idden
Ahah! Finally a different error - 403 forbidden instead of 404 not found!
$ ll -l /var/www/public/debian/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64
total 16M
6.8M -rw--- 2 me me 6.8M 2014-08-18 12:00 Packages.bz2
4.0K drwxr-xr-x 2 me me 4.0K 2014-08-18 14:44 Packages.diff
8.8M -rw--- 2 me
On a wheezy install (basically default from what I can tell), why
would apt-get update try to load Packages file from server when the
server serves Packages.gz and Packages.bz2?
The repo is a http served mirror created with debmirror.
I think I came across this once a few years ago, but for the
On 2014-04-08 20:49 +0200, Hans wrote:
>> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither
>> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on
>> ftp.de.debian.org.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>Sven
> Hi Sven.
>
> This was exactly the server I was looking at. I
Le 08/04/2014 20:55, Erwan David a écrit :
> Le 08/04/2014 20:49, Hans a écrit :
>>> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither
>>> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on
>>> ftp.de.debian.org.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>Sven
>> Hi Sven.
>>
>>
Le 08/04/2014 20:49, Hans a écrit :
>> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither
>> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on
>> ftp.de.debian.org.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>Sven
> Hi Sven.
>
> This was exactly the server I was looking at. I just
> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither
> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on
> ftp.de.debian.org.
>
> Cheers,
>Sven
Hi Sven.
This was exactly the server I was looking at. I just wondered, because someone
told at heise.de f
On 2014-04-08 20:25 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Maybe I am wrong, but it looks like the fixed openssl 101-g is in the repo,
> but
> not in the packages.gz of debian/jessie.
>
> So (if I see this correct), debian/jessie will not see and update the newest
> version.
It should ha
Hello,
Maybe I am wrong, but it looks like the fixed openssl 101-g is in the repo, but
not in the packages.gz of debian/jessie.
So (if I see this correct), debian/jessie will not see and update the newest
version.
But maybe I am wrong and the error is here on my system, who knows.
Kind
Franco Martelli wrote:
> In debian-6.0.0-amd64-DVD-8.iso image the file Packages.gz exist but
> in debian-6.0.7-amd64-DVD-8.iso it doesn't!
> This cause an "apt-get update" error. I don't know which package
> affect this bug...
Probably there weren't any pac
Hi,
In debian-6.0.0-amd64-DVD-8.iso image the file Packages.gz exist but in
debian-6.0.7-amd64-DVD-8.iso it doesn't!
This cause an "apt-get update" error. I don't know which package affect
this bug...
root@mitas:~# mount -o ro,loop
/media/sdb1/sqeeze/debian-6.0.0-amd64-D
I note you say you have not had any other comment. I get the same
error. I still get the standard red gear wheel on the application bar,
updates are downloaded and installed without problem and the programme
reports my system is up to date but I still get an orange triangle with
an exclamation
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Mark Goldshtein wrote:
>> Does the 'http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib i386
>> Packages/DiffIndex' and 'http://http.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib
>> i386 Packages/DiffIndex' are contain the same packages for update?
>
> When I read your mes
Mark Goldshtein wrote:
> Does the 'http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib i386
> Packages/DiffIndex' and 'http://http.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib
> i386 Packages/DiffIndex' are contain the same packages for update?
When I read your message I was going to comment upon some of your
/etc/apt/sour
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Mark Goldshtein wrote:
>> Is that temporary problem or there is need to change something in
>> source.list? Before this, all updates went smooth.
>
> Those kinds of errors tend to be temporary. The http.us.debian.org
> and ftp.us.debian.org nam
Mark Goldshtein wrote:
> Is that temporary problem or there is need to change something in
> source.list? Before this, all updates went smooth.
Those kinds of errors tend to be temporary. The http.us.debian.org
and ftp.us.debian.org names are mapped to multiple addresses so that
you will round-ro
Hello, list!
Today's log of apt-get update:
[...]
Err http://http.us.debian.org squeeze/updates/contrib i386 Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 35.9.37.225 80]
W: Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/updates/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
404 Not Found [IP: 35.9.37.2
Hallo Jens,
Am 2008-05-05 15:29:27, schrieb Jens Seidel:
> You can use the jigdo files such as debian-40r2-i386-DVD-1.jigdo from
> http://www.debian.co.il/debian-cd/4.0_r2/i386/jigdo-dvd/ or
> http://ftp.pwr.wroc.pl/debian-iso/4.0_r1/i386/jigdo-dvd/debian-40r1-i386-DVD-1.jigdo
> to extract this in
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:20:32PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> As I have written, I have nearly 20 TByte of Debian packages on my
> mirror and only accidently killet the /debian/dists/ directory with all
> its Packages.gz, Sources.gz, Release and releases.gpg files.
>
> Did anyone mention http://archive.debian.org/README yet?
Yes, but the lists are not complete.
> If you get the Packages.gz, Release and Release.gpg files from a
> CD/DVD set then you can verify them individually with the debian
> archive key from that time and then merge them into a
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:00:58PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> For potato I doubt you have much hope except for the last point release
> (which is availible on archive.debian.org).
I have one CD (CD1?) of potato (IIRC 2.2r2) that came with my Debian
GNU/Linux Bible. If that is of any help, I c
due to how mirroring works, but is it *granted* that
>> there are no differences among mirrors?
>>
>> Would such difference inhibit proper installation due to the apt-secure
>> stuff?
They have to be identical accross all mirrors.
Release.gpg safeguards Release
Re
t included in the releases...
And yes, there is a problem with the signed release files, but since I
can check my packages agains packages on I am sure,
I have the right an unaltered ones.
And IF I recreate the packages.gz/Sources.gz, I sign it with MY key and
you CAN trust it or not...
And of
I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
"Release" from the directories
Afaict snapshot.debian.net has woody down to r4 and all point releas
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:07:51PM +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> You are asking generically Packages without specifying a mirror. Are
> they granted to be identically replicated among all mirrors? Of course
> they *probably* are due to how mirroring works, but is it *granted* that
> there are
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
> files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
> "Release" fro
Hello Lennart,
Am 2008-04-04 12:44:38, schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
> Certainly archive.debian.org would have the last version of each release
> (so 2.2r5, 3.0r6, etc).
Thank you for this hint...
> The CDs would have had seperate (and different) Packages.gz since there
> would be on
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:52:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Neat project. I am not sure why being able to install 3.0r3 rather than
> > 3.0r6 is necesarily very useful, but it is neat to have the choice.
>
> To have repr
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
> files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
> "Re
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Neat project. I am not sure why being able to install 3.0r3 rather than
> 3.0r6 is necesarily very useful, but it is neat to have the choice.
To have reproducibility of installations, where such is necessary (e.g.,
software escro
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
> files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
> "Release" from th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michelle Konzack wrote on 2008-04-03 15:35:
> Hello,
>
> I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
> files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sou
Hello,
I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
"Release" from the directories
/debian/dists/${RELEASE}/main/binary-${ARCH}/
/debia
Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> how make own deb reprositary on CD with own packages (for using in
> sources.list) - how right make Packages.gz file ?
>
> - ---
> best regards Evgeniy
>
Check out my howto on creating a Debian repository:
http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hi all,
how make own deb reprositary on CD with own packages (for using in
sources.list) - how right make Packages.gz file ?
- - ---
best regards Evgeniy
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:31:33PM -0500, Mr Mike wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 04:29 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:53:25PM -0500, Mr Mike wrote:
> > 'apt-get update' updates the Packages.gz for source and binary depending
> > on you
e.
>
> > Can I still use dpkg-scansources and add them (ie: the Packages.gz) to
> > my sources list? OR... would I have to uninstall then reinstall via the
> > newly created source?
> >
> > mr mike
> > houston, tx
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> dpkg-scansources
stalled already with dpkg -i .deb and their info is already
> in the apt database. ie: they show up in synaptic and apt-cache show
> whatever
So you have done an apt-get update.
> Can I still use dpkg-scansources and add them (ie: the Packages.gz) to
> my sources list? OR... would I
about this one.
I have a directory full of *.deb files that may OR maynot have been
installed already with dpkg -i .deb and their info is already
in the apt database. ie: they show up in synaptic and apt-cache show
whatever
Can I still use dpkg-scansources and add them (ie: the Packages.g
On Tuesday 21 Jun 2005 14:51, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> I added the "debs file:///home debs/" line to my sources.list file.
>
> However, I am getting this error when I start Synaptic, which has me
> puzzled:
>
> "W: Couldn't stat source packages list file: debs/ Packages
> (/var/apt/lists/__home_
Couldn't stat source packages list file: debs/ Packages
(/var/apt/lists/__home_debs_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or
directory)"
Is APT not recogninzing the Packages.gz file that I create with
dpkg-scanpackages?
I have verified that the Packages.gz file is in the directory, and
even
Is it possible to do that? All I found was a flame full tread that the only
sugestion it contained didn't work:
Default
{
Packages::Compress ". bzip2"
}
still downloads the 3MB Packages.gz instead of the 2MB Packages.bz2
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:57:11PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 01:56:30PM -0800, John Christian said
> >
> > So ... I can't seem to pass the corrupt (MD5?) tests on both the ISO
> > images and http mirrors.
>
> Your ISO has a incorrect md5sum? That means the image is corrup
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 01:56:30PM -0800, John Christian said
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to install 'woody' on a i386 machine, booting and otherwise
> prepping from the "compact-3.0.23-netinst.iso" image. Now, I've tried
> the standard woody install as well with the same problem, leading me to
>
Hello,
I'm trying to install 'woody' on a i386 machine, booting and otherwise
prepping from the "compact-3.0.23-netinst.iso" image. Now, I've tried
the standard woody install as well with the same problem, leading me to
believe it's not something with my network config.
So ... I can't seem to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 December 2003 4:22 pm, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Dan> Because of the broken Last-Modified, I am unable to get fresh
> Dan> copies of
> Dan>
> http://marillat.free.fr/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
>
Dan> Because of the broken Last-Modified, I am unable to get fresh
Dan> copies of
Dan> http://marillat.free.fr/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
Dan> from my ISP's cache!:
Cristian> Please read my home page.
http://marillat.free.fr:
Since yesterday all packages u
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:58:57PM +1000, Rene Cunningham wrote:
> Gday,
>
> Is there a Debian tool that will help me regenerate Packages.gz from a
> pool of packages? I can use dpkg-scanpackages in a script but since i
> have woody and sid packages in the same pool direct
Frank Chung wrote:
> (2) do something with the URL to bypass this error for the time
> being?
Hmm... Not what you want exactly but perhaps this will help in some
way. Have you looked at apt-zip? All you need is to get the Packages
files to your machine so that you are past the 'apt-get update'
Hi all,
My company uses Symantec Web Security to screen for viruses at the HTTP
proxy machine (and there's no way to bypass the proxy). SWS returns with
this message when I try to open any Packages.gz (whether it's in
stable/testing/unstable, or main/contrib):
-- --
Access Denied
The
>>>>> "Frank" == Frank Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all, My company uses Symantec Web Security to screen for
> viruses at the HTTP proxy machine (and there's no way to
> bypass the proxy). SWS returns with this mes
o your job) because it encroaches on his job. Perhaps some
company politicing is in order. I mean, your supervisor approves of your
install right? If so, see if he will help you show his supervisor how
good it is, etc. If he doesn't approve, you'd better start there.
The uncompressed ve
Frank Chung wrote:
Hi all,
My company uses Symantec Web Security to screen for viruses at the HTTP
proxy machine (and there's no way to bypass the proxy). SWS returns with
this message when I try to open any Packages.gz (whether it's in
stable/testing/unstable, or main/contrib):
--
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 23:58, Rene Cunningham wrote:
> Gday,
>
> Is there a Debian tool that will help me regenerate Packages.gz from a
> pool of packages? I can use dpkg-scanpackages in a script but since i
> have woody and sid packages in the same pool directory, the latest
>
Gday,
Is there a Debian tool that will help me regenerate Packages.gz from a
pool of packages? I can use dpkg-scanpackages in a script but since i
have woody and sid packages in the same pool directory, the latest
version is written to Packages.gz
Script goes something like
PKGDIR=`find pool
Hi all,
I am trying to install Woody via NFS .
I the content of all CDs into on directory and exported it as an NFS-share.
As I read on the internet I did an
dpkg-scanpackages pool/main /dev/null |gzip >
dists/woody/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
for pool/main,pool/non-US/main etc... from
Try KDE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-14 23:36:09 -0400]:
> Lets say I have two lines in sources.list that are almost identical
> expect for the http sites are different. And now I issue a "apt-get
> update", and site1 tells apt "the latest version of testing/vim is 1.3",
> while site2, which ma
Lets say I have two lines in sources.list that are almost identical
expect for the http sites are different. And now I issue a "apt-get
update", and site1 tells apt "the latest version of testing/vim is 1.3",
while site2, which may not be up to date, tells apt "the latest version
of testing/v
Karsten Heymann wrote:
> Is there any possibility or plan to stop
> this double download?
just a thougt: link files in /var/lib/apt/lists together, like "ln -s
$PRIMARY_Package $SECONDARY_Package". When updating, apt or dselect
should download only newest file (by timestamp), which might be $PR
ke sense ?? If it
> > > gets the list from your close mirror and doesn't check
> > > the official site, you may always be a package-revision
> > > behind...
> > >
> >
> > Wouldn't a checksum be enough?
>
> Doesn't a checksum just tell you
> * Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [010810 16:43]:
> > > for up-to-date and for bandwith reasons i have
> > > multiple debian mirrors in my sources.list, a close
> > > one (which i hope is faster) and the official master
> > > (which i believe is updated first):
> >
> >
> >
> > > Now if i do
* Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010810 16:43]:
> > for up-to-date and for bandwith reasons i have
> > multiple debian mirrors in my sources.list, a close
> > one (which i hope is faster) and the official master
> > (which i believe is updated first):
>
>
>
> > Now if i do 'dselect update'
> for up-to-date and for bandwith reasons i have
> multiple debian mirrors in my sources.list, a close
> one (which i hope is faster) and the official master
> (which i believe is updated first):
> Now if i do 'dselect update' or 'apt-get update' most
> of the time i see two 'Packages' files bei
Hi List,
for up-to-date and for bandwith reasons i have multiple debian mirrors
in my sources.list, a close one (which i hope is faster) and the
official master (which i believe is updated first):
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
...
deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub
n mounted) and dselect wants to know some
CE> packages.gz-file, but I haven' t any.
CE>
CE> So I have some questions:
CE>
CE> Do I have to use dpkg -i
Pretty much, yeah. (Or you could use dpkg-scanpackages to build your
own Packages file, but this is less practical if you
ect" with the option multi-cd
for to install some deb-packages of my distribution.
Christian> Now I like to install a downloaded deb.package or one from
another cd.
Christian> I tried (with option mounted) and dselect wants to know some
packages.gz-file, but I haven' t an
m another cd.
I tried (with option mounted) and dselect wants to
know some packages.gz-file, but I haven' t any.
So I have some questions:
Do I have to use dpkg
-i and
is dselect only dedicated for the installation
of the deb-pakages delivered with the
distibutions cds?
?
> I searched for 2.0 files and found the following.
hmm why debian 2.0? Why not debian 2.2?
2.0 goes ok..but there is SO much more stuff in 2.2!
Joe
>
> ftp.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/Debian-2.0
>
>
> Dselect, however, says it cannot find Packages.gz
> w
.
ftp.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/Debian-2.0
Dselect, however, says it cannot find Packages.gz
when I instruct it to access the site and directories
below (or anything other than the current version's
packages.gz).
What can I do?
Thanks.
Tony Laszlo
Tokyo
w packages get upgraded. But earlier today, I
>> started my usual upgrade process, and pulled down the latest
>> Packages.gz file for potato/main, and (I use dselect) noticed that
>> many (thirty or more?) of my installed packages were now marked for
>> removal. I was afraid
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 10:43:56PM -0800, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> I've been upgrading my potato installation about every day for months,
> and usually only a few packages get upgraded. But earlier today, I
> started my usual upgrade process, and pulled down the latest
> Packages.g
I've been upgrading my potato installation about every day for months,
and usually only a few packages get upgraded. But earlier today, I
started my usual upgrade process, and pulled down the latest
Packages.gz file for potato/main, and (I use dselect) noticed that
many (thirty or more?)
On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 09:50:54AM -0500, Jonathan D . Proulx wrote:
> How do I generate a Packages.gz file for a local distribution directory?
dpkg-scanpackages which is from the dpkg-dev package.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Coll
How do I generate a Packages.gz file for a local distribution directory?
TIA,
Jon
from all .deb files that I have downloaded, so that I can use dselect
instead of using "dpkg -i <*.deb>"?
CH
On 15-May-99 Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 06:37:30PM -, Pollywog wrote:
>> Now that I upgraded to Potato, with apt-get, I am unable to use dselect to
>> update packages. It wants Package.gz files but I am uncertain how
>> to proceed. Can anyone suggest where I might find step
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 06:37:30PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> Now that I upgraded to Potato, with apt-get, I am unable to use dselect to
> update packages. It wants Package.gz files but I am uncertain how
> to proceed. Can anyone suggest where I might find step-by-step information on
> this? Will
Now that I upgraded to Potato, with apt-get, I am unable to use dselect to
update packages. It wants Package.gz files but I am uncertain how
to proceed. Can anyone suggest where I might find step-by-step information on
this? Will I have to wait until a Potato CD is released or should I forget
ab
- Forwarded message from Pekka Siitoin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> From: "Pekka Siitoin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Vs: Easy way to make a packages.gz file?
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 17:28:26 +0200
> X-Priority: 3
> X-M
> Assuming I have a directory with many .deb files, is there an easy way to
> generate a packages.gz file for this directory?
I'm not sure about this, though I believe .deb files are actually files
which are already archived and compressed (sort of .tgz's with a debian
installati
Becher, Andrew:
> Assuming I have a directory with many .deb files, is there an easy way to
> generate a packages.gz file for this directory?
If you just want dselect to install from that directory, you don't actually
need a packages.gz file - when dselect asks you where the Packa
On 10-Feb-99 Becher, Andrew wrote:
> Assuming I have a directory with many .deb files, is there an easy way to
> generate a packages.gz file for this directory?
>
dpkg-scanpackages -- read its man page.
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Becher, Andrew wrote:
> Assuming I have a directory with many .deb files, is there an easy way to
> generate a packages.gz file for this directory?
>
man dpkg-scanpackages
Assuming I have a directory with many .deb files, is there an easy way to
generate a packages.gz file for this directory?
on-US/dists/slink/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz:
not a plain file.
Well, I'd hate to disagree with apt ;-), but the Packages.gz file is a
regular file and the filesize and permissions match exactly with what's on the
ftp site. This happens on main, non-free, and contrib. To m
s/stable/non-free/binary-i386...
> Checking dists/stable/contrib/binary-i386...
> Closing ftp connection...
>
> Now when I Update...:
>
> Getting Packages files...(stop with ^C)
>
> Connecting to ftp.us.debian.org...
> Login as anonymous...
> Setting transfer mode to binary...
iles...(stop with ^C)
Connecting to ftp.us.debian.org...
Login as anonymous...
Setting transfer mode to binary...
Cd to `/debian'...
Checking for Packages file... Couldn't find Packages.gz in
dists/stable/main/binary-i386 or dists/stable/main; ignoring.
Checking for Packages file... Coul
I'm trying to use dselect with the ftp method for accessing debian packages. I
use a correct site and dist names (the Access step complete successfully), but
the Update step fails to retrieve the Packages.gz files. It complains that it
can't find Packages or Packages.gz in any of th
Oliver Thuns wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> I start dselect, select FTP in access (using my lokal
> Windows-FTP-Server) and then try to make an update. I get the following
> error message:
>
> Couldn't find Packages.gz in dists/stable...
>
> I don't know wh
On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Oliver Thuns wrote:
> I start dselect, select FTP in access (using my lokal
> Windows-FTP-Server) and then try to make an update. I get the following
> error message:
>
> Couldn't find Packages.gz in dists/stable...
>
Someone can probably answer th
> Hallo,
> I start dselect, select FTP in access (using my lokal
> Windows-FTP-Server) and then try to make an update. I get the following
> error message:
> Couldn't find Packages.gz in dists/stable...
> I don't know what's wrong... HELP!!! ;-)
I don'
Hallo,
I start dselect, select FTP in access (using my lokal
Windows-FTP-Server) and then try to make an update. I get the following
error message:
Couldn't find Packages.gz in dists/stable...
I don't know what's wrong... HELP!!! ;-)
On Sun, 20 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote:
>
> I am trying to create my own local directory of debian packages. Can
> someone tell me what the command is to generate the Package.gz and
> Contents.gz files?
>
For the packages file you need dpkg-scanpackages. To use this, you will
need the override
I am trying to create my own local directory of debian packages. Can
someone tell me what the command is to generate the Package.gz and
Contents.gz files?
Thanks
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello !
Something that is remarked frequently the last days is, that the
bo (and hamm, btw) Packages.gz on ftp.debian and at master, are out
of date (they have the time stamp Apr 7.) There are a lot of
packages, that can't be accessed via ftp through dselect.
Is anybody out there respon
I just checked the packages.gz in contrib and buzz on
sun10.sep.bnl.gov (in contrib packages.gz is newer than the most recent
package there!) and on some other most uptodate-mirrors. Both packages.gz
don't reflect, what's in the directories for real.
But I noticed at least in contrib,
95 matches
Mail list logo
