Am Thu, 21 Jul 2022 02:36:59 -0400
schrieb Bijan Soleymani :
> On 64 bit machines it would have the same memory usage as i386 and
> arm32 but with the extra registers and features that the newer
> processors support.
>
> Something like that.
Thanks for the answer. But is there really a need for
On 2022-07-21 02:03, Marco wrote:
Am Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:11:08 +0300
schrieb Oskar Skog :
When the x32 port becomes official, the only reason (that I can
imagine) to use the i386 port would be for really old computers.
What is the x32 port?
I haven't heard about that yet.
Seems it is a set
Am Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:11:08 +0300
schrieb Oskar Skog :
> When the x32 port becomes official, the only reason (that I can
> imagine) to use the i386 port would be for really old computers.
What is the x32 port?
I haven't heard about that yet.
> Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4?
I'm running Debian 10 on a 400 MHz Pentium II.
512 MiB RAM and a 240 GB SSD bottlenecked by a 33 MB/s IDE interface.
So, Debian 11 hardware compatibility the same as for Debian 10?
Because I don't want to deal
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 11:26:36AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
Another thing that should not be forgotten is that the family of processors
vs the ability to make use of firmware patches to fix bugs took a hit since
family ID's of $0F and below could not be fixed with microcode. And many
of them ha
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to i686
Pentium 4 and newer.
Thanks
I think I'm running it
On 7/17/22 10:41, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Greg Wooledge [2022-07-17 08:25:24] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:35:33AM +, Marco wrote:
But why the packages are still named i386 instead of i686?
Because changing the name of the architecture would be such a massive
pain in the ass, and would
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:35:33AM +, Marco wrote:
> But why the packages are still named i386 instead of i686?
Because changing the name of the architecture would be such a massive
pain in the ass, and would probably break *so* many things, that it's
simply not worthwhile.
Le dimanche 17 juillet 2022 à 07:40:05 UTC+2, Timothy M Butterworth a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Marco wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
> schrieb Timothy M Butterworth :
>
> > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
&
thread. Some internet sites say that i686 is Pentium 4 and later
> others say that it is Pentium 2 or later. Others say that i686 is
> Pentium Pro version 2 and later. If it is indeed Pentium Pro and
> later then a lot of older processors are still supported: Pentium 2,
> Pentium 3, Penti
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Marco wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
> schrieb Timothy M Butterworth :
>
> > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
> > because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to
> &g
Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
schrieb Timothy M Butterworth :
> Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
> because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to
> i686 Pentium 4 and newer.
It would be interesting what the benefit of tha
e (not all) Celeron M) are based on the Pentium 3
because Pentium 4 created too much heat. Then the Intel Core (without
2) followed for mobile. Core (without 2) also doesn't support Intel-64
(amd64). Some newer Pentium Dual-Core also don't support i386. Core 2
supports amd64. Some Pentium 4
Timothy M Butterworth composed on 2022-07-16 11:26 (UTC-0400):
> Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
> because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to i686
> Pentium 4 and newer.
# inxi -CMS --vs
inxi 3.3.19-00 (2022-06-16)
Syste
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to i686
Pentium 4 and newer.
Thanks
I think I'm running it on an eeepc. I don't know what proc
On Sat 16 Jul 2022 at 15:17:03 (-0400), Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 2:26 PM Marco wrote:
>
> > Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
> > schrieb Timothy M Butterworth :
> >
> > > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pent
On Sat 16 Jul 2022 at 18:33:11 (+0100), Darac Marjal wrote:
> On 16/07/2022 16:26, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I
> > ask because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386
> > (1985) to i68
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 2:26 PM Marco wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
> schrieb Timothy M Butterworth :
>
> > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4?
>
> Yes, Pentium 3 600 MHz (I think it is a coppermine). Works fine.
>
Out of cur
Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:30:29 -0400
schrieb Stefan Monnier :
> Indeed, it has a Pentium mobile III-M at 1.2GHz.
>
> I'm not completely sure where that processor sits, to be honest, but
> I thought it was based on a CPU core that came before Pentium 4.
> E.g. the Pentium 4
Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
schrieb Timothy M Butterworth :
> Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4?
Yes, Pentium 3 600 MHz (I think it is a coppermine). Works fine.
On 16/07/2022 16:26, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to
i686 Pentium 4 and newer.
Debian hasn't supported 80386 processors for many years. According to
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:17 PM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4?
>
> I'm using Debian (currently stable, tho I often end up moving to
> testing) on my Thinkpad X30, yes.
>
The Thinkpad X30 has a 1.2Ghz Pentium M
Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to i686
Pentium 4 and newer.
Thanks
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀
On 06/05/2013 03:51 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Hi Paul,
paul e condon wrote:
I purchased some time ago a refurb Dell GX620. I have received
conflicting advice on this list about whether I should use amd64 or
i386 CDs to install Wheezy, but amd64 CDs seem to get further into
the install so what I wan
Hi Paul,
paul e condon wrote:
> I purchased some time ago a refurb Dell GX620. I have received
> conflicting advice on this list about whether I should use amd64 or
> i386 CDs to install Wheezy, but amd64 CDs seem to get further into
> the install so what I want help with now is all about amd64 ty
I purchased some time ago a refurb Dell GX620. I have received
conflicting advice on this list about whether I should use amd64 or i386
CDs to install Wheezy, but amd64 CDs seem to get further into the
install so what I want help with now is all about amd64 type CDs.
I set out to install using
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:31:39PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On 10/28/05, Rizlaaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Siju George wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I heard that debian sarge doesnot get installed on Intel Pentium 4
> > > "915 chipset&
On 10/28/05, Rizlaaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I heard that debian sarge doesnot get installed on Intel Pentium 4
> > "915 chipset".
> > Is that true?? I would like to buy one. Is there anyone out th
gt; Subject: Re: Does Sarge support Intel Pentium 4 "915 chipset"?
>
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I heard that debian sarge doesnot get installed on Intel Pentium 4
> > "915 chipset".
> > Is that true?? I would like to buy one.
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I heard that debian sarge doesnot get installed on Intel Pentium 4
"915 chipset".
Is that true?? I would like to buy one. Is there anyone out there
running Sarge on this chipset?? How is it??
Thankyou so much
Kind regards
Siju
I am running sarge on a 9
Hi,
I heard that debian sarge doesnot get installed on Intel Pentium 4
"915 chipset".
Is that true?? I would like to buy one. Is there anyone out there
running Sarge on this chipset?? How is it??
Thankyou so much
Kind regards
Siju
Hi All
Just wanted to find out before I purchase this Mobo if someone's already
been through the process of installing Sarge or any distro with this MB?
Any prior experience with this? And tips/hints would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Jono
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Hi All
Just wanted to find out before I purchase this Mobo if someone's already
been through the process of installing Sarge or any distro with this MB?
Any prior experience with this? And tips/hints would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Jono
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Hi All
Just wanted to find out before I purchase this Mobo if someone's already
been through the process of installing Sarge or any distro with this MB?
Any prior experience with this? And tips/hints would be appreciated. I
am also
used to installing debian with normal ATA drives, now i am gett
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 07:29, Gary Maxwell wrote:
> Happy holidays!
>
> Does anyone know whether or not the latest Debian release has support
> for the Pentium 4 SIS650 chipset? I haven't found one distribution
> yet that does.
>
> Thanks!
>
> GM
You can try
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 10:29, Gary Maxwell wrote:
> Happy holidays!
>
> Does anyone know whether or not the latest Debian release has support
> for the Pentium 4 SIS650 chipset? I haven't found one distribution yet
> that does.
>
> Thanks!
>
> GM
What do you
Happy holidays!
Does anyone know whether or not the latest Debian release has support
for the Pentium 4 SIS650 chipset? I haven't found one distribution yet
that does.
Thanks!
GM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Does anyone know how far support for the Pentium 4 has progressed in
the 2.4 series kernels?
Is CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 the best kernel-option to set, or might it still
be wiser/safer to use i386 or i686?
Thanks a lot for any advice,
Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
86 was the only reliable
> option. selecting the newest cpu variant in kernel compilation is a lot like
> using debian unstable--there will be bugginess to contend with--except that
> in the case of a buggy kernel, you really need a good reason to put your
> system at risk for the kind o
6 (i.e. to the i386 processor and its offspawn).
>
> Ok, but what option do I have to select in the menu entry "Processor type
> and features"? ("386" is probably a safe bet, but in this case I think I
> don't get any optimizations specific to a Pentium 4).
>
&
elect in the menu entry "Processor type
| and features"? ("386" is probably a safe bet, but in this case I think I
| don't get any optimizations specific to a Pentium 4).
Whatever you want, basically. i386 will work, or 1486 or i586 or
i686. I'd go for i686 if
the menu entry "Processor type
and features"? ("386" is probably a safe bet, but in this case I think I
don't get any optimizations specific to a Pentium 4).
Regards,
Holger
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:12:55PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are Pentium 4 processors supported by a 2.2.20 kernel out-of-the-box?
Yep. I guess that you ask because it mentions i386. This i386 refers to
the *architecture* i386 (i.e. to the i386 processor and its offspawn).
Hi!
Are Pentium 4 processors supported by a 2.2.20 kernel out-of-the-box? If
not, where can I get the right patches?
Thanks a lot.
Greetings,
Holger
t;Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexander Isacson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: Pentium 4
> Just to add my 2 cents...
>
> > I'm about to buy a new computer. I have been offer
Nice article to give you and idea ...
To point out what you can 'gain' by choosing for an Athlon based system have
a read http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/tbirdproject/default.asp
Just change the components with P4 material and you'll (don't forget the
RDRAM) see
Just to add my 2 cents...
> I'm about to buy a new computer. I have been offered a
> really good deal on a P4 system.
> But since the architecture is so different from previous
> pentiums I am a little hecitant.
Unless you've been offered a REALLY good deal, it's
likely worse than the cost of
aart 2001 21:34
To: Alexander Isacson
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Pentium 4
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alexander Isacson wrote:
> Will I have to recompile all major components in order to get decent
> speed with the p4?
Recompiling won't help; there's no P4-optimizing
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alexander Isacson wrote:
> Will I have to recompile all major components in order to get decent
> speed with the p4?
Recompiling won't help; there's no P4-optimizing GCC. The P4 is actually
respectable at the sort of bit shoveling that characterizes "average"
applications -
and faster on
an AMD Durn 800.
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Isacson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:46 PM
Subject: Pentium 4
> I'm about to buy a new computer. I have been offered a really good deal on
a P4
&
Go to tomshardware.com and look at his comparisons of P4s and K7s (in the CPU
guide). Tom seems to think that an athlon 1200MHz is better than a P4 1500MHz.
The P4 has a horrible FPU, so don't do any scientific calculations on it, unless
you optimize the code for SSE (which will make it pretty fast
I'm about to buy a new computer. I have been offered a really good deal on a P4
system.
But since the architecture is so different from previous pentiums I am a little
hecitant.
Will I have to recompile all major components in order to get decent speed with
the p4?
Will there be special p4-debs?
www.linux.com/hardware/newsitem.phtml?sid=26&aid=11457
Very interesting article. Shows why working together and free updates
are important to quality systems.
-D
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:39PM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
| I can't get to linux.com just now to find the article but basically
> One of our profs bought a Dell 8100 Pentium 4 for
> home use and he wants to install Linux on it. He
> would like to install Debian, but he says that Debian
> doesn't support the Pentium 4 yet. Is this true?
I think it will work just fine. The problem occurs when a progr
To quote Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# The german magazine "c't" (http://www.heise.de/ct) explitely says that
# there is no problem with Debian and the Pentium 4 on the Dell
# Dimension 8100.
# RedHat and Suse caused some problems.
That's probably because
--
From: Kay Nettle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 13:22:20 -0600
>One of our profs bought a Dell 8100 Pentium 4 for home use and he
>wants to install Linux on it. He would like to install Debian, but
>he says that Debian doesn't support the Pentium 4
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:22:20PM -0600, Kay Nettle wrote:
> One of our profs bought a Dell 8100 Pentium 4 for home use and he
> wants to install Linux on it. He would like to install Debian, but
> he says that Debian doesn't support the Pentium 4 yet. Is this true?
The g
One of our profs bought a Dell 8100 Pentium 4 for home use and he
wants to install Linux on it. He would like to install Debian, but
he says that Debian doesn't support the Pentium 4 yet. Is this true?
Kay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> >From Linuxgram Issue No 147 is this piece titled "Most Linux Cuts Won't
> Install on Pentium 4." Quoting: "In another one of those awkward little
> moments that we have come to expect from Intel, the chip giant has confirmed
>
>From Linuxgram Issue No 147 is this piece titled "Most Linux Cuts Won't
Install on Pentium 4." Quoting: "In another one of those awkward little
moments that we have come to expect from Intel, the chip giant has confirmed
that only Red Hat and TurboLinux can be installed
60 matches
Mail list logo
