hi ya joe
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Joe McCool wrote:
> My lilo.conf features lines with \vmlinuz and \vmlinuz.old etc.
i assume you mean: /vmlinuz
and there is no such thing in linux as \vmlinuz
as far as the kernel file itself though you can name it anything
you like
it c
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:55:52AM +0100, Joe McCool wrote:
> My lilo.conf features lines with \vmlinuz and \vmlinuz.old etc.
>
> These vmlinuz's are links to vmlinuz*2* files in my \boot directory.
I hope you mean "/" instead of "\" in all cases. :-)
> 1st confusion:
> But my /boot directory sh
I (Marty) wrote:
Joe McCool wrote:
Sorry I can't answer the first questions.
I have upgraded from woody to sarge and everything is fine, but when I
try to upgrade from 2.2.20 to 2.4.27, compiling and installing the new
kernel as per the instruction manual, I cannot boot. (40 40 40 40 or
just
Joe McCool wrote:
Sorry I can't answer the first questions.
I have upgraded from woody to sarge and everything is fine, but when I
try to upgrade from 2.2.20 to 2.4.27, compiling and installing the new
kernel as per the instruction manual, I cannot boot. (40 40 40 40 or
just Li and never a li
Thanks to all debians.
Please forgive my ignorance, but my google searches have failed to
answer my confusion;
My lilo.conf features lines with \vmlinuz and \vmlinuz.old etc.
These vmlinuz's are links to vmlinuz*2* files in my \boot directory.
1st confusion:
But my /boot directory should (?) be
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I can have three primary partitions, and then the fourth and final "slot"
> functions as a pointer to another table? (Or two and two, or four primaries,
> or 1 and 3, etc?) Is the extended partition table limited to 4 partitions as
> well, so that if I wa
On 16 Dec 1998, David S. Zelinsky wrote:
> However, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> KW> Let me preface this by saying I don't know what I'm talking about, but I
> KW> think I choose "Primary" instead of "Logical" when partitioning a drive.
> KW> I'm not real sure what each of these means
Jeff Miller's question (below) was answered by George Kapetanios: After making
the partition with cfdisk, you have to run mkfs to make an ext2 filesystem on
it. Without this, I'm surprised you were able to write anything at all to the
partition.
However, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KW>
At 08:19 AM 12/16/1998 -0500, Jeff Miller wrote:
>Hello,
>
>My drive 0 (hda) has three partitions. The first two are FAT32 Windoze and
>I have wiped, removed, and re-created the third with cfdisk. I selected
>'Logical' as the type, through cfdisk, and it was assigned a Type of 83
>(Linux). I
Shouldn't you create an ext2 filesystem on that partition with mkfs ?
george
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Jeff Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My drive 0 (hda) has three partitions. The first two are FAT32 Windoze and I
> have wiped, removed, and re-created the third with cfdisk. I selected
> 'Logical'
Hello,
My drive 0 (hda) has three partitions. The first two are FAT32 Windoze and I
have wiped, removed, and re-created the third with cfdisk. I selected
'Logical' as the type, through cfdisk, and it was assigned a Type of 83
(Linux). I can mount it and everything seems to be ok. My problem
11 matches
Mail list logo
