Re: potato bug in xlib6g 3.3.6-6 for Alpha

Wow! Now that is service! Thank you very much!!! >Oh, also I've put it at http://www.debian.org/~dhd/ for the time being >(until the mirorrs are resynced). > >Cheers > >-- >David Huggins-Daines, Senior GNU/Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. >613.562.1239 desk, 613.223.0225 mobile >[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: potato bug in xlib6g 3.3.6-6 for Alpha

"James D. Freels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks this makes sense. However, I had already tried reinstalling > ldso before I reported the bug. I see now that the latest version on > the servers I normally use (http.us.debian.org, ftp.us.debian.org) > show the current version is ldso_1.9.11

Re: potato bug in xlib6g 3.3.6-6 for Alpha

"James D. Freels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks this makes sense. However, I had already tried reinstalling > ldso before I reported the bug. I see now that the latest version on > the servers I normally use (http.us.debian.org, ftp.us.debian.org) > show the current version is ldso_1.9.11

Re: potato bug in xlib6g 3.3.6-6 for Alpha

David, Thanks this makes sense. However, I had already tried reinstalling ldso before I reported the bug. I see now that the latest version on the servers I normally use (http.us.debian.org, ftp.us.debian.org) show the current version is ldso_1.9.11-8.deb. Where can I get the -8.deb file? >Dat

Re: potato bug in xlib6g 3.3.6-6 for Alpha

"James D. Freels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have posted a bug report unique to the current Alpha version of the > xlib6g package in potato: Not a bug in xlib6g. A bug in ldso (/etc/ld.so.cache was busted, so the dynamic linker couldn't find libraries outside the system search path ... /usr

potato bug in xlib6g 3.3.6-6 for Alpha

I have posted a bug report unique to the current Alpha version of the xlib6g package in potato: _ Package: xlib6g Version: 3.3.6-6 current update of Debian 2.2 potato prerelease As far as I can tell, this bug is unique to Alpha systems. This bug does not happen o

Re: POTATO BUG!!!

Reporting bugs is important. Your help is appreciated very much! Please look at and a package named "bug". This package is not mentioned in the document, strangely enough. On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 09:09, Robert L. Harris wrote: > Ok, > Didn't know about

Re: POTATO BUG!!!

Ok, Didn't know about this. Figured it was rather important before release... That's why I mailed, now I know. Thanks. Thus spake Remco van 't Veer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The "Debian bug tracking system" is an > interesting system to browse after or before you

Re: POTATO BUG!!!

The "Debian bug tracking system" is an interesting system to browse after or before you upgrade to unstable. The bug you detected has already been noted, its details can be viewed at: . Remco On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 22:1

POTATO BUG!!!

I just upgraded two of my boxes to potatoe. In /etc/rcS.d/S35devpts.sh apparantely owned by libc6 there is an error. Line 16 has a { which should be a closing } instead. Robert :wq! --- Robert L. Harris

Re: debiandoc-sgml: slink-to-potato bug?

Martin Fluch wrote: > There are some debian packages for that: bug and reportbug Please don't report another bug about that. Instead, read any of these bugs: #47363, #50286, #50540, #52052, #46270, #50286, #50540, or #52052 -- see shy jo

Re: debiandoc-sgml: slink-to-potato bug?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Svante Signell wrote: > Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs > yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next > time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce, > debian-news, deb

Re: dpkg-dev: slink-to-potato bug?

> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Note: the potato version is unstable, and you are more likely to encounter problems with it rather then slink. However, if you are willing to submit bug reports, I am sure that most developers will be grateful. Svante> Hello, Since

dpkg-dev: slink-to-potato bug?

Hello, Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce, debian-news, debian-change, debian-user. Upgrading from slink emacs or xemacs resulted in an u

debiandoc-sgml: slink-to-potato bug?

Hello, Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce, debian-news, debian-change, debian-user. Output when installing debiandoc-sgml: Cannot find te

Umm... slink and potato bug?

The version of lsof that I see in the slink and potato dists is only usable on kernels up to 2.0.35. Yet slink is a 2.0.36 kernel, and potato is a 2.2.x kernel... which means the lsof included with the distro is unusable. Is this a distro bug or am I just missing something?