:
> I'm in the process of going from Slink to Potato, but I've got a modem. I'm
> not going to download all the updated packages, but what should I get to get
> a relatively solid Potato build?
Download all of the base packages f
*- On 10 Nov, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote about "RE: What do I REALLY need for
Potato upgrade?"
>
> On 10-Nov-99 David J. Kanter wrote:
>> I'm in the process of going from Slink to Potato, but I've got a modem. I'm
>> not going to download a
On 10-Nov-99 David J. Kanter wrote:
> I'm in the process of going from Slink to Potato, but I've got a modem. I'm
> not going to download all the updated packages, but what should I get to get
> a relatively solid Potato build?
>
Unfortunately, upgrading to potato is mostly all or nothing. Lots
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, David J. Kanter wrote:
djkant >I'm in the process of going from Slink to Potato, but I've got a modem.
I'm
djkant >not going to download all the updated packages, but what should I get
to get
djkant >a relatively solid Potato build?
Wait till its final, and get a CD ;)
nate
I'm in the process of going from Slink to Potato, but I've got a modem. I'm
not going to download all the updated packages, but what should I get to get
a relatively solid Potato build?
Thanks.
--
David J. Kanter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Humans have an innate tendency to attribute significance to anom
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
>I updated libncurses4, libncurses4-dev, libreadlineg2_2.1-13.6
>(bash_2.02.1-1.8) as well now, but I'm having trouble since libc6-dev
>conflicts with libstdc++2.9-dev:
[...]
>Fine, so I try to deinstall libstdc++2.9-dev but:
>
>h0rus:/tmp# dpkg --purge lib
r/lib/libcrypt.so (No such file or
> > directory), skipping
> [...]
>
> You've updated the base shared libraries but not the development packages.
> Update libc6-dev, libncurses4-dev, etc.
Please, help me up with this as I'm starting to have a hard time with
potato upgrade, a
J Horacio MG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libBrokenLocale.so (No such file
> or directory), skipping
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libcrypt.so (No such file or
> directory), skipping
[...]
You've updated the base shared libraries but not the devel
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 08:30:23AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> Out of despration, I tried the lines below instead of the ones you gave me.
>
> Lines you had me use:
> auth required pam_unix_auth.so
> account required pam_unix_acct.so
> password required
Ben,
Out of despration, I tried the lines below instead of the ones you gave me.
Lines you had me use:
auth required pam_unix_auth.so
account required pam_unix_acct.so
password required pam_unix_passwd.so
session required pam_unix_session.so
Lines taken from the ot
In the dselect list I see
passwd19990827-7
shadowI do not see a package called shadow.
I am getting my debian from ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib
non-free
There is not a package called pam-apps on the list.
Do you think the segmentation faults I get with passwd, su,
Hi,
Please, bear with me for a while as it seems I'm in trouble.
I recently upgraded the following from potato:
apt_0.3.13.deb libstdc++2.10_2.95.2-0pre2.deb
gconv-modules_2.1.2-5.deblibstdc++2.9_2.91.61-1.deb
glibc-doc_2.1.2-5.deblocales_2.1.2-5
On 23-Oct-99 Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I could not find pam-apps at all using dselect. While I was there, I
> removed all obsolete packages
> (there were several, and this did not have any other affects). dselect did
> want to install several
> other packages but this did not help e
Ben,
I could not find pam-apps at all using dselect. While I was there, I removed
all obsolete packages
(there were several, and this did not have any other affects). dselect did
want to install several
other packages but this did not help either.
I am not sure why my system ended up with sha
I can not log in and the passwd function still give me a segmentation fault. I
will remove
pam-apps.
Do I need to do anything else to get the changes I've made to be recognized?
Doug
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 11:44:27AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > Ok, I modified t
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 11:44:27AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ok, I modified the file as you show below.
>
> Did you notice that there was a file named other.dpkg-dist that had the
> following in it?
> Not sure if this is important or not.
> auth required pam_unix.so
> account
Ok, I modified the file as you show below.
Did you notice that there was a file named other.dpkg-dist that had the
following in it?
Not sure if this is important or not.
auth required pam_unix.so
account required pam_unix.so
password required pam_unix.so
session required
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 08:51:47AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ok Ben, here they are.
>
> One other thing to note: During the install I had a message with "modutils"
> stating
> that The form:
> Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10 was replaced with the form:
> Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10/fs
Thanks for the reply Eric,
I have attacked the output from /etc/dpkg -S pam
"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > Hello & Help!
> >
> > I have a potato system that was running fine until a few minutes ago...
> >
> > After the upgrad
Ok Ben, here they are.
One other thing to note: During the install I had a message with "modutils"
stating
that The form:
Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10 was replaced with the form:
Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10/fs
I could not find where to change thi. I did find a file called
conf.modules.old
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> What is going on? Please help me recover my system. I currently have a
> single login as root where I was running dselect. I am afraid to log
> off because I don't want to be locked out permanently.
Can you attach all of the
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Hello & Help!
>
> I have a potato system that was running fine until a few minutes ago...
>
> After the upgrade I have seen these problems: (It upgraded about 50M of
> packages).
>
> 1. I can not login to a virtual terminal.
Hello & Help!
I have a potato system that was running fine until a few minutes ago...
I used dselect to select a package and it wanted to upgrade a bunch on
stuff. I let it because I was interested to see how long it would take
with my new DSL connection.
After the upgrade I have seen these pro
Greetings:
Last night, I completed my upgrade to potato with an 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.
The only breakage I haven't been able to fix is in papd, or something
related.
When I try to print through the Debian system from a Macintosh, the file
goes into the print queue but the print queue stops. I ge
I recently upgraded from slink to potato. At some point, my
inetd.conf file got "##" prepended to the ftp line,
disabling it. A comment at the top of inetd.conf says "Lines
starting with ... "##" should not be changed unless you know
what you are doing!"
As I have apparently have no idea what I'
>On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I apologize up front for the length of this post, but am trying to max
>> the info for brave souls who may be able to help me...
>>
>> An upgrade initially using apt-get then finished with deselect has
>> left an unknown number of packages possibly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I apologize up front for the length of this post, but am trying to max
> the info for brave souls who may be able to help me...
>
> An upgrade initially using apt-get then finished with deselect has
> left an unknow
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 11:51:02PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > 2) And why didn't the dist-upgrade not configure things initially? Would
> > "dpkg --configure -a" be a better choice if it happened again?
>
> If you had noted the error messa
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2) And why didn't the dist-upgrade not configure things initially? Would
> "dpkg --configure -a" be a better choice if it happened again?
If you had noted the error messages you would have known that something
had failed. In that instance the best t
I apologize up front for the length of this post, but am trying to max the
info for brave souls who may be able to help me...
An upgrade initially using apt-get then finished with deselect has left an
unknown number of packages possibly not upgraded. Slink-->potato, BTW.
The long story: (the bi
Even easier work around:
$ apt-get upgrade libreadline
$ apt-get upgrade bash
Get the readline first.
--
Eric G. Miller
Powered by the POTATO (http://www.debian.org)!
Hi, all. I am a more or less experienced debian user, and I want to share this
with you;
I went through a few "minor" problems, when I recently decided that I had
scr*wed up my
system(Potato) and it was time for a reinstall.
I reinstalled from a set of Slink CDs, and proceeded to do an apt-get upd
Hi Mark,
You're right, I'm spoiled with inexpensive net access. I didn't realize
that companies were offering ftp mirror snapshots on CD across the pond
because of the high price of connectivity to download files.
I've been working for telecommunication companies for almost the last 10
years, s
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 03:48:35AM -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote:
> I don't understand your cost analysis. Potato is not release yet, and as
> far as I know, there aren't any commercial outlets for Potato CD's yet.
> I don't think Official Potato CD's are available from anyone yet... which
> is as i
Nathan Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phillip,
>
> I don't understand your cost analysis. Potato is not release yet, and
> as
> far as I know, there aren't any commercial outlets for Potato CD's
> yet.
> I don't think Official Potato CD's are available from anyone yet...
> which
> is as it
Phillip,
I don't understand your cost analysis. Potato is not release yet, and as
far as I know, there aren't any commercial outlets for Potato CD's yet.
I don't think Official Potato CD's are available from anyone yet... which
is as it should be.
So what were you comparing your dialup costs t
Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why not use APT? Here's my /etc/apt/sources.list:
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US/main
> non-US/contrib n
> on-US/non-free
>
> To upgrade: "apt-get updat
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 03:11:33PM -0600, Cheshire wrote:
> Hey all, I'm in the process of grabbing the lib/base/admin and a few
> other dirs of files for a potato upgrade from slink. By nature of
> dependancies, it can take a few times through dpkg -i to get everything
> install
Hey all, I'm in the process of grabbing the lib/base/admin and a few
other dirs of files for a potato upgrade from slink. By nature of
dependancies, it can take a few times through dpkg -i to get everything
installed properly and I was thinking of scripting the process but I've
ne
Thanks for the clarification.
Doug
Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> >> "Doug" == Doug Thistlethwaite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Doug> password file (I don't even remember if it was an option at that
> Doug> time). I think the latest version set the system up to use
> Doug> passwords, but the fil
>> "Doug" == Doug Thistlethwaite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug> password file (I don't even remember if it was an option at that
Doug> time). I think the latest version set the system up to use
Doug> passwords, but the file didn't have the users or passwords
Doug> available.
And it can't. SMB
d. After that,
> it seems to work fine.
>
> Craig
>
> > --
> > From: Doug Thistlethwaite
> > Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 2:12 AM
> > To: Lewis, James M.; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Cc: Doug Work
> > Subject: Re:
Thanks for the information!
The smbclient is in its own package.
I fixed my samba installation by re-creating the password file for samba. I
think
that the problem was that when I first installed samba, I did not use a separate
password file (I don't even remember if it was an option at that ti
>> "Doug" == Doug Thistlethwaite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug> One more thing about Samba. Does anyone know why the
Doug> distribution does not have all of the tools that are described
Doug> on the samba site.
Because the package has been broken up.
Doug> There is a file that describes a se
Subject: Re: samba password changes after potato upgrade
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 11:19:16PM -0700
In reply to:Doug Thistlethwaite
Quoting Doug Thistlethwaite([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> One more thing about Samba. Does anyone know why the distribution does not
> have all
&g
Doug Thistlethwaite
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 2:12 AM
> To: Lewis, James M.; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: Doug Work
> Subject: Re: samba password changes after potato upgrade
>
> Ok, I upgraded to 2.2.10 kernel but my Samba still does not recognise my
> Ok, I upgraded to 2.2.10 kernel but my Samba still does not recognise my
> passwords
> from my win 95 system.
>
> My old samba configuration used plain text passwords if my memory serves
> me right. I
> think there was a problem with encription of passwords when I first
> installed it. If
> t
One more thing about Samba. Does anyone know why the distribution does not
have all
of the tools that are described on the samba site. There is a file that
describes a
set of steps to debug problems like I am having. The third step call for the
use of
smbclient which is not in any of the deb
Ok, I upgraded to 2.2.10 kernel but my Samba still does not recognise my
passwords
from my win 95 system.
My old samba configuration used plain text passwords if my memory serves me
right. I
think there was a problem with encription of passwords when I first installed
it. If
this is the case,
Subject: Re: samba password changes after potato upgrade
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 05:10:07PM -0700
In reply to:Doug Thistlethwaite
Quoting Doug Thistlethwaite([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Humm. I was using 2.0.36 with slink and it worked fine. I will checkout the
> kernel u
Humm. I was using 2.0.36 with slink and it worked fine. I will checkout the
kernel upgrade and see what is up. How stable is 2.2.10?
Doug
"Lewis, James M." wrote:
> > After upgrading my system to potato, my samba services no longer work.
> > I get an error message saying that the password sup
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
