Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-29 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 05:45:59PM +0100, Bart Warmerdam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 02:55:19AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote: > > MoiN > > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > > I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions > > > I k

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-29 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 30 Dec, Bart Warmerdam wrote about "Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive" > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 02:55:19AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote: >> MoiN >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >> > I wen

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-29 Thread Bart Warmerdam
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 02:55:19AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote: > MoiN > > On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions > > I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib, > > non-us/no

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-29 Thread Ingo Saitz
MoiN On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions > I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib, > non-us/non-free), and went and checked wether all the dependencies > can be satis

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-28 Thread Peter Makholm
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bugs need to be filed, though they need proper investigation. > > But do you think they are release critical bugs? If the packages can't be installed because of missing depencies it's and release critical bug. If the depencies just are ugly

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-28 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
Martin Schulze wrote: > > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions > > I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib, > > non-us/non-free), and went and checked wether all the dependencies > > can be satisfied. As it tu

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-28 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "Martin" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> fvwmconf => fvwm2 (yes! fvwm2 doesn't exist) Martin> Where is fvwm2 gone to? It is named fvwm now, as this is now the official fvwm version (prior to that fvwm 1.24 was the official version, and fvwm2 was a beta). fvwm 1.24 is fvwm1 no

Re: Packages referenced but missing from the archive

1999-12-28 Thread Martin Schulze
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions > I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib, > non-us/non-free), and went and checked wether all the dependencies > can be satisfied. As it turns out, there are many packages r