On Mon 02 Apr 2012 at 01:44:00 +, I wrote:
>> I tried downloading the packages manually and using "dpkg -i", but the
>> chain of dependencies was getting too scary.
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:40:51 +0100, Brian replied:
> ... 'dpkg -i cups-filters_1.0.11-1_i386.deb' ...
That succeeded easily an
On Mon 02 Apr 2012 at 01:44:00 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> "Sid" instead of "unstable" also fails. I tried downloading the packages
> manually and using "dpkg -i", but the chain of dependencies was getting too
> scary.
The dependencies for cups-filters in unstable are different from those in
te
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:18:23 +, I wrote:
>> I'm running testing (Wheezy). A couple of weeks ago a problem
>> started with printing to my parallel printer (HP LaserJet 5MP).
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 23:01:22 +0100, Brian replied:
> Read the bugs for cups-filters and decide wh
On Sun 01 Apr 2012 at 19:18:23 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> If I cancel the print job, the job is deleted from the list, but the printer
> Status is still "Processing" and process 8190 hangs around. The calling
> process (8014) is /usr/sbin/cupsd -C /etc/cups/cupsd.conf.
>
> Any ideas how to fix
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:18:23 +, I wrote:
>> I'm running testing (Wheezy). A couple of weeks ago a problem
>> started with printing to my parallel printer (HP LaserJet 5MP).
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 21:51:44 +0100, richard replied:
> there has been some problems with cups,
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:18:23 +
Steve Kleene wrote:
> I'm running testing (Wheezy). A couple of weeks ago a problem
> started with printing to my parallel printer (HP LaserJet 5MP).
>
> This test with a PostScript file succeeds:
> cat test.ps >/dev/lp0
> so the p
I'm running testing (Wheezy). A couple of weeks ago a problem started with
printing to my parallel printer (HP LaserJet 5MP).
This test with a PostScript file succeeds:
cat test.ps >/dev/lp0
so the printer itself isn't busted.
But this fails:
lpr -P HP_LaserJet_5MP -o InputSl
Debian Users
I have been plagued with an annoying problems with cups lately.
I have to unplug the usb cable every time I try to print from X
and then the console. I finally found what is causing this but
not where the problem is.
This is on Sid and on Wheezy/Testing.
Here is what I found.
On
On Saturday 10 June 2006 21:34, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 09:09:13PM -0400, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
>
>
> > Anyway I still don't get a printout. CUPS-setup via http://localhost:631
> > still does not show lp. But with KDE I can configure the printer, CUPS
> > then sees it.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 09:09:13PM -0400, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> Anyway I still don't get a printout. CUPS-setup via http://localhost:631
> still
> does not show lp. But with KDE I can configure the printer, CUPS then sees
> it. But when I submit a printjob I get the error: "Printer not conn
On Saturday 10 June 2006 19:29, Olafur Jens Sigurdsson wrote:
> Þann 2006-06-10, 18:12:58 (-0400) skrifaði Eike Lantzsch:
> > Somehow my parallel devices /dev/lp0 to /dev/lp2 have evaporated. No
> > hardware problem - I can print with that unloved "OS" from Redmond.
> > I got devices in /dev/.stati
Þann 2006-06-10, 18:12:58 (-0400) skrifaði Eike Lantzsch:
> Somehow my parallel devices /dev/lp0 to /dev/lp2 have evaporated. No hardware
> problem - I can print with that unloved "OS" from Redmond.
> I got devices in /dev/.static/dev/lp0 but I cannot "cat printtest.txt
> > /dev/.static/dev/lp0"
Hi:
Debian unstable
kernel 2.6.15 patched for ttyUSB (why is this still not in the Debian kernel
image?) but stock kernel 2.6.16-2-k7 does not make a difference
CUPS 1.2.1
Somehow my parallel devices /dev/lp0 to /dev/lp2 have evaporated. No hardware
problem - I can print with that unloved "OS"
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a parallel printer on one of our PCs, running Debian
2.2. The kernel is 2.2.17 and I've installed the parport, parport_pc, and
lp modules. The printer is a Textronix Phaser 140.
dmesg reports this:
parport0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [SPP,PS2,EPP]
lp0: usin
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:47:22PM -0500, David Shepherd wrote:
| 'modprobe lp' gives me
| modprobe: Can't locate module lp
|
| This is/was a stock debian kernel from an official CD.
|
| Anything else I can try, or do I have to recompile the kernel (I've never
| done it before).
| Can I som
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:56:30PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote:
> To quote "David Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # 'modprobe lp' gives me
> # modprobe: Can't locate module lp
> #
> # This is/was a stock debian kernel from an official CD.
> #
> # Anything else I can try, or do I have to rec
To quote "David Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# 'modprobe lp' gives me
# modprobe: Can't locate module lp
#
# This is/was a stock debian kernel from an official CD.
#
# Anything else I can try, or do I have to recompile the kernel (I've
never
# done it before).
# Can I somehow grab the sto
lease excuse my lack of kernel knowledge - I'm learning fast
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David B. Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 January 2001 2:44 p.m.
To: David Shepherd
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need help setting up pa
David Shepherd wrote:
>
> Typing 'insmod lp'
> gives me
> insmod: lp: no module by that name found
>
> typing find / -name 'lp.o'
> finds nothing
>
> How should I install this module?
It sounds like you've recompiled your kernel at some stage, since you
don't have all of the modules com
To quote "David Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Typing 'insmod lp'
'insmod' takes a real file as an argument; for instance, 'insmod
/lib/modules/2.4.0c/kernel/drivers/block/paride/paride.o'. 'modprobe',
however, doesn't need the whole file, just the name(in my example,
"paride").
# gives me
#
.
To: David Shepherd
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need help setting up parallel printer
David Shepherd wrote:
>
> I've just switched from Redhat 6.2 to Debian 2.2r2 and can't get my
> DeskJet695C working.
> Everything worked fine under RH using pr
David Shepherd wrote:
>
> I've just switched from Redhat 6.2 to Debian 2.2r2 and can't get my
> DeskJet695C working.
> Everything worked fine under RH using printtool to set it up.
[cut]
> When I try
>
> echo "this is a test" > /dev/lp0
>
> I get
>
> su: /dev/lp0: No such devi
I've just switched from Redhat 6.2 to Debian 2.2r2 and can't get my
DeskJet695C working.
Everything worked fine under RH using printtool to set it up.
/var/log/messages shows the following lines...
Jan 9 09:39:58 monster kernel: parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778)
[SPP,ECP,ECPEPP,ECPPS2]
Jan 9
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Jeffrey S. Coppock wrote:
> lprng several times, I decided to try lpr. LPR WORKS! I don't know
> what the difference is, but it's enough. I reinstalled magicfilter
Great. But i'm still wondering what whet wrong with lprng. In that
previous mail with the result of the
GREAT NEWS!!!
It's working!
I don't really understand why, but I was able to narrow it down to lpr as the
culprit (with several peoples help). So, after reinstalling lprng several
times, I decided to try lpr. LPR WORKS! I don't know what the difference is,
but it's enough. I reinstalled ma
Okay, here's where I'm at:
I checked the permissions of the log directories and files and the files are
all set to 0660.
LPR is setuid root [I used 'find / -perm -4000 -print' to check ]
I tried 'lpr -D 1 ' and got this:
bash$ lpr -D 1 dell_specs.txt
2001-01-06-17:29:32.042 [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
* Jo Geraerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010106 18:41]:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, David Reviejo wrote:
>
> > > I chmod 0666 /dev/lp0 and it worked without su.
> > Don't do this. The /dev/lp? devices are 0660 by default, with group
> > "lp"; you only need to add the user who need to use the printer
> >
Hello
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, David Reviejo wrote:
> > I chmod 0666 /dev/lp0 and it worked without su.
> Don't do this. The /dev/lp? devices are 0660 by default, with group
> "lp"; you only need to add the user who need to use the printer
> to the "lp" group (this work too for another devices: group
* Jeffrey S. Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010106 15:32]:
> Jo, et al;
>
> I tried the echo redirect below and was told 'permission denied', so I
> tried it as root and it worked, the printer printed the message.
>
> I chmod 0666 /dev/lp0 and it worked without su.
Don't do this. The /dev/lp? devi
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jeffrey S. Coppock wrote:
> I tried the echo redirect below and was told 'permission denied', so I
> tried it as root and it worked, the printer printed the message.
> I chmod 0666 /dev/lp0 and it worked without su.
So it isn't the kernel config that's wrong.
> The l
Jo, et al;
I tried the echo redirect below and was told 'permission denied', so I tried it
as root and it worked, the printer printed the message.
I chmod 0666 /dev/lp0 and it worked without su.
I tried tried lpr -Plp and it wouldn't work with or without su.
On the magicfilter config, are you
Hello,
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Jeffrey S. Coppock wrote:
> Jan 4 07:36:20 localhost kernel: parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7,
> dma 3 [SPP,ECP,ECPPS2]
> Jan 4 07:36:21 localhost kernel: parport_probe: succeeded
> Jan 4 07:36:21 localhost kernel: parport0: Printer, HEWLETT-PACKARD DESKJE
k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/04/01 08:03 AM
To: debian laptop list , debian user list
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Parallel Printer Port Problem
Well, it's still doesn't work. I've added an options line in the /etc/modul
Well, it's still doesn't work. I've added an options line in the
/etc/modules.conf file specifying io=0x378 dma=3 irq=7. With lp reloaded, I
see in the /proc/parport/0 that these options are set and that my printer is
being seen. The syslog shows the following:
Jan 4 07:36:20 localhost kern
Anyone,
I recently got the newest Dell Latitude CPx laptop and I've installed it with
stable 2.2.18. I've got about everything worked out but the sound and the
parallel printer port. I need help with the parport. It won't work. Here's
everything I can think of to
A reboot brought my printer to life. I must admit I tried the standard
Microsoft remedy more than once in trying to fix this problem. I'm not
sure why it worked this time.
My thanks to Nils and others who responded to my post.
Curt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 10:17:35AM +0100, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 08:59:49PM -0600, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> > The problem is _no_ device on any port is found, so no device works--not
> > /dev/lp0, lp1, lp2, or lp3. So adjusting the printcap won't help.
> Is lp a module or c
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 08:59:49PM -0600, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> The problem is _no_ device on any port is found, so no device works--not
> /dev/lp0, lp1, lp2, or lp3. So adjusting the printcap won't help.
Is lp a module or compiled in? What do the startup message say then?
Nils
--
*
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 05:42:22PM -0800, David Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 1999 16:37:15 CST, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> > After upgrading to the 2.2.1 kernel on a Slink system my old NEC P6 printer
> > is no longer found at boot or in /proc/devices. The boot messages reads
> >
> > lp: driver load
After upgrading to the 2.2.1 kernel on a Slink system my old NEC P6 printer
is no longer found at boot or in /proc/devices. The boot messages reads
lp: driver loaded but no devices found
I'm using modules (parport and parport_pc) for printer support, which I
also used successfully under a 2.
40 matches
Mail list logo
