Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread dman
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:57:15AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: | > ... I can verify, though, that using a machine as an | > ethernet LAN => PPP WAN gateway works quite | > well... | | I don't doubt that it does, but this machine probably *always* | uses ppp, right ?? That's not my case. I defined

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread Hall Stevenson
> ... I can verify, though, that using a machine as an > ethernet LAN => PPP WAN gateway works quite > well... I don't doubt that it does, but this machine probably *always* uses ppp, right ?? That's not my case. I defined an actual gateway, which I wouldn't do with a normal ppp config. Hall

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread dman
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:10:03AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: | > I don't know if this is your problem, but I recently | > helped a friend troubleshoot his mandrake laptop, | > and found that to get ppp to work we had to bring | > down eth0 for some reason. It seems like you | > shouldn't have t

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread Hall Stevenson
> Do you have a gateway defined in /etc/network/interfaces? Sure do. It points to my Linksys router/switch, 192.168.1.1. With dial-up, that device is no longer valid. > If so, # (comment) it out as long as you are using ppp. > PPP will set its own default gateway. I have a similar > problem when

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread Hall Stevenson
> I don't know if this is your problem, but I recently > helped a friend troubleshoot his mandrake laptop, > and found that to get ppp to work we had to bring > down eth0 for some reason. It seems like you > shouldn't have to, but you could try that, if you still > have your eth0 up. I'll certain

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread John Hasler
> Running 'pppconfig' worked fine and I'm able to connect. Tail'ing > /var/log/messages shows everything good, up to assigning an IP address > (and depending on how I have DNS set, receiving DNS entries). Problem is, > I can't do anything...This includes pinging a website by IP address. That > rul

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread David Raeker-Jordan
Hall Stevenson wrote: > > For as long as I've been using Debian, I've had DSL and never > the need to use dial-up... Last Thursday though, my DSL modem > died and I tried connecting with dial-up. > > Running 'pppconfig' worked fine and I'm able to connect. > Tail'ing /var/log/messages shows every

Re: PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread David Roundy
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:34:17AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: > > For as long as I've been using Debian, I've had DSL and never > the need to use dial-up... Last Thursday though, my DSL modem > died and I tried connecting with dial-up. > > Running 'pppconfig' worked fine and I'm able to connect

PPP question (my DSL is down !!)

2001-10-08 Thread Hall Stevenson
For as long as I've been using Debian, I've had DSL and never the need to use dial-up... Last Thursday though, my DSL modem died and I tried connecting with dial-up. Running 'pppconfig' worked fine and I'm able to connect. Tail'ing /var/log/messages shows everything good, up to assigning an IP ad

Re: ppp question [*]

2001-04-01 Thread Mathias
> is ppp 2.3.11 work with linux kernel 2.3.11 ? Could be possible! I needed an upgrade to ppp 2.4.0 to use it with kernel-2-4.0.

ppp question [*]

2001-04-01 Thread maths
hello everybody: is ppp 2.3.11 work with linux kernel 2.3.11 ? thank you. maths [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PPP question.

1998-12-06 Thread Kent West
On Sun, 6 Dec 1998, Shao Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > In my /var/log/ppp.log, I have a line saying that: > > Dec 6 19:17:50 virge pppd[558]: Serial connection established. > Dec 6 19:17:51 virge pppd[558]: speed 112150 not supported > Dec 6 19:17:51 virge pppd[558]: Using i

Re: PPP question.

1998-12-06 Thread Ruud de Bruin
On Sun, 6 Dec 1998, Shao Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > In my /var/log/ppp.log, I have a line saying that: > > Dec 6 19:17:50 virge pppd[558]: Serial connection established. > Dec 6 19:17:51 virge pppd[558]: speed 112150 not supported > Dec 6 19:17:51 virge pppd[558]: Using i

PPP question.

1998-12-06 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi all, In my /var/log/ppp.log, I have a line saying that: Dec 6 19:17:50 virge pppd[558]: Serial connection established. Dec 6 19:17:51 virge pppd[558]: speed 112150 not supported Dec 6 19:17:51 virge pppd[558]: Using interface ppp0 What did I do wrong

(non-debian) PPP question.

1997-09-28 Thread Udjat the BitMeister...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I have two different modems that I make PPP connections with. Is there a way to force them to us the same network interface every time? serial-ppp1 uses ppp0 ISDN-ppp2 uses ppp1 every time? I use mrtg to track traffic and the interfaces flip around. Thanks!

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-20 Thread Dave Cinege
On Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:36:01 -0500, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: >Kevin Traas wrote: >> >> >Hmmm. What's the netmask on the ethernet interface? If it's set to >> >255.255.255.224 then everything should work fine even though >> >> Yes, it is. > >Then NT's routing algorithm is wrong or there are othe

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-19 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Kevin Traas wrote: > > >Hmmm. What's the netmask on the ethernet interface? If it's set to > >255.255.255.224 then everything should work fine even though > > Yes, it is. Then NT's routing algorithm is wrong or there are other routes afoot. Run netstat -r on the NT box to verify that the routes

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-18 Thread Kevin Traas
>Hmmm. What's the netmask on the ethernet interface? If it's set to >255.255.255.224 then everything should work fine even though Yes, it is. >the NT box sets 255.255.255.0 on the PPP link. This is because the >routing algorithm chooses the route with the most matching bits (that >is, the one wi

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-17 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Kevin Traas wrote: > > Thanks for the reply (and the info), Jens. > > Here's what I'm trying to do: > > I've got one assigned Class C - 206.182.236.0 - which I've split using a > netmask of 255.255.255.224. > > I'm using one subnet of 206.182.236.32 for my local LAN. My Debian Linux > box is

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-17 Thread Kevin Traas
--- > Linux is not user-friendly. It _is_ user-friendly. It's just not ignorant-friendly or idiot-friendly. -Original Message- From: Jens B. Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kevin Traas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wednesday, Se

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-17 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Kevin Traas wrote: > > I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system. (Debian > 1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0) > > I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming lines and tried setting > the subnet mask in /etc/ppp/options to "netmask 255.255.255.224"; however, > my incoming clie

Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-17 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Kevin Traas wrote: > > I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system. (Debian > 1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0) > > I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming lines and tried setting > the subnet mask in /etc/ppp/options to "netmask 255.255.255.224"; however, > my incoming clie

Incoming PPP question - subnetting

1997-09-17 Thread Kevin Traas
I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system. (Debian 1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0) I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming lines and tried setting the subnet mask in /etc/ppp/options to "netmask 255.255.255.224"; however, my incoming clients have netmasks of 255.255.255.0

Re: PPP question.

1997-07-29 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Udjat -A MiB wrote: > > I have a BitsurfrPro EZ modem (ISDN). I can do single channel connections > just fine. How ever when I do multi-link PPP (duel channel) I have a LCP > EchoReq problems: > > Jul 28 09:46:18 bitgate pppd[28432]: local IP address 206.163.127.171 > Jul 28 09:46:18 bitgate ppp

Re: PPP question.

1997-07-29 Thread Al Youngwerth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: PPP question. > Date: Monday, July 28, 1997 6:45 AM > > > I have a BitsurfrPro EZ modem (ISDN). I can do single channel connections > just fine. How ever when I do multi-link PPP (duel channel) I have a LCP >

PPP question.

1997-07-29 Thread Udjat -A MiB
I have a BitsurfrPro EZ modem (ISDN). I can do single channel connections just fine. How ever when I do multi-link PPP (duel channel) I have a LCP EchoReq problems: Jul 28 09:46:18 bitgate pppd[28432]: local IP address 206.163.127.171 Jul 28 09:46:18 bitgate pppd[28432]: remote IP address 206.16

Re: Yet another PPP question

1997-05-25 Thread Martin . Bialasinski
On 25 May, Douglas Bates wrote: > I have been using Debian 1.3 with a 2.1.35 kernel at home. I usually > connect to my ISP using xisp but I also have pppd configured. > > Recently I upgraded to libc6. I'm not sure that I got all the needed > pieces in place. One side-effect of the upgrade is t

RE: Yet another PPP question

1997-05-25 Thread W.D.McKinney
On 25-May-97 Douglas Bates wrote: >I have been using Debian 1.3 with a 2.1.35 kernel at home. I usually >connect to my ISP using xisp but I also have pppd configured. > >Recently I upgraded to libc6. I'm not sure that I got all the needed >pieces in place. One side-effect of the upgrade is that

Yet another PPP question

1997-05-25 Thread Douglas Bates
I have been using Debian 1.3 with a 2.1.35 kernel at home. I usually connect to my ISP using xisp but I also have pppd configured. Recently I upgraded to libc6. I'm not sure that I got all the needed pieces in place. One side-effect of the upgrade is that both pppd and xisp now fail immediately

Another PPP Question :(

1996-11-18 Thread Kevin Cabral
The biggest problem since I've installed Debian 4 months ago, for me, has been the configuration of dial-up networking. I've installed all the appropriate packages, configured the kernel, and gone through the HOWTOs related to PPP and networking to setup such files as /etc/networks /etc/res