On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 09:32:53AM -0600, Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
> Oh, I wasn't advocating rethinking "root" I was just pointing out that you
> cannot effectively prevent root from accessing anything you want to. (In
> fact, it can be damn tough to prevent access to certain users if you allow
>
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > The superuser can get
> > in, but root can always get in. Preventing that requires rethinking the
> > concept of "root".
> Hopefully root will stay as it is. I hate this message "Access denied" I get
> everytime I want to do something on the NT
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 11:41:00PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hopefully root will stay as it is. I hate this message "Access denied" I get
> everytime I want to do something on the NT server in university (yes, I am the
> admin...)
That and the BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) are the best thi
On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 06:02:46PM -0600, Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
> underneath or not, they can't get to underneath. The superuser can get
> in, but root can always get in. Preventing that requires rethinking the
> concept of "root".
Hopefully root will stay as it is. I hate this message "Acce
4 matches
Mail list logo