On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 22:51:21 -0700
John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:15:00 -0400
> Celejar dijo:
>
> >Look into mupdf - a really lightweight PDF reader.
>
> I downloaded the tar.gz file and untarred it, but could not figure out
> how to install it. There is no .deb or .rpm file
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:32:57 +0200, Memnon Anon wrote:
> I've been using xpdf for a looong time, and I never had a problem,
> except that it can be a bit slow on my old machine.
>
> So today, I tested evince and epdfview, but some pdfs (all from the same
> source) which are perfectly fine in xpdf
On 10 October 2010 13:51, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:15:00 -0400
> Celejar dijo:
>
> >Look into mupdf - a really lightweight PDF reader.
>
> I downloaded the tar.gz file and untarred it, but could not figure out
> how to install it. There is no .deb or .rpm file in the arc
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:15:00 -0400
Celejar dijo:
>Look into mupdf - a really lightweight PDF reader.
I downloaded the tar.gz file and untarred it, but could not figure out
how to install it. There is no .deb or .rpm file in the archive.
Note: I want to install it on a computer that I use for DT
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:00:10 + (UTC)
Memnon Anon wrote:
> John Jason Jordan writes:
>
> > Of the open source PDF viewers, Okular (formerly Kpdf) is the best
> > overall . But Evince has a better export to PostScript and is more
> > lightweight. I don't mind using closed source apps as long
Ron Johnson writes:
> On 10/09/2010 09:00 PM, Memnon Anon wrote:
>> Pdf has its benefits, but I really don't understand why displaying text
>> has to freak out my notebook more than basically anything else I am
>> doing, even with xpdf :(
>>
>
> What WM/DE do you use?
I do basically everything w
On 10/09/2010 09:00 PM, Memnon Anon wrote:
John Jason Jordan writes:
Of the open source PDF viewers, Okular (formerly Kpdf) is the best
overall . But Evince has a better export to PostScript and is more
lightweight. I don't mind using closed source apps as long as they're
free, so I use Adobe
John Jason Jordan writes:
> Of the open source PDF viewers, Okular (formerly Kpdf) is the best
> overall . But Evince has a better export to PostScript and is more
> lightweight. I don't mind using closed source apps as long as they're
> free, so I use Adobe Reader a lot as well. There was a rece
Memnon Anon writes:
> Any advice is very much appreciated.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533138
Memnon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:32:57 +0200
Memnon Anon dijo:
>However, I know that lots of you people do not use xpdf, and I think
>there should be a remedy.
Of the open source PDF viewers, Okular (formerly Kpdf) is the best
overall . But Evince has a better export to PostScript and is more
lightweight.
Hi,
I've been using xpdf for a looong time, and I never had a problem,
except that it can be a bit slow on my old machine.
So today, I tested evince and epdfview, but some pdfs (all from the same
source) which are perfectly fine in xpdf are hardly legible.
,
| mem...@mymachine:~/pdf$ pdffon
11 matches
Mail list logo