Re: Packaging WM themes - question

2001-05-27 Thread Casper Gielen
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:02:33PM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > Casper Gielen wrote: > than a Gigahertz Athlon. No way! However, sacrifing functionality or > user choice (I believe, the thread started about the choices a user has > when installing themes) is not the way to go. > What I'm tr

Re: Packaging WM themes - question

2001-05-27 Thread Bruce Sass
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: <...> > It might not be fast, but this is a 386 we're talking about. It simply > isn't fast by todays standards [1]. But for some purposes it's good > enough. "today's" could be, your's, the people you know, the region you live in, the economy you are

Re: Packaging WM themes - question

2001-05-27 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Casper Gielen wrote: > > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:45:10PM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > > > Come on! I don't mean to be ignorant, but a 286 is 18 years old. The > > 386 is only 3 years younger. No one is "depending" on hardware this old > > -- not even in schools. At least not in Europe

Re: Packaging WM themes - question

2001-05-27 Thread Casper Gielen
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:45:10PM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > Come on! I don't mean to be ignorant, but a 286 is 18 years old. The > 386 is only 3 years younger. No one is "depending" on hardware this old > -- not even in schools. At least not in Europe or North America. > You'd be sh

Re: Packaging WM themes - question

2001-05-27 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:18:31PM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > Ben Burton wrote: > > > > > > > ... so you get a bigger machine for the job. > > > > > > I suspect the point of Casper's post was that this is not always possible. > > > > I really have a hard time believing that. > > > >