On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Giancarlo Pegoraro
wrote:
>> I'm trying today an upgrade to my testing install after quite a while.
>> What I get is:
>>
>> gnome-network-admin: Depends: gnome-system-tools (= 2.22.1-5) but 2.28.1-1
>> is to be installed.
>> Conflicts: ne
Hi,
Il giorno lun, 16/11/2009 alle 10.42 +0100, Matteo Riva ha scritto:
> I'm trying today an upgrade to my testing install after quite a while.
> What I get is:
>
> gnome-network-admin: Depends: gnome-system-tools (= 2.22.1-5) but
> 2.28.1-1 is to be installed.
>Conflic
I'm trying today an upgrade to my testing install after quite a while.
What I get is:
gnome-network-admin: Depends: gnome-system-tools (= 2.22.1-5) but
2.28.1-1 is to be installed.
Conflicts: network-manager-gnome but 0.7.1-1 is
to be installed.
gnome-system-tools: Confl
As far as I know, Aptitude records its log in /var/log
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:52 +0200, pol wrote:
> i would like to log installation and uninstallation of the deb packages: i
> mean a time ordered list of the admin operations.
> Any ideas?
>
> thank you
>
> --
> Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:52 +0200, pol wrote:
> i would like to log installation and uninstallation of the deb packages: i
> mean a time ordered list of the admin operations. Any ideas?
Have a look at:
If you use aptitude:
/var/log/aptitude
As apt-get does not provid
i would like to log installation and uninstallation of the deb packages: i
mean a time ordered list of the admin operations.
Any ideas?
thank you
--
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want as small and stripped down a system as possible, and I am quite
happy with the versions of commands provided by busybox. It replaces
a whole bunch of commands from a variety of packages, but I can not
find a list of those packages. Presumably also some of those are
part of the base system
The render code in xfree86 that is in xfree86 4.2.1 has a bug which will
cause xft2 enabled apps (like mozilla and gnome 2.2) to crash if strings
are too long. See:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186704
Though mozilla triggers this quite frequently, any xft2 enabled app is
affected
Hi Again Stan,
Sorry your having so much trouble. I'm not certain how to cure the
dselect
wanting to uninstall 208 packages. Maybe dpkg --clear-avail command?
May I suggest using a script I made to save your currently installed
package
state/list to a floppy. Then if you
* Stan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-14 17:29 +0200:
> On Sat Apr 14 02:18:40 2001 Oliver Elphick wrote...
> >You got the packages built for unstable; if you look more closely in that
> >URL you will also find packages for potato.
> So I dselect _all_ postgress related packages (hey I ca
On Sat Apr 14 02:18:40 2001 Oliver Elphick wrote...
>
>"Stan Brown" wrote:
> >I just really messed up!
> >
> >I have a "stable" machine, and i had installed all the PostgreSQL related pa
> >ckages
> >from the stable archive, and all was well.
> >
> >Then I downloaded all the PostgreSQL 7
"Stan Brown" wrote:
>I just really messed up!
>
>I have a "stable" machine, and i had installed all the PostgreSQL related pa
>ckages
>from the stable archive, and all was well.
>
>Then I downloaded all the PostgreSQL 7.1 RC1 packages from
>http://people.debian.org/~elphick/post
Hi Stan,
Get the postgresql package that you had installed before, and then...
dpkg --force-downgrade postgresql-
If neccessary
dpkg --force-downgrade --force-overwrite postgresql-
E-mail back if that doesn't work of course.
Hope that helps you,
Jimmy Richards
On Friday 13 April 2001 2
I just really messed up!
I have a "stable" machine, and i had installed all the PostgreSQL related
packages
from the stable archive, and all was well.
Then I downloaded all the PostgreSQL 7.1 RC1 packages from
http://people.debian.org/~elphick/postgresql/, put them in a directory all to
themselv
On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 11:40:22AM -0600, Craig T. Hancock wrote:
> Hello list does anyone use any unstable packages with the stable the
> reason I am asking is I do know that unstable means that they haven't
> been tested yet so I was thinking if trying some new versions of stuff
> but
That's a
Unfortunately there is no simple answer; some will and others will not. I
would recommend staying away from the potato versions of libc6 and ldso,
for example. This situation changes almost daily. I'm running potato and
it has never broken enough to justify a reinstall, but not everything
works.
Craig T. Hancock writes:
> Hello list does anyone use any unstable packages with the stable the
> reason I am asking is I do know that unstable means that they haven't
> been tested yet...
Unstable really just means that the unstable distribution is changing
rapidly as developers upload stuff. In
Hello list does anyone use any unstable packages with the stable the
reason I am asking is I do know that unstable means that they haven't
been tested yet so I was thinking if trying some new versions of stuff
but
I wanted to ask before I try. I guess I\what I am trying to say is will
a unstable pa
18 matches
Mail list logo
