-- Doug MacFarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 28 January 2003, 11:52 AM +):
> I need to apply the freeswan patch to the kernel, and, as always, I hope
> to do this "The Debian Way". I've been reading the make-kpkg man page, and
> there appears to be 3 different ways to do this.
I
Team:
I need to apply the freeswan patch to the kernel, and, as always, I hope
to do this "The Debian Way". I've been reading the make-kpkg man page, and
there appears to be 3 different ways to do this.
1. The patch_the_kernel configuration option, which I assume is somewhere
in the .config fi
First, apt-get kernel-package, and learn to use make-kpkg. (This is the
only official debian way. Read doc comes with it.)
Apply flavour patch prior to use for best result if you use old debian
source packages or kernel from kernel.org.
Kernel header is not needed for this task.
Of course, get g
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:26:40AM +0100, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I never needed to compile the kernel until now. I have to patch the
> kernel, and I would like to know what libraries, packages, programs
> I need to have on my machine (except the kernel source an headers)
> in order to
Hello,
Viktor Lakics wrote:
> I never needed to compile the kernel until now. I have to patch the
> kernel, and I would like to know what libraries, packages, programs
> I need to have on my machine (except the kernel source an headers)
> in order to do this?
Well, patching t
Hi All,
I never needed to compile the kernel until now. I have to patch the
kernel, and I would like to know what libraries, packages, programs
I need to have on my machine (except the kernel source an headers)
in order to do this?
I run potato 2.2r3 stable, and at isnstall time I mostly skipped
Nobody here answered my question about using kernel-patch .deb files, so
I'm going to answer myself. This way, anybody searching the list
archives will at least gain a little info and maybe get over this hump
more quickly than me. I have had a separate email exchange with Manoj
Srivastava, the au
I'm told (in the kernel-package/README) that:
"If you're using the patch_the_kernel facility, you may want to remove
step 2 and instead insert `--config=menuconfig' into the make-kpkg
command-line of step 4 (or perhaps use `xconfig' or `config' in place of
`menuconfi
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:16:04PM -0800, aphro wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Eric G . Miller wrote:
>
> egm2 >Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any
> egm2 >idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is
> egm2 >that breaks it.
>
> from what i
> Bernhard Rieder said:
>
> "Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> > Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any
> > idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is
> > that breaks it.
>
> Maybe this applies only to SO 5.1 (from StarDivision) and not to
> SO 5.
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Eric G . Miller wrote:
egm2 >Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any
egm2 >idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is
egm2 >that breaks it.
from what i got off the mailing list (see kt.linuxcare.com) it had to do
with th
> Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here.
What's really strange is that I've got this machine which SO 5.1a works
great on. In my laptop, however (and which I need for a presentation day
after tomorrow which I did in SO!), StarOffice errors.
Both boxes run the lat
"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any
> idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is
> that breaks it.
Maybe this applies only to SO 5.1 (from StarDivision) and not to
SO 5.1a from Sun but I'm not sure about (I have
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:12:32AM -0800, aphro wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
>
> I believe the patch i mentioned (from kt.linuxcare.com) doesn't *yet*
> exist as far as i know, SO should work with 2.2.10 although i bet
> 2.2.13 would break it (i have SO working on slink on 2.2
aphro wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
>
> homega >aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something about a patch. How do I
> apply
> homega >a patch to the kernel? I mean, just by:
>
> I believe the patch i mentioned (from kt.linuxcare.com) doesn't *yet*
> exist as far as i know,
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
homega >aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something about a patch. How do I apply
homega >a patch to the kernel? I mean, just by:
I believe the patch i mentioned (from kt.linuxcare.com) doesn't *yet*
exist as far as i know, SO should work with 2.2.10 althou
aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I installed Star Office 5.1 in the /opt directory as root with the
> setup option /net.
>
> Then I ran setup as normal user from the /opt/
> directory and the
> setup program installed basic files in my home directory.
> That's all, no problems under potato with 2.2.1
17 matches
Mail list logo
