Petter Adsen wrote:
> Reco wrote:
> > May I suggest using etckeeper for this? The tool is invaluable if one
> > needs to answer a question such as "what exactly did I changed a
> > couple of days ago?". The usual caveat is that using etckeeper
> > requires at least casual knowledge of any RCS that'
On Tue, 26 May 2015 18:18:15 +0300
Reco wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
> > And even worse, after starting to mess with this, browsing is
> > _abysmal_. After taking a few speed tests online (speed.io etc),
> > upload/download and ping times seem good, but t
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:57:52PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in
> > > > > > > that process i ran iperf to get an overview of general
> > > > > > > network performance. I have two Jessie hosts connected to a
> > > > > > > dumb
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015 16:01:41 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:47:48 +0200
> > Petter Adsen wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
> > > Petter Adsen wrote:
> > > > Thanks to you, I now ge
On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:53:17 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
> Petter Adsen wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
> > > Petter Adsen wrote:
> > >
> > > > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
> > > > > Petter Adsen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'v
On Sun, 24 May 2015 16:01:41 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:47:48 +0200
> Petter Adsen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
> > Petter Adsen wrote:
> > > Thanks to you, I now get ~880Mbps, which is a lot better. It seems
> > > increasing the MTU was what had th
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:47:48 +0200
Petter Adsen wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
> Petter Adsen wrote:
> > Thanks to you, I now get ~880Mbps, which is a lot better. It seems
> > increasing the MTU was what had the most effect, so I won't bother
> > with TCP window size.
>
> Now
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
> > Petter Adsen wrote:
> >
> > > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
> > > > Petter Adsen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
> > > > > p
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:26:52 +0200
Petter Adsen wrote:
> Thanks to you, I now get ~880Mbps, which is a lot better. It seems
> increasing the MTU was what had the most effect, so I won't bother
> with TCP window size.
Now, this is a little odd:
petter@monster:/etc$ iperf -i 1 -c fenris -r
--
On Sun, 24 May 2015 13:20:04 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
> Petter Adsen wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
> > > Petter Adsen wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
> > > > process i ran iperf t
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 11:28:36 +0200
Petter Adsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
> > Petter Adsen wrote:
> >
> > > I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
> > > process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network
> > > performance. I have two Je
On Sun, 24 May 2015 12:02:32 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
> Petter Adsen wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
> > process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network
> > performance. I have two Jessie hosts conne
Hi.
On Sun, 24 May 2015 10:36:39 +0200
Petter Adsen wrote:
> I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
> process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network performance.
> I have two Jessie hosts connected to a dumb switch with Cat-5e. One
> host uses a Realtek RTL8
I've been trying to improve NFS performance at home, and in that
process i ran iperf to get an overview of general network performance.
I have two Jessie hosts connected to a dumb switch with Cat-5e. One
host uses a Realtek RTL8169 PCI controller, and the other has an Intel
82583V on the motherboar
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Damir Dezeljin wrote:
> I would apreciate any sugestion about how to set up the machine for the
> greatest performance for NFS and Samba sharing. Also which version of
For NFS, I would imagine that the kernel NFS server will provide
greater performance.
I have to set up an machine which will act like a NAS (will share files
trough Samba and NFS).
I will use Debian Linux (Woody) for this task.
I would apreciate any sugestion about how to set up the machine for the
greatest performance for NFS and Samba sharing. Also which version of
Samba, Ker
> The question is - Is Debian going to run worth a d**n on this thing? The
> primary use will be for learning C and mucking about with shell
> programming. I won't be loading much more then the base system, gcc, g++,
> and vi.
It should be fine *if* you won't do anything heavy in C. gcc
Hello all -
I'm trying to install Debian 2.0.2 on a Toshiba 386 laptop, with 4M of
memory and a 120M hard drive. I RT the fine Manual and have my stack of
floppies ready.
Used lowmem.bin, did the partition thing (92M for me, 20M for swap, 6M for
Minix),
booted with the resc1440.bin disk and ente
18 matches
Mail list logo
