Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/07 18:03, Paul Johnson wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >>> On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] > Therein lies the rub of any ISP. ISPs suck a

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 00:37:37 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: >On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 04:01 +, s. keeling wrote: >> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> > Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that >> > are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread Paul Johnson
Greg Folkert wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: >> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that >> >> are

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread s. keeling
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > >> are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding > >> terribly, horrifically sl

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread Max Hyre
Greg Folkert wrote: > I have Comcastic! Meh... crappy. I only get 1100KB/sec from kernel.org > and giganews.com. Is that a typo? 1100KBps = 1.1MBps = 8.8Mbps For 9Mbps I'll put up with almost anything---after all, a T1 is only 1.544 Mbps. On AT&T [A]DSL, I generally get 130KBps = 1.04Mbp

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > >> are typically used (MITs and the

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that >> are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding >> terribly, horrifically sl

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-30 Thread Dan H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: >> Who's your provider? > > Formerly pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com > > Now subkeys.pgp.net. > > I now am getting no delays since the change. I don't understand the > difference from (pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com) to subkeys.pgp.n

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-29 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 04:01 +, s. keeling wrote: > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > > are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding > > terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-29 Thread s. keeling
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding > terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is > becoming more and more frequent. Nope:

PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

2007-01-29 Thread Greg Folkert
Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Even many web-interfaces timeout regularly. I'd like to