I think the module complications really came about from using "bf.24"
instead of the default ("linux"). I simply chose 'lp' and the parallel port
modules kind of fell into place
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:42:10AM +0100, g00se wrote:
> >>
> If you are installing a stock debian kernel, modprobe lp
> should load the appropriate modules.
> >>
>
> That sounds promising, but are you suggesting that i issue that command? And
> if so, are you saying i don't then need to explicitl
>>
If you are installing a stock debian kernel, modprobe lp
should load the appropriate modules.
>>
That sounds promising, but are you suggesting that i issue that command? And
if so, are you saying i don't then need to explicitly select parallel port
support in the install and that it'll be selec
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 09:35:28PM +0100, g00se wrote:
> >>
> Are you installing Debian or a Debian kernel or are you rolling your
> own? What are you doing?
> >>
>
> I'm installing
>
No, you don't have to have a parallel device plugged into the port for
it to be recognized, it should be found as
>>
Are you installing Debian or a Debian kernel or are you rolling your
own? What are you doing?
>>
I'm installing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g00se wrote:
At install, if support for a parallel port is required, is it better if
the device that is going to be attached to it is plugged into that port
at install time, or does it make no difference?
Is it necessary to configure module support explicitly for this?
Are you installing Debian
At install, if support for a parallel port is
required, is it better if the device that is going to be attached to it is
plugged into that port at install time, or does it make no
difference?
Is it necessary to configure module support
explicitly for this?
7 matches
Mail list logo