Re: Potato inconsistency

1999-12-22 Thread peter karlsson
Santiago Vila Doncel: > Yes, it has been reported 14 times(!). I almost thought it would be, so I didn't file a bug report myself... > I'm very sorry for the inconvenience. base-files_2.1.12 fixes it. Yup, worked fine with that one! -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

Re: Potato inconsistency

1999-12-21 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, peter karlsson wrote: > Got this during today's apt-get dist-upgrade: > > Preparing to replace base-files 2.1.10 (using .../base-files_2.1.11_all.deb) > ...Unpacking replacement base-files ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_2.1.11_all.deb > (--un

Re: Potato inconsistency

1999-12-20 Thread Gary Hennigan
Ben Lutgens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:00:37PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > > > > Preparing to replace base-files 2.1.10 (using .../base-files_2.1.11_all.deb) > > ...Unpacking replacement base-files ... > > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_2

Re: Potato inconsistency

1999-12-20 Thread Ben Lutgens
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:00:37PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > > Preparing to replace base-files 2.1.10 (using .../base-files_2.1.11_all.deb) > ...Unpacking replacement base-files ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_2.1.11_all.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrit

Potato inconsistency

1999-12-20 Thread peter karlsson
Got this during today's apt-get dist-upgrade: Preparing to replace base-files 2.1.10 (using .../base-files_2.1.11_all.deb) ...Unpacking replacement base-files ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_2.1.11_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/inputrc', which is als