RE: PCI Wireless NIC question.

2003-08-21 Thread Percival, Ray
Yup I just got back from the store with a brand new MA311. :) So from your post I assume that yours works well. :) -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Bouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 12:56 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: PCI Wireless NI

Re: PCI Wireless NIC question.

2003-08-21 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
On a recent trip to Frys, armed with a print-out of the "supported cards" from the linux-wlan project, I found the only PCI based wifi card still with a supported chipset was the Netgear MA311 which still uses the prism2 chipset... I later confirmed this by contacting Netgear and pointedly

RE: PCI Wireless NIC question.

2003-08-21 Thread Percival, Ray
: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PCI Wireless NIC question. On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:03:50 -0700, "Percival, Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I recently decided to go wireless at home. I bought a Dlin

Re: PCI Wireless NIC question.

2003-08-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:03:50 -0700, "Percival, Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I recently decided to go wireless at home. I bought a Dlink dwl-520 ..'DWL-520' or 'DWL-520+' ??? That damned "+" makes one _hell_ of a difference, it uses an ACX-100 chip, details

PCI Wireless NIC question.

2003-08-21 Thread Percival, Ray
I recently decided to go wireless at home. I bought a Dlink dwl-520 thinking it was a prisim2 chipset. Well it turned out that when I got it it is not a prisim2 but rather a realtek. No problem they seem to have drivers. http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloads1-3.aspx?software=True&compamod