On 15/03/12 06:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
Dom wrote:
Not quite sure why this isn't a depends or suggests of the nfs server
package. Perhaps someone can enlighten me?
But it does.
$ apt-cache show nfs-kernel-server | grep --color nfs-common
Depends: libblkid1 (>= 2.16), libc6 (>= 2.3), libnf
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Sian Mountbatten
wrote:
>
> I is trying to set up NFS for my LAN. The NFS-HOWTO says that portmap,
> usually resident in /sbin or /usr/sbin, is essential as it has to be
> started first. Well, I don't have it and it does not appear in the
>
-13.3)
In recent versions it has changed dependencies from portmap to
rpcbind. Not sure why or what is different between those programs but
in theory they are equivalent and provide the same functionality.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 14/03/12 18:41, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Hello All
I is trying to set up NFS for my LAN. The NFS-HOWTO says that portmap,
usually resident in /sbin or /usr/sbin, is essential as it has to be
started first. Well, I don't have it and it does not appear in the
Contents-i386.gz for s
2012/3/14 Sian Mountbatten
> Hello All
>
> I is trying to set up NFS for my LAN. The NFS-HOWTO says that portmap,
> usually resident in /sbin or /usr/sbin, is essential as it has to be
> started first. Well, I don't have it and it does not appear in the
> Cont
Hello All
I is trying to set up NFS for my LAN. The NFS-HOWTO says that portmap,
usually resident in /sbin or /usr/sbin, is essential as it has to be
started first. Well, I don't have it and it does not appear in the
Contents-i386.gz for sid on ftp.uk.debian.org.
So has it been super
Charles Blair put forth on 6/26/2010 8:35 AM:
>I tried to upgrade to lenny using an ethernet connection. The
> process stopped when the monitor displayed "trying to update portmap 5-26"
>
>After a few minutes, I pressed control-C and the upgrade seemed to
>
I tried to upgrade to lenny using an ethernet connection. The
process stopped when the monitor displayed "trying to update portmap 5-26"
After a few minutes, I pressed control-C and the upgrade seemed to
continue. The resulting system seems to work, but when I try to use
aptit
Howdy folks!
I've been investigating an issue we're having over here and I can't seem
to find anything on the web about it, so I'm asking you fine folks :)
A couple of days ago one of our servers was having some strange nfs
locking issues, and I noticed portmap wasn'
Larry Gonzalez wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Eric P wrote:
>
>>> I'm running Etch.
>>>
>>> I noticed recently that the boot process gets stuck on "Starting
>>> portmap daemon: portmap".
>>>
>>> After a few minutes, I hit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Eric P wrote:
I'm running Etch.
I noticed recently that the boot process gets stuck on "Starting portmap daemon:
portmap".
After a few minutes, I hit ctrl-C and it continues booting.
Any ideas?
yes...
I'm running Etch.
I noticed recently that the boot process gets stuck on "Starting portmap
daemon: portmap".
After a few minutes, I hit ctrl-C and it continues booting.
Any ideas?
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Andrew Diakin wrote:
I don't want remove portmap, sometimes i need it for nfs and this is
not best decision to install portmap every time I need it. Where I
must look for startup scripts for portmap, in rc2.d/ no link to
init.d/portmap
Instead of completely removing the link, did yo
I don't want remove portmap, sometimes i need it for nfs and this is
not best decision to install portmap every time I need it. Where I
must look for startup scripts for portmap, in rc2.d/ no link to
init.d/portmap
2005/8/22, Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On (22/08/05 21:44),
On (22/08/05 21:44), Andrew Diakin wrote:
> Hello, I remove symlink from rc2.d/, my init is 2, but after reboot
> portmap was started .What I must do with this? I don't want portmap in
> second level...
>
$ aptitude remove portmap
should do the trick, or:
$ aptitude purge
Hello, I remove symlink from rc2.d/, my init is 2, but after reboot
portmap was started .What I must do with this? I don't want portmap in
second level...
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Matthew Lenz wrote:
> Are these services needed if I don't intend to use NFS on any of my
> machines? Also, I do have a couple servers that need portmap (i guess some
> licensing service needs it for one software package we run) but does that
> also
Are these services needed if I don't intend to use NFS on any of my
machines? Also, I do have a couple servers that need portmap (i guess some
licensing service needs it for one software package we run) but does that
also mean that I need statd? .. just trying to minimize the running ser
--- On Sat 06/05, Stephen Patterson < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Stephen Patterson [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 13:53:24 +0100
Subject: Re: How do I stop portmap from listening on port 111 on my internet
connection?
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 04
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 04:30:10 +0200, Jerome Werner wrote:
> I'm using Debian unstable. I use gnome so I need FAM, which in turn needs portmap.
> That's fine with me but I don't want portmap to listen on port 111. I
> read man portmap and famd but didn't find what I wa
I'm using Debian unstable. I use gnome so I need FAM, which in turn needs portmap.
That's fine with me but I don't want portmap to listen on port 111. I read man portmap
and famd but didn't find what I was looking for? Also I don't want to just block it
with a firew
I'm having issues cleanly shutting down my system which has an nfs mounted
root file system.
The Portmapper and/or network if are being closed prior to the root file
system being unmounted. I've included the relevant error messages.
What is the correct way of doing this ?
Broadcast message fro
;
> what exactly IS portmap? Stripping down a mailserver to its bare minimum
> and is a little puzzled about the man description. It contemplates
> "programs" as a term in general and is not very specific for someone not
> that experienced with the internals of Linux and other O
Niclas Söderlund said:
> Hi,
>
> what exactly IS portmap? Stripping down a mailserver to its bare minimum
> and is a little puzzled about the man description. It contemplates
> "programs" as a term in general and is not very specific for someone not
> that experienced
Hi,
what exactly IS portmap? Stripping down a mailserver to its bare minimum
and is a little puzzled about the man description. It contemplates
"programs" as a term in general and is not very specific for someone not
that experienced with the internals of Linux and other OS's
mdevin said:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/portmap.prerm: /etc/init.d/portmap: Permission denied
next i would edit that script and remove references to that file
and try again
nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 18:16:00 -0800, nate wrote:
> mdevin said:
>
> > /etc/init.d/portmap: No such file or directorydpkg: warning - old
> > pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from
> > the new package instead ...
> > /var/lib/
mdevin said:
> /etc/init.d/portmap: No such file or directorydpkg: warning - old
> pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from
> the new package instead ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/prerm: /etc/init.d/portmap: No such file or
> directory dpkg: error
mdevin wrote:
I seem to have gotten dpkg into an inconsistent state for the portmap
package. I can't install it and I can't remove it either.
I have tried the following:
apt-get install portmap
apt-get -f install portmap
apt-get remove portmap --purge
apt-get install portmap --f
I seem to have gotten dpkg into an inconsistent state for the portmap
package. I can't install it and I can't remove it either.
I have tried the following:
apt-get install portmap
apt-get -f install portmap
apt-get remove portmap --purge
apt-get install portmap --fix-missing
Should
Can one specify/restrict the range of high numbered ports used
by portmapper for nfs?
I'm aware of /etc/sysctl.conf:
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = MIN MAX
but I would like to force the portmapper to use ports _outside_
this range in order to close them by a (non-stateful) firewall.
Please CC to
On Monday Aug 27, 22:45 john doe wrote:
>Hi.
>
>Just a simple question, what programs need "portmap"?
>
>I've tried to somehow remove it from my installation, but I have not been
>able to find it.
>
>Thanks.
Portmap is a part of netbase. You can see thi
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 08:45:48PM +, john doe wrote:
> Just a simple question, what programs need "portmap"?
The two main portmapper clients are NFS and NIS.
> I've tried to somehow remove it from my installation, but I have not been
> able to find it.
`dpkg -S por
Hi.
Just a simple question, what programs need "portmap"?
I've tried to somehow remove it from my installation, but I have not been
able to find it.
Thanks.
- andreas -
PS. do not email me directly as I&#x
What are your firewall rules set at?
What do /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny look like?
Is ps aux showing that portmap is running?
Does /var/log/syslog have anything to say about failures to run daemons?
Does /etc/resolv.conf point to static nameservers or are you dialing in
with ppp and
I really don't know what has happened. I upgraded my debian system last
night to unstable, and when I booted today, everything seems broken. For
instance, on bootup, iptables spits out a whole bunch of errors, and I get
this:
'portmapper inactive - RPC services unavailable'
I can log on to the ne
d remove, though. If you ever upgrade your system
>> it will restore all the symlinks to the default configuration. Instead
>> just remove the 'S' symlinks (the ones that start portmap) by hand.
>> Leave the 'K' symlinks. If you leave some symlinks in place then
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:59:40AM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> i spoze i should've been more clear--
>
> is there a debian-friendly way to permanently disable
> a startup (/etc/init.d/*) service so's some future
> "apt-get dist-upgrade" doesn't resurrect it from the grave?
>
>
such a streamlined apt-friendly distribution. what's the
> > debian way of purging-inits-for-posterity?
>
> dpkg --purge
>
> With Potato, I seemed to remember I couldn't really get rid of the
> package that contained portmap for some reason (a dependency or
> something)
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:00:29AM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:32:28PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:11:25PM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> > > What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
> > &g
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:32:28PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:11:25PM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> > What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
> > update-rc.d remove it?
>
> If you're not using NFS or NIS then you ca
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:11:25PM +0600, V.Suresh wrote:
> What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
>update-rc.d remove it?
If you're not using NFS or NIS then you can safely remove it. Those are
the 2 main services that need it.
Don't use update-rc.
What is the portmap process meant for? Shall I safely
update-rc.d remove it?
-V.Suresh. Sureshvuserssourceforgenet
Http://www16.brinkster.com/vsuresh
--
---Powered by Debian Potato---
8:10pm up 3 min, 2 users, load average: 0.03
Anybody have any thoughts on what's causing the following message and how
to correct it?
portmap: too small RPC reply size (0 bytes)
portmap: too small RPC reply size (0 bytes)
lockd_up: makesock failed, error=-5
portmap: too small RPC reply size (0 bytes)
lockd_up: no pid, 2 users??
portmap
just about that ;)
when entering a runlevel, the daemon basically goes through each file in
/etc/rcx.d that starts with S and runs it like this:
S90startstuff start
note the start argument. Then when leaving it does the same thing with
the K's saying stop.
They are run in numerical order, s
Ahh, update-rc.d was what I was thinking of when I typed
update-alternatives. What the sequence number do?
--- Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also look at the update-rc.d command (see man update-rc.d for
> details).
> That will allow you to do things like:
>
> update-rc.d postres start
Hi All,
I responded to this question and said to use 'update-alternatives' myself. I
meantupdate-rc.d.
Doh!
Jimmy Richards
On Thursday 29 March 2001 14:25, Daniel Freedman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001, Alan Chen wrote:
> > Just as an excercise to my own sys admin knowledge, I'l
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:57:54AM -0800, Alan Chen wrote:
...
> update-alternatives (or was it alternatives-update) is a admin tool for
> adding, removing daemons from various runlevels.
No, it is for managing Debian's alternatives sytem. Like whether vim,
or vi or tiny-vi should be named vi. O
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001, Alan Chen wrote:
> Just as an excercise to my own sys admin knowledge, I'll summarize my
> general knowledge and just ask if anyone has suggestions or differences
> in my understanding.
>
> Daemons (or services) can be manually manipulated in debian using
> /etc/init.d/
Also look at the update-rc.d command (see man update-rc.d for details).
That will allow you to do things like:
update-rc.d postres start 3 (start postres in runlevel 3)
update-rc.d postres stop 50 6 (stop postres at sequence 50 in runlevel
6)
--Rich
Alan Chen wrote:
>
> Just as an excercis
t when booting in any
> runlevel.
>
> Dermot
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:41:58PM +0900, Debian User wrote:
> > A daemon called /sbin/portmap starts when I boot my Debian Linux
> 2.2
> > system.
> >
> > I have searched for the script that starts /sbin/portamp whe
I can see a script to call it on my system in /etc/rcS.d
This directory has scripts that start when booting in any
runlevel.
Dermot
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:41:58PM +0900, Debian User wrote:
> A daemon called /sbin/portmap starts when I boot my Debian Linux 2.2
> system.
>
> I h
Hi There TwinSun,
Try outupdate-alternatives -f portmap remove
The manual way is/etc/init.d/portmap stop
Hope that's what yer looking for,
Jimmy Richards
On 29 Mar 2001 14:41:58 +0900, Debian User wrote:
> A daemon called /sbin/portmap starts when I boot my Debian L
Debian User wrote:
>
> A daemon called /sbin/portmap starts when I boot my Debian Linux 2.2
> system.
>
> I have searched for the script that starts /sbin/portamp when my system
> boots. However, I can't find it. It doesn't seem to be in rc2.d.
>
> Does an
A daemon called /sbin/portmap starts when I boot my Debian Linux 2.2
system.
I have searched for the script that starts /sbin/portamp when my system
boots. However, I can't find it. It doesn't seem to be in rc2.d.
Does anyone know how to make it not start upon booting?
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:37:00AM -0700, Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
> Question --> what is the best approach to stop
> portmap from running on a Debian system?
IIRC, portmap is part of netbase in potato. Renaming the
/etc/init.d/portmap script or removing all the start/stop links
* Randolph S. Kahle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 20010316 17:50 +0100:
> Question --> what is the best approach to stop
> portmap from running on a Debian system?
Stop portmap, then rename /etc/init.d/portmap to
/etc/init.d/portmap_hidden, and it won't come up again.
(This was
dpkg -S portmap will tell you that portmap is included in the netbase package.
If you need other contents of netbase,
> Question --> what is the best approach to stop
> portmap from running on a Debian system?
If you are hesitant to remove the symlink, edit the portmap script and pu
I am converting my firewall machine to a Debian
installation. I am in the process of removing unwanted
services so as to lock down the machine against
intrusions.
I am trying to remove portmap, but this program
does not seem to follow the pattern for other
programs. With other program I simply
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:36:23PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
> once you have disabled portmap, please report to me whether you have
> xdm delays during initlevel 3 login. if yes, then you are suffering
> from the same problem that i have, namely that xdm/X and xfs don't
> commun
once you have disabled portmap, please report to me whether you have
xdm delays during initlevel 3 login. if yes, then you are suffering
from the same problem that i have, namely that xdm/X and xfs don't
communicate via ipc but insist on rpc. and if you don't have that
problem, then i
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:09:23PM -0800, Pann McCuaig wrote:
> $ dpkg -S portmap
> netbase: /sbin/portmap
> netbase: /usr/share/doc/netbase/portmapper.txt.gz
> netbase: /etc/init.d/portmap
> netbase: /usr/share/man/man8/portmap.8.gz
>
> You sure as hell don't wan
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 22:47, Frank Preut wrote:
> hello everyone,
>
> could someone please tell me where i can find portmap, that is,
> which package contains it (i can't find a package named portmap)?? as much
> as i can see i don't need it, and i would like
fishbowl:/home/madduck# dpkg -S \*portmap\*
netbase: /sbin/portmap
netbase: /usr/share/doc/netbase/portmapper.txt.gz
netbase: /etc/init.d/portmap
netbase: /usr/share/man/man8/portmap.8.gz
fishbowl:/home/madduck#
so netbase is what you are looking for and it *should* be installed.
martin
hello everyone,
could someone please tell me where i can find portmap, that is,
which package contains it (i can't find a package named portmap)?? as much
as i can see i don't need it, and i would like to get rid of it (if that
is stupid for some reason, please correct me,
For woody users the situation is different. portmap was removed from
netbase and now has its own package. So the solution is
apt-get install portmap
I'd like to see a warning of some sort. It took me some time to work out
why nfs had stopped working and others seem to having the
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:52:14AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 04:34:21PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > $ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
> > netbase: /etc/init.d/portmap
> >
> > ??
>
> Thanks for the info, but I run woody.
[gimli:~] 4:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 04:34:21PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> $ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
> netbase: /etc/init.d/portmap
>
> ??
Thanks for the info, but I run woody.
Cheers,
Sven
--
"{sum += $2} END {print sum}", said Tom awkwardly.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 06:30:58PM -0600, ktb wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:04:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> >
> > $ dlocate /etc/init.d/portmap
> > $ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
> > dpkg: /etc/init.d/portmap not found.
> >
> > Apparently this
$ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
netbase: /etc/init.d/portmap
??
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:04:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hello
>
> Could anyone tell me what package this file belongs to?
>
> $ dlocate /etc/init.d/portmap
> $ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
> dpkg: /e
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:04:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hello
>
> Could anyone tell me what package this file belongs to?
>
> $ dlocate /etc/init.d/portmap
> $ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
> dpkg: /etc/init.d/portmap not found.
>
> Apparently this doesn't
Hello
Could anyone tell me what package this file belongs to?
$ dlocate /etc/init.d/portmap
$ dpkg -S /etc/init.d/portmap
dpkg: /etc/init.d/portmap not found.
Apparently this doesn't belong anywhere. How did it get onto the system
then?
Cheers
Sven
--
"{sum += $2} END {print sum}&
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 06:39:56PM +1030, David Purton wrote:
> just wondering whether I need the portmap daemon running or not.
>
> from what I can gather it has something to do with nfs, which I don't
> need.
You got it. The portmapper is used by things like NFS and NIS.
Hi,
just wondering whether I need the portmap daemon running or not.
I confess that the man page didn't really help me.
from what I can gather it has something to do with nfs, which I don't
need.
Today people in droves hur
Manegold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gary Hennigan wrote:
> > In the past there have been a few security incidents with things
> > associated with portmap. I definately don't run it on my 24/7 system
> > that's connected to the internet. If you do use it
; > > > bleah. how do i keep this program from starting on boot?
> > > >
> > > > i looked in /etc/init.d. can't even find a startup script for this
> > > > thing!
> > > > it's not in inetd.conf either. how does this thing get started?
>
n boot?
> > >
> > > i looked in /etc/init.d. can't even find a startup script for this thing!
> > > it's not in inetd.conf either. how does this thing get started?
> > >
> >
> > Have a look at /etc/init.d/portmap
> >
> > -
th clustered
> > computing, so you'll need to run portmap if you're using nfs, yp, or (I
> > think) trying to do a beowulf-type setup. Otherwise, you probably don't
> > need it. You could try doing a `rpcinfo -p localhost` to find out what
> > your comput
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 10:02:38 -0600 (CST), Damian Menscher said:
>
> Portmapper maps the RPC services to ports. The list of services it
> deals with are listed in /etc/rpc. Most of them deal with clustered
> computing, so you'll need to run portmap if you're using n
ion that portmapper presents some security risks
> but it almost seems like I have to have it running to get other services to
> work properly.
Portmapper maps the RPC services to ports. The list of services it
deals with are listed in /etc/rpc. Most of them deal with clustered
compu
* Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [231100 09:16]:
> bleah. how do i keep this program from starting on boot?
>
> i looked in /etc/init.d. can't even find a startup script for this thing!
> it's not in inetd.conf either. how does this thing get started?
This is more of a question to the
script for this thing!
> > it's not in inetd.conf either. how does this thing get started?
> >
>
> Have a look at /etc/init.d/portmap
>
> --
> Christoph Simon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
Is it a good idea to stop portmap from running? I did this a long time
ag
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>well, the thing is that /etc/init.d/portmap doesn't get run. symlinks to it
>from within the rc.\.d directories do. i guess i could just blow away the
>portmap script, and that might do it o
Search the list archives. I suggested a (relatively clean) method no
more than a couple of weeks ago.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 14:59, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> bleah. how do i keep this program from starting on boot?
>
> i looked in /etc/init.d. can't even find a startup script for this thing!
Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> well, the thing is that /etc/init.d/portmap doesn't get run. symlinks to it
> from within the rc.\.d directories do.
They're just symlinks to the files in /etc/init.d. The files in
/etc/init.d *are* the ones actually being run.
> i guess
well, the thing is that /etc/init.d/portmap doesn't get run. symlinks to it
from within the rc.\.d directories do. i guess i could just blow away the
portmap script, and that might do it once and for all. but it's wierd how
the thing gets run but isn't mentioned in the rc dire
started?
>
I have a portmap script in /etc/init.d
Are you sure you don't have one?
Just put
exit 0
on a line by itself near the top of the script, after the #!/bin/sh
That will keep it from starting.
--
Andrew
does this thing get started?
>
Have a look at /etc/init.d/portmap
--
Christoph Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
^X^C
q
quit
:q
^C
end
x
exit
ZZ
^D
?
help
shit
.
bleah. how do i keep this program from starting on boot?
i looked in /etc/init.d. can't even find a startup script for this thing!
it's not in inetd.conf either. how does this thing get started?
pete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Nate" == Nate Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nate> Michael Banck wrote:
>> huh, my protscan shows this:
>>
>> Interesting ports on Blackbird (127.0.0.1):
>> PortState Protocol Service
>> 9 open
Michael Banck wrote:
> Darkstar:~# nmap 62.244.87.10
>
> Starting nmap V. 2.12 by Fyodor ([EMAIL PROTECTED], www.insecure.org/nmap/)
> Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 0 seconds
>
> OK. I am relieved. A remote portscan from grc.com didn't show up anything
> eighter.
>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 02:40:46PM -0700, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > huh, my protscan shows this:
> >
> > Interesting ports on Blackbird (127.0.0.1):
[a lotta interesting ports]
> > first of all, what are these "unknown" entries about? these ports are
> > not listed in /etc/services.
>
> What i do is
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:59:00PM -0700, Nate Amsden wrote:
>
> > What ports did you scan? i usually specify -p 1-65535 when using nmap.
> > if it were my machine i would for sure firewall all those
> > services(except smtp).
>
> huh, my protscan sho
Michael Banck wrote:
> huh, my protscan shows this:
>
> Interesting ports on Blackbird (127.0.0.1):
> PortState Protocol Service
> 9 opentcpdiscard
> 13 opentcpdaytime
> 21 opentcpftp
> 23 opentcptelne
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:59:00PM -0700, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > My latest port scan (nmap running through all -s options) results show
[port scan results]
> > And I'm behind a firewall, though my machine is not firewalled itself,
> > not yet at least.
>
> What ports did you scan? i usually spec
Nate Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> > My latest port scan (nmap running through all -s options) results show
> >
> > 9 opentcp discard
> > 13 opentcp daytime
> > 25 opentcp smtp
> > 37 o
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> My latest port scan (nmap running through all -s options) results show
>
> 9 opentcp discard
> 13 opentcp daytime
> 25 opentcp smtp
> 37 opentcp time
> 111 opentcp sun
Nate Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > Aug 24 12:38:01 bilbo portmap[27641]: connect from 172.16.x.y to
> > callit(390109): request from unauthorized host
> > Aug 24 12:38:04 bilbo portmap[27641]: connect from 172.16.x.y to
>
n Version: 1:0.1.9.1-1, no
> worries, you can just laugh the scan off (if that's what it was)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 12:49:13PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> :Dear all,
> :
> :I've been seeing entries like below in my logs for a while.
> :
> : Aug 24 12:38
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Aug 24 12:38:01 bilbo portmap[27641]: connect from 172.16.x.y to
> callit(390109): request from unauthorized host
> Aug 24 12:38:04 bilbo portmap[27641]: connect from 172.16.x.y to
> callit(390109): request from unauthorized host
looks suspicious..
&
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
