Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > This is why the gpg maintainers get so sniffy about mutt. The mime/pgp > attachments are not widely supported *at all*. So there's been an > option, since 1.2.3 I think, to do it the standard way. Put > > set pgp_create_traditi

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-10 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > Say I'm using one of the many mailers that doesn't support gpg > > integration, so I need to save the message and key to disk and use gpg > > manually to check the signatures. What parts of the message are > >

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
msg.pgp Description: PGP message pgpgrX4is1BOD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-10 Thread kmself
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 12:57:44PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > > If it helps, my .muttrc is attached. Note that I've got gpg, not > > pgp, installed. I'd recommend you use the same. There is only one > > tag in my mu

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-09 Thread Carel Fellinger
Brian and others, thanks for the replys, I guess I can't solve all without reading:) On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 07:09:34PM -0700, brian moore wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 03:21:58AM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote: > > now I get the following error message once I open a signed mail: > > > >[--

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-09 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > If it helps, my .muttrc is attached. Note that I've got gpg, not pgp, > installed. I'd recommend you use the same. There is only one tag in my > muttrc which appears relevant, that's the "pgp_autosign" hook. >

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-08 Thread kmself
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 03:21:58AM +0200, Carel Fellinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hai, > > I admit upfront, I haven't read all the docs, but I would be chilled > if someone could point me to the relevant part of the docs, or maybe > even spoils the fun of having to read it all and explains:)

Re: PGP and Mutt

2000-09-08 Thread brian moore
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 03:21:58AM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote: > Hai, > > I admit upfront, I haven't read all the docs, but I would be chilled > if someone could point me to the relevant part of the docs, or maybe > even spoils the fun of having to read it all and explains:) > > I've upgraded f

PGP and Mutt

2000-09-08 Thread Carel Fellinger
Hai, I admit upfront, I haven't read all the docs, but I would be chilled if someone could point me to the relevant part of the docs, or maybe even spoils the fun of having to read it all and explains:) I've upgraded from hamm to potato, and decided to try pgp due to all the debian-user mails tha