apt-get dist-upgrade did that for me... it is the latest version.
Parrish
--- ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:51:24PM -0700, Parrish M Myers wrote:
> > Can anyone help?
> >
> > I have a 3Com US Robotics 56K Voice Fax Internal modem... It
> worked
> > great with isapn
I admit this solution is annoying and is not the way to go...but
temprarily you could use the old isa-pnp tools. Just do
pnpdump -c | isapnp
Did you possibly forget to compile in serial port stuff? Just a shot in
the dark...
Greg
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Parrish M Myers wrote:
> Can anyone help?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:51:24PM -0700, Parrish M Myers wrote:
> Can anyone help?
>
> I have a 3Com US Robotics 56K Voice Fax Internal modem... It worked
> great with isapnp and the 2.2.18 kernel. As soon as I upgraded my
> system to unstable and the 2.4.5 kernel, it won't work anymore. The
>
Can anyone help?
I have a 3Com US Robotics 56K Voice Fax Internal modem... It worked
great with isapnp and the 2.2.18 kernel. As soon as I upgraded my
system to unstable and the 2.4.5 kernel, it won't work anymore. The
isa-pnp.o kernel module detects the modem but upon 'cat /proc/isapnp'
it tel
hi
I've just installed the base portion of potato and can't seem to
get a response from my SupraExpress 288i PnP modem. Does anyone
know if this is a winmodem?
definitely no - that's standard modem. i have supraexpress 336i pnp
running very stable with slink
PS. I
> I have a 56k SupraExpress that IS one of those stupid WinModems... Doesn't
> even work in Winblows sometimes.
> >To the best of my knowledge, it is NOT.
> >I strongly suggest you disable PNP. Then it should be pretty easy to get the
> >thingy running...
and I have 56K Supra also, I didn't even t
It could be just a pnp. most likely it is.
Try to get it with isapnp.
Just get the port where modem is installed in Windows, and see if you can
get the response out of modem by using isapnp
Andrew
Never include a comment that wi
can't seem to
>>get a response from my SupraExpress 288i PnP modem. Does anyone
>>know if this is a winmodem?
>
>To the best of my knowledge, it is NOT.
>
>I strongly suggest you disable PNP. Then it should be pretty easy to get the
>thingy running...
>
>
>-
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:34:28 -0600, Kent West wrote:
>I've just installed the base portion of potato and can't seem to
>get a response from my SupraExpress 288i PnP modem. Does anyone
>know if this is a winmodem?
To the best of my knowledge, it is NOT.
I strongly suggest yo
I've just installed the base portion of potato and can't seem to
get a response from my SupraExpress 288i PnP modem. Does anyone
know if this is a winmodem?
PS. I tried searching the web (including the linux hardware
compatibility and the www.debian.org search engine, hoping it'd
Evan Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Are you logged in as root? pon/poff do require that, i seem to remember.
>
> --Evan
>
With the correct file permissions, pon/poff *can* be run by a normal,
non-root, user.
--
Ed C.
It seems that I am to be the doomsayer of Diamond modems. Folks, if you
plan on using Linux, don't buy one! You weren't very specific about your
modem. Some of the older Diamond Supra modems are actually accessible to
Linux, but it's not easy to set them up. The newer PCI modems are
memory-mapp
Are you logged in as root? pon/poff do require that, i seem to remember.
--Evan
I am a new Linux User. I need Help!
I am having Problems Setting up My Supra 56k PNP PCI modem with Debian. I
can install the Base System from Floppy Fine. When I Tryed to connect to my
ISP it told me that /usr/bin/pon: /usr/sbin/pppd: Permission denied. So I
read the install manual and it told me
gt; > > which is non-standard for a serial port (I'm using two other ports
> > > > > already). Does
> > > > > pnpdump find the device?
> > > > >
> > > > > Robert Henry Rati wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Has any
> > > > an internal USR
> > > > Sportster this time was a breeze and it was actually better since I
> > > > could use IRQ 5
> > > > which is non-standard for a serial port (I'm using two other ports
> > > > already). Does
> &g
this time was a breeze and it was actually better since I could
> > > use IRQ 5
> > > which is non-standard for a serial port (I'm using two other ports
> > > already). Does
> > > pnpdump find the device?
> > >
> > > Robert Henry Rati wr
Q 5
> > which is non-standard for a serial port (I'm using two other ports
> > already). Does
> > pnpdump find the device?
> >
> > Robert Henry Rati wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone configured a PNP modem in Linux using PNPISATOOLS? I have a
>
7;m using two other ports already).
> Does
> pnpdump find the device?
>
> Robert Henry Rati wrote:
>
> > Has anyone configured a PNP modem in Linux using PNPISATOOLS? I have a
> > 33.6 modem which (unfortunately) is PNP and haven't been able to get Linux
> > t
bert Henry Rati wrote:
> Has anyone configured a PNP modem in Linux using PNPISATOOLS? I have a
> 33.6 modem which (unfortunately) is PNP and haven't been able to get Linux
> to recognize it. It should see it on /dev/ttyS1, since it's set for Com
> 1. Also, there were a number
Has anyone configured a PNP modem in Linux using PNPISATOOLS? I have a
33.6 modem which (unfortunately) is PNP and haven't been able to get Linux
to recognize it. It should see it on /dev/ttyS1, since it's set for Com
1. Also, there were a number of scripts setup to connect you to a
On Sat, Jan 17, 1998 at 09:40:12PM -0500, Gerald Wann wrote:
> I am installing Linux on a PnP BIOS machine that currently has
> a modem jumpered for PnP installation. Does Debian Linux
> require any special modules to use such a setup? Is it even
> possible?
>
> (the PnP BIOS installs the modem as
Hi all-
I am installing Linux on a PnP BIOS machine that currently has
a modem jumpered for PnP installation. Does Debian Linux
require any special modules to use such a setup? Is it even
possible?
(the PnP BIOS installs the modem as COM2, which is left
disabled in the CMOS)
Thanks in advance -
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
: On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 08:43:17PM -0600, Charles Read wrote:
: >
: > BTW, how do you talk to a modem from DOS?
: > I want to try what Nathan suggested and see
: > if the modem is a 'WinModem'. How else
: > could you tell if not from DOS?
:
: Another
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Charles Read wrote:
: > You mentioned that it doesn't appear in
: > /proc/interrupts; what about /proc/ioports?
:
: Yes, the serial device appears in /proc/ioports
: as:
:
: ...
: 0x3f8: serial (set)
: ...
:
: BTW, how do you talk to a modem from DOS?
: I want to try what N
Charles Read wrote:
>
> > Another test-- can you use the modem with one of Windows'
> > "Standard 28800 modem" type drivers, or do you have
> > to use on specifically for your modem?
>
> A tech-support person at Cybermax Computer, which
> built my system, just told me that all of their 56K modems
> Another test-- can you use the modem with one of Windows'
> "Standard 28800 modem" type drivers, or do you have
> to use on specifically for your modem?
A tech-support person at Cybermax Computer, which
built my system, just told me that all of their 56K modems
are "Windows-based". We walked th
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 09:57:05PM -0600, Charles Read wrote:
> > Another test-- can you use the modem with one of Windows'
> > "Standard 28800 modem" type drivers, or do you have
> > to use on specifically for your modem?
>
> A tech-support person with the company that built
> my system just told
> Another test-- can you use the modem with one of Windows'
> "Standard 28800 modem" type drivers, or do you have
> to use on specifically for your modem?
A tech-support person with the company that built
my system just told me that all 56K modems they
deal with are 'Windows-based'. We walked thr
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 08:43:17PM -0600, Charles Read wrote:
> > You mentioned that it doesn't appear in
> > /proc/interrupts; what about /proc/ioports?
>
> Yes, the serial device appears in /proc/ioports
> as:
>
> ...
> 0x3f8: serial (set)
> ...
Hmmm. That's a good sign. Perhaps there IS an I
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 08:43:17PM -0600, Charles Read wrote:
>
> BTW, how do you talk to a modem from DOS?
> I want to try what Nathan suggested and see
> if the modem is a 'WinModem'. How else
> could you tell if not from DOS?
Another test-- can you use the modem with one of Windows'
"Standard
> You mentioned that it doesn't appear in
> /proc/interrupts; what about /proc/ioports?
Yes, the serial device appears in /proc/ioports
as:
...
0x3f8: serial (set)
...
BTW, how do you talk to a modem from DOS?
I want to try what Nathan suggested and see
if the modem is a 'WinModem'. How else
c
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 04:03:29PM -0600, Charles Read wrote:
> [BTW, what is a 'Legacy device', and why would
> you need it for a PnP modem?]
A legacy device is a non-PnP device. You need to tell your BIOS
about them because it can't detect what IRQs/DMA channels th
7;, and why would
: you need it for a PnP modem?]
:
: 5. FYI, the modem is a ViVa 56K speaker/phone
: with a Lucent 1643 chipset. It works fine for
: Win95.
:
: QUESTIONS:
[snip]
Here's my question:
Is this merely a PnP modem, or one of those dreaded WinModems?? If so,
devices. Also, in the
PnP/PCI submenu in the BIOS, I also toggled
to 'Legacy device' for the relevant IRQ and 2 of
the DMAs I thought were getting used.
[BTW, what is a 'Legacy device', and why would
you need it for a PnP modem?]
5. FYI, the modem is a ViVa
On Sun, Nov 30, 1997 at 09:29:00PM -0600, Charles Read wrote:
> In the BIOS, I turn the 'PnP OS' option off.
> In the 'PCI peripherals' section of the BIOS,
> I disable the two 'Onboard serial devices'
> (as these two 9-pin ports are currently unused).
>
> When I look into Win95, I look at the set
olution?
-c
Original Message Follows
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "linux.debian.user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cu connects to PnP modem ok, but no response for AT
Date: 27 Nov 97 12:34:32 GMT
On Wed, Nov 26, 1997 at 02:31:48PM +0500, Igor Grobman wro
On Wed, Nov 26, 1997 at 02:31:48PM +0500, Igor Grobman wrote:
> > # cu --speed 115200 --line /dev/ttyS1
> > Connected
> > [here I type "at&f", which is not echoed]
> > cu: write: I/O error
> > Disconnected
> > #
>
> Looks like your modem is not really detected by linux. The "connected"
> messag
> Earlier, I reported that:
>
> # cu --speed 115200 ---line /dev/ttyS1
> cu: open (/dev/ttyS1): Permission denied
> cu: /dev/ttyS1: Line in use
>
> To fix this, I did:
>
> # vigr
> [added my user name to the 'dialout' group]
> # newgrp dialout
>
> Then:
>
> # cu --speed 115200 --line /dev/t
Charles Read wrote:
> Earlier, I reported that:
>
> # cu --speed 115200 ---line /dev/ttyS1
> cu: open (/dev/ttyS1): Permission denied
> cu: /dev/ttyS1: Line in use
>
> To fix this, I did:
>
> # vigr
> [added my user name to the 'dialout' group]
> # newgrp dialout
>
> Then:
>
> # cu --speed 11
Earlier, I reported that:
# cu --speed 115200 ---line /dev/ttyS1
cu: open (/dev/ttyS1): Permission denied
cu: /dev/ttyS1: Line in use
To fix this, I did:
# vigr
[added my user name to the 'dialout' group]
# newgrp dialout
Then:
# cu --speed 115200 --line /dev/ttyS1
Connected
[here I type "a
at is
the problem exactly when you try to use the modem? If
the port doesn't seem to exist to Linux you might need to
uncomment some parts of /etc/rc.boot/0setserial which
from memory only enables the first two ports by default.
I had a PnP modem working here while testing it, using
isapnpto
IOS or by isapnptools, then it should work. What is
the problem exactly when you try to use the modem? If
the port doesn't seem to exist to Linux you might need to
uncomment some parts of /etc/rc.boot/0setserial which
from memory only enables the first two ports by default.
I had a PnP modem w
I run Win95 and Linux 2.0.29 off separate hard drives
running off an AMD K6 platform. Win95 uses a
Plug-and-Play modem from Computer Peripherals, Inc.
(a ViVa 56LC-SM). Linux, however, cannot dial out
on this device; in fact, cu/kermit cannot even connect
to the device.
I have verified with sets
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jason Goldschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hi, does anyone have any experience getting a US Robotics Sportster
>28.8-33.6 PnP modem to work with linux? Or any PnP modem for that matter.
>I've done all the common setup stuff for
> Hi, does anyone have any experience getting a US Robotics Sportster
> 28.8-33.6 PnP modem to work with linux? Or any PnP modem for that matter.
> I've done all the common setup stuff for the modem. I found that if I
want
> to use the modem under NT, I have to disable PnP in my
Jason Goldschmidt wrote:
>Hi, does anyone have any experience getting a US Robotics Sportster
>28.8-33.6 PnP modem to work with linux? Or any PnP modem for that matter.
>I've done all the common setup stuff for the modem. I found that if I want
>to use the modem under NT, I have
Hi,
I do have a US Robotics Sportster 28.8 FAX modem (which _was_
advertized as PnP), and have had no problems getting it to work -- my
ppp-connect-with-diald script is attached below. (It did use to work
without AT&F1M0Y0E1V1Q0&C1&D2S0=0S7=30S13=1 as well).
manoj
#! /bin/sh
#
Hi, does anyone have any experience getting a US Robotics Sportster
28.8-33.6 PnP modem to work with linux? Or any PnP modem for that matter.
I've done all the common setup stuff for the modem. I found that if I want
to use the modem under NT, I have to disable PnP in my bios. But if I do
49 matches
Mail list logo
