Try pg_lsclusters to see which postgresql servers are running and listening
on which ports.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
Hi all
I am trying to setup a postgresql 9.4 database on Debian Jessie. It
worked well on testing with postgresql 9.6 from the repos and then I
already could connect with
$ sudo -u postgres psql
I would like to use Jessie but when I try the same on stable with
postgresql 9.4, this is what I get
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:42:24PM +0100, Robert Bude wrote:
> but how i can install squeeze and are the packages in aktuell squeeze
> mirrors ? and were to get squeeze mirror ? ;)
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSqueeze
Squeeze is archived (no longer supported, even under "LTS"), so follow
the in
Hi, we want to install a postgres 8.4 server but can not find via
apt-get in wheezy or jessie the packages.
How i can install a postgres 8.4 server with minimal effort ?
i do not want a detailed instruction only the short track ;)
eg.: install squeeze, install lts repo , and then you have
; fatal: No such remote 'master'
>>
>> I am not a GIT specialist, but in order to get all the branches, do only
>> that:
>> git remote add -f pgxc git://
>> postgres-xc.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/postgres-xc/postgres-xc
>>
>> You will be able t
emote set-branches --add master pgxc/master
> fatal: No such remote 'master'
>
I am not a GIT specialist, but in order to get all the branches, do only
that:
git remote add -f pgxc git://
postgres-xc.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/postgres-xc/postgres-xc
You will be able to see all
data looks correct, half of it being due to the data in
> doc-xc/.
>
> $ git remote set-branches --add master pgxc/master
>> fatal: No such remote 'master'
>
> I am not a GIT specialist, but in order to get all the branches, do only
> that:
> git remote add -f pgxc
On 2/13/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Here's what I just tried:
>
> cd postgresql.git/
> git remote add -f --tags -m master pgxc
> git://postgres-xc.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/postgres-xc/postgres-xc
Please note, the above two lines should be one, forgot to manually for
Here's what I just tried:
cd postgresql.git/
git remote add -f --tags -m master pgxc
git://postgres-xc.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/postgres-xc/postgres-xc
# this resulted in only 8.6MiB download just now,
# on an up-to-date pg.git repo.
#view results:
git remote -v
git branch -a
In my
fyi..
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Paquier
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:59:54 +0900
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Does somone know the object overlap likely between pg and pgxc
> repositories?
>
> I ask because I could just git clone pgxc, or I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/11 12:36, kuLa wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm having crazy problem which I can't solve.
> Basically I have 12 sets (master + slave) of postgres on Lenny. Master
> is shipping WAL files into slaves where they are applied. Easy
i all,
> I'm having crazy problem which I can't solve.
> Basically I have 12 sets (master + slave) of postgres on Lenny. Master
> is shipping WAL files into slaves where they are applied. Easy pesy
> works perfectly, except 1 set where I even can't bring up postgres on slave.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm having crazy problem which I can't solve.
Basically I have 12 sets (master + slave) of postgres on Lenny. Master
is shipping WAL files into slaves where they are applied. Easy pesy
works perfectly, except 1 set where I even can&
Thank You for Your time and answer, Jochen:
> Ok, so the installed package is broken. What message do you get when
> you try to reinstall that package?
Well. I have installed again:
postgresql-client-common
postgresql-common
, did change ownership (user and group to postgres) of my clust
Sthu Deus:
> Jochen:
>>
>> Why do you use dpkg for that? Have you tried apt-get or aptitude? I
>> guess they will do what you want to achieve.
>>
>> J.
>
> I've tried that already. Please check this:
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> postgresql-8.3 [8.3.11-0lenny1] postgresql-cli
Thank You for Your time and answer, Jochen:
> Sthu Deus:
> >
> > I can not remove the following:
> >
> > $ sudo /usr/bin/dpkg -r postgresql-8.3 postgresql-client-8.3
>
> Why do you use dpkg for that? Have you tried apt-get or aptitude? I
> guess they will do what you want to achieve.
>
> J.
I
tually
this is the very reason why I remove postgres - I need it, but it
is of no worth to me as long as it does not work - it just takes my
disc space.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Sthu Deus:
>
> I can not remove the following:
>
> $ sudo /usr/bin/dpkg -r postgresql-8.3 postgresql-client-8.3
Why do you use dpkg for that? Have you tried apt-get or aptitude? I
guess they will do what you want to achieve.
J.
--
Americans have a better life.
[Agree] [Disagree]
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I can not remove the following:
>
> $ sudo /usr/bin/dpkg -r postgresql-8.3 postgresql-client-8.3
> Removing postgresql-8.3 ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/postgresql-8.3.prerm: line
> 17: /usr/share/postgresql-common/maintscripts-functions:
Good day.
I can not remove the following:
$ sudo /usr/bin/dpkg -r postgresql-8.3 postgresql-client-8.3
Removing postgresql-8.3 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/postgresql-8.3.prerm: line
17: /usr/share/postgresql-common/maintscripts-functions: No such file
or directory dpkg: error processing postgresql-8.3
Thank You for Your time and answer, debu...@acrasis.net:
>On 2010-01-31 13:43, Sthu Deus wrote:
>> 2010-01-31 13:31:03 GMT-7 LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket: Address already
>> in use
>> 2010-01-31 13:31:03 GMT-7 HINT: Is another postmaster already
>> running on port 5432? If not, wait a few sec
On 2010-01-31 13:43, Sthu Deus wrote:
> 2010-01-31 13:31:03 GMT-7 LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket: Address already
> in use
> 2010-01-31 13:31:03 GMT-7 HINT: Is another postmaster already
> running on port 5432? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.
> 2010-01-31 13:31:03 GMT-7 WARNING: could not
Good day.
Please, help me to run my postgres DB.
Here is problem description.
I have 2 instances in /var/lib/postgresql/8.3:
main
mine
When I start postgres server w/ command:
/etc/init.d/postgresql-8.3 start
I get:
Starting PostgreSQL 8.3 database server: main mineThe PostgreSQL server
will trillich wrote:
> on debian 4.0, apt-get update && apt-get upgrade led to a problem
> where postgres 7 won't start! apparently utility program
> "pg_controldata" is supposed to generate some locale-info that's
> parsed by perl script "pg_ctlclust
on debian 4.0, apt-get update && apt-get upgrade led to a problem
where postgres 7 won't start! apparently utility program
"pg_controldata" is supposed to generate some locale-info that's
parsed by perl script "pg_ctlcluster", and the two suddenly don&
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:45:46AM +0530, Jaisen N.D. wrote:
> I have another problem with postgresql 8.1.
> initdb: directory "/var/lib/postgresql/data" exists but is not empty
> If you want to create a new database system, either remove or empty
> the directory "/var/lib/postgresql/data" or run i
I have another problem with postgresql 8.1. I have uninstalled the
postgresql-8.3 and removed its configuration files, and the user postgres
also. Then installed postgresql-8.1. But when I started to create a
database, it shows some message like this..
Here is the output I got
I have another problem with postgresql 8.1. I have uninstalled the
postgresql-8.3 and removed its configuration files, and the user postgres
also. Then installed postgresql-8.1. But when I started to create a
database, it shows some message like this..
Here is the output I got
Hi
It seems like the older version of pgadmin3 don't play well with
postgres 8.3. The postgres people suggest (recommend) using version 1.8.
But it seems like we can't have version 1.8 or anything greater than
version 1.4 because wxwidgets isn't being maintained (well that is
Hi John,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:05:42PM +, John Masters wrote:
> I've chmod 666 /dev/null and now postgres installs OK. However I
> hesitate to go further as this server is on a VPS. Could that be why the
> perms were not set properly?
I can think of no reason why anyone w
On 19:14 Sun 07 Oct , Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 16:35:44 +, John Masters wrote:
> > On 16:04 Sun 07 Oct, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 13:49:11 +, John Masters wrote:
> > > > I have posted
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 16:35:44 +, John Masters wrote:
> On 16:04 Sun 07 Oct, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 13:49:11 +, John Masters wrote:
> > > I have posted this to the Postgres list also.
> > >
> > > Cannot get Postgres 8.2 wo
On 16:04 Sun 07 Oct , Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 13:49:11 +, John Masters wrote:
> > I have posted this to the Postgres list also.
> >
> > Cannot get Postgres 8.2 working on Debian sid using the Debian package.
> > At the config stage I get
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 13:49:11 +, John Masters wrote:
> I have posted this to the Postgres list also.
>
> Cannot get Postgres 8.2 working on Debian sid using the Debian package.
> At the config stage I get a message telling me to run:-
>
> pg_createcluster 8.2 main
I have posted this to the Postgres list also.
Cannot get Postgres 8.2 working on Debian sid using the Debian package.
At the config stage I get a message telling me to run:-
pg_createcluster 8.2 main --start
Doing this (as root) produces the following output:-
Creating new cluster
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:36:45AM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade from 8.1 to 8.2.
>
> Apparently the upgrade I just ran through installed a second database
> on my server.
>
> I was hoping that the debian configuration would migrate this for me.
> I recall there was once a t
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:36:45AM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> Meanwhile, can I just use pg_dumpall to pull from 8.1 and then reload
> into 8.2?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item3.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
I'm trying to upgrade from 8.1 to 8.2.
Apparently the upgrade I just ran through installed a second database
on my server.
I was hoping that the debian configuration would migrate this for me.
I recall there was once a time when it would ask you about moving
data from old to new databases.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/07 12:26, David Baron wrote:
> OK, I withdraw the question. Will find useful answers elsewhere or stay with
> OpenOffice's DB (as I said, not all that bad!).
>
> The flame war has gotten too ugly. I think we can argue about the merits of
>
OK, I withdraw the question. Will find useful answers elsewhere or stay with
OpenOffice's DB (as I said, not all that bad!).
The flame war has gotten too ugly. I think we can argue about the merits of
one of the other programs with a bit more common courtesy and civility and
end the discussion
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:26:13PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> >Really? What should I learn? I've given specific things where your
> >knowledge of/experience with databases is clearly deficient. Care to
> >be specific and refrain from making sweeping statements
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/02/07 07:54, Dan H. wrote:
>> Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
>>> 5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
>>> choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
>>> the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct befo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/07 07:54, Dan H. wrote:
> Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
>> 5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
>> choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
>> the date which is sent to the database is d
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> 5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
> choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
> the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
> inserting.
This is one of the most pathetic things I've eve
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> 5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
> choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
> the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
> inserting.
This is one of the most pathetic things I've eve
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> 5. Again back to your example, yes, the PayPal web site offers you to
> choose the data by using a combo box and not inserting it manually. So
> the date which is sent to the database is definitely correct before
> inserting.
This is one of the most pathetic things I've eve
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:15:31PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
> 1. The one who should learn something is you, and not me. So, I would
> suggest you to learn something basic about database concepts and I don't
> care if you ever come back or not!
Really? What should I learn? I've given spec
1. The one who should learn something is you, and not me. So, I would
suggest you to learn something basic about database concepts and I don't
care if you ever come back or not!
2. You do not have to involve yourself in any single topic you see in
the forum, specially if you are not asked to d
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:10:27PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>
> But you're coming from an angle where people know or must learn all of
> that just before they're able to even start. Don't you see how not
> having to learn that is faster for some people?
>
Ever have to share the road with so
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:53:52AM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
> What a useless and boring discussion you have started Ron!! Do you have
> to just be against everyone who thinks MySQL has at least some good
> features too? I just dropped the discussion when realized that it goes
> nowhere, but i
or Microsoft? Or maybe you're an MCSE?
>>
>> It's confirmed. You *are* an MCSE.
>
> For that I may implement my next database with MySQL (instead of
> Postgres like planned), just to spite you.
I'll live.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
next database with MySQL (instead of
Postgres like planned), just to spite you.
--
Angelo Bertolli
Please remove my email address from your post when replying
[Tech http://bitfreedom.com | Gaming http://heroesonly.com]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
e two are just different.
>>>
>> Mostly in letting people do rapid development without requiring a lot of
>> forethought in database design. I know, I know, my argument is a lot
>
> That splatting noise is my hurl splatting onto the opposite wall.
>
> Remi
now, my argument is a lot
>
> That splatting noise is my hurl splatting onto the opposite wall.
>
> Remind me never to hire you.
Was that 3rd normal form?
> > weaker these days with improvements made to Postgres. Legacy counts too
> > in this case because when th
ifferent.
>>
>
> Mostly in letting people do rapid development without requiring a lot of
> forethought in database design. I know, I know, my argument is a lot
That splatting noise is my hurl splatting onto the opposite wall.
Remind me never to hire you.
> weaker these day
ow, I know, my argument is a lot
weaker these days with improvements made to Postgres. Legacy counts too
in this case because when there is a big MySQL userbase out there that
means more support. But, as you said before, that's not a technical merit.
MySQL is to the database world what PHP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 17:03, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:37:39PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
[snip]
> Yes, they were "fast" when computers were still slow. Unfortunately,
> many people were willing to give up data integrity in excha
issue MySQL wins
> because you can have it under the GPL. Postgres is under BSD. (I guess
> that's arguable, but we are on a Debian list after all.)
>
It depends on whether your definition of "freeness" is biased toward
developers or end users.
Basically, on technical merits, MyS
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
>
> (1) MySQL is shown to be faster in a single-user environment than
> Postgres, especially with complicated SELECT statements
>
IIRC, this does not hold for transactional tables. So, we are back to
the "if you
shown to be faster in a single-user environment than
Postgres, especially with complicated SELECT statements
(2) MySQL is a shorter learning curve for new users
I think MSFT used to use those same arguments about why people
should use Windows
The fundamental difference is licensing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 07:31, Max Hyre wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>>> In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
>>> "The reason for using the preceding rules in non-stric
t;
> (1) MySQL is shown to be faster in a single-user environment than
> Postgres, especially with complicated SELECT statements
>
> (2) MySQL is a shorter learning curve for new users
I think MSFT used to use those same arguments about why people
should use Windows
[snip]
>
like "MySQL
is definitely your best choice" kind of answer with no clear indication
as to why MySQL is a better choice in this case, so I'll give a couple
of reasons:
(1) MySQL is shown to be faster in a single-user environment than
Postgres, especially with complicated SELECT state
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:18:23PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Never expected to start a flame-war over this.
>
Hey. We're here to help :-)
> I need visual tools to set the stuff up and run it and they are not evident.
>
Hmm. I like to work from the commandline. If I find myself needing to
"b
Never expected to start a flame-war over this.
I need visual tools to set the stuff up and run it and they are not evident.
Actually, the OpenOffice database is not at all bad (except that it imports
empty spreadsheet items as blanks (NOT EMPTY, NOT NULL). It can be readilly
queried, reports ge
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>
>> In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
>>
>> "The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict
>> mode is that we can't check these conditions until the
>> statement has begu
On Thursday, 01.02.2007 at 06:18 +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> About allowing corrupted data, it is not the responsibility of database
> engine to verify if the data is valid or not since the database engine
> only "Manages" data and not validate.
It depends what you mean by 'validate'. The da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 23:18, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>>
[snip]
> Maybe MySQL is not the best database engine in the world but it is one
> the best engines. I have wor
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:18:03AM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
> Maybe MySQL is not the best database engine in the world but it is one
> the best engines. I have worked on MySQL for several years and from four
> years ago I have started to develop my own database engine inspired by
> MySQL.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
"The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict mode is that we can't
check these conditions until the statement has begun executing.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:54:01PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>
> In that same document, they give the reason for doing so:
>
> "The reason for using the preceding rules in non-strict mode is that we can't
> check these conditions until the statement has begun executing. We can't just
> rol
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:50:14PM -0900, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > How do I get started here?
> >
> > First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
>
> Please stop this MySQL vs. PostgreSQL bashing. Eac
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 15:27, Ron Johnson wrote:
> You're talking to someone who's been a DBA for 10 years; you will
> not win this argument.
Eh, so ya got three years on me. :)
j
--
Joshua Kugler
Lead System Admin -- Senior Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 17:54, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 01/31/07 16:50, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> How do I get started here?
Fi
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/31/07 16:50, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >>> How do I get started here?
> >>
> >> First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
> >
> > Please sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 16:50, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>> How do I get started here?
>> First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
>
> Please stop this MySQL vs. Postgre
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > How do I get started here?
>
> First. Please do not use MySQL, unless you don't care about your data.
Please stop this MySQL vs. PostgreSQL bashing. Each has their place. If
users of MySQL don't care about their data, then I gue
first line in the spreadsheet. This can, indeed, be queried, sort of.
>
> I would like to get this data into a Postgres or MySQL database. Using
> pgadmin3, I cannot get a connection connected. Does not accept my password.
> Their docs cited Debian problems here and recommended md5 au
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/07 12:29, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
[snip]
> MySQL is definitely best choice. If you have not still installed
> latest version of MySQL do it as following:
Well, if you *insist* on starting a war, so be it.
MySQL is a toy pie
indeed, be queried, sort of.
>
> I would like to get this data into a Postgres or MySQL database. Using
> pgadmin3, I cannot get a connection connected. Does not accept my password.
> Their docs cited Debian problems here and recommended md5 authorization.
> Tried that. No ava
eadsheet. This can, indeed, be queried, sort of.
>
> I would like to get this data into a Postgres or MySQL database. Using
> pgadmin3, I cannot get a connection connected. Does not accept my password.
> Their docs cited Debian problems here and recommended md5 authorization.
> T
this data into a Postgres or MySQL database. Using
pgadmin3, I cannot get a connection connected. Does not accept my password.
Their docs cited Debian problems here and recommended md5 authorization.
Tried that. No avail. One can also simply say trust (localhost only). No
avail.
How do I get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/07 12:24, Attila Horvath wrote:
> Hi
>
> I downloaded pgAmin III so I can view my postgress DB remotely.
>
> What is the default username/password where installed apt packages are
> managed?
Huh?
Do you mean the username and password of th
Hi
I downloaded pgAmin III so I can view my postgress DB remotely.
What is the default username/password where installed apt packages are managed?
Thx Attila
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/15/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check if you have the following two lines in your
/etc/network/interfaces:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
Had 2 add 'auto lo' in that file as it was missing. This solved the
problem perfectly.
My utmost thanks 2 everyone.
Regards
--
Ab
ping is disjoint and not important to
getting postgres to work with unix domain sockets.
--
Matt Zagrabelny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (218) 726 8844
University of Minnesota Duluth
Information Technology Systems & Services
PGP key 1024D/84E22DA2 2005-11-07
Fingerprint: 78F9 18B3 EF58 56F5 FC85 C5CA 5
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 20:46:59 +0600, Abu Zaher wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> >
> >Is /etc/init.d/postgresql-8.1 starting __after__ networking?
> >
> >Yes, that's right. I found out that after my pc boots up, if i try iptraf,
> i cant see any lo, i.e. any loopback interfaces. Only a
On 1/15/07, Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is /etc/init.d/postgresql-8.1 starting __after__ networking?
Yes, that's right. I found out that after my pc boots up, if i try iptraf,
i cant see any lo, i.e. any loopback interfaces. Only after I run
network-admin, i can se the lo, then if
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 10:10:59AM +0600, Abu Zaher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currnetly running Debian Sid. When my system boots up, I get this error:
>
> psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory Is the server
> running locally and accepting connections on Unix domain socket
> "/va
Hi,
I'm currnetly running Debian Sid. When my system boots up, I get this error:
psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory Is the server
running locally and accepting connections on Unix domain socket
"/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"?
So i cant run postgresql. Moreover, wh
wd”
Thanks anyway
iuri
_
From: Iuri Sampaio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 12:08 AM
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: users info
Hi everyone
What’s the file where the users info are located? Passwords, ids, …
I need to change t
password
> hostall all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 password
> seems to matter not a whit. no difference in results -- empty either way.
>
> we made sure postgres db user had a password, and used that to add
> other users (
es
'--with-zlib' '--without-pgsql'
how do we enable postgresql-from-php? we've installed the various php stuff:
ii libapache2-mod-php5 5.1.2-1.dotdeb.2 PHP 5
scripting language - apache 2.0 module
ii php5-pgsql 5.1.2-1.dotde
meuser
hostall all 127.0.0.1/32 md5
or the README recommendations of
local all all password
hostall all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 password
seems to matter not a whit. no difference in resu
much taken care
> of by the apt-get install process. (we did add "AcceptPathInfo on"
> according to the instrux, as we're using apache2.)
>
> haven't found anything informative in the postgres logs, at all, and
> apache logs reflect that it's doing what
up nice as
you please) and all the way down to step 8 is pretty much taken care
of by the apt-get install process. (we did add "AcceptPathInfo on"
according to the instrux, as we're using apache2.)
haven't found anything informative in the postgres logs, at all, and
apache log
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:25:52PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> The 7.2 and 7,4 directories contain conf files, libraries and binaries
> that appear like they belong to postgres. The stuff under preserve is
> obviously a backup from when I upgraded from Woody to Sarge. My
>
I have the following directory structure under /var/lib/postgres on my
server:
$ sudo find /var/lib/postgres/ -type d
/var/lib/postgres/
/var/lib/postgres/data
/var/lib/postgres/data/base
/var/lib/postgres/data/base/1
/var/lib/postgres/data/base/17141
/var/lib/postgres/data/base/17142
/var/lib
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:13:54PM +0200, Stephan Meyen wrote:
> Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > If you must use embedded SQL, the libecpg-dev package includes/depends
> > on the necessary libraries, headers, and ESQL preprocessor (ecpg).
> >
>
> No, I have already tried that package...
According to
Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Are you compiling legacy embedded SQL, or are you developing new code?
> Embedded SQL was one of those bad ideas that existed because there was
> nothing better at the time. Nowadays I'd recommend using either ODBC
> (see unixodbc, unixodbc-bin, unixodbc-dev, and odbc-post
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
