nd am frustrated at the PCI modem situation.
Yes I can use a external... No problem... for me it is the idea of the
PCI internal (were I live we truly can't do DSL or cable and the phone
is just past two wire telegraph in capabilities) My Western Electric
202- E1 and 634a subset telephone seem to wo
On 4. September 2005 at 2:01PM -0700,
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Ewart wrote:
[...]
> > Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for
> > requiring an internal PCI modem?
> >
> > Dave.
> >
> >
> All I want it for is
Nuke wrote:
My understanding is that a modem that has a controller will work from Linux,
with no additional driver, by being associated with an RS232 serial port.
This is obviously the COM1 or COM2 if external. If internal, the Linux
compatible modem will also have a UART chip so it becomes
Hans du Plooy wrote :
>External USB modems are often no more than the usual winmodem in a shell.
That's interesting, I did not know that.
My understanding is that a modem that has a controller will work from Linux,
with no additional driver, by being associated with an RS232 serial port.
Th
Nuke wrote:
Hans du Plooy said :-
If* you manage to track them [internal modems] down, the ones that still
exsist cost aboutas much as an external serial modem, so why not just get
one of those?
This reaction is fairly typical when internal modems are mentioned in the
Linux world, a
I use a Multitech MT5634ZPX-PCI. It is not a WinModem - it is quality kit
with an on board controller, which is what an internal modem needs for
Linux.
Hans du Plooy said :-
>If* you manage to track them [internal modems] down, the ones that still
>exsist cost aboutas much as an external seri
just get one of
those?
And perform much better, probably too.
Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for requiring
an internal PCI modem?
Dave.
All I want it for is callerid on a sarge based myth system.
The reason I wanted a PCI modem was because I just got done
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:30 am, Mike wrote:
> Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
> kernel 2.6.8?
Sufficiently ground, most internal modems will make some pretty horrible
coffee, but still better than they do a modem. Just get a plain old external
serial
Mike wrote:
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8?
I agree with Bob. I'd get a USR 5610B modem if you must have a PCI
modem. They're fairly pricey but it's worth the money.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Sunday 04 September 2005 06:30 am, Mike wrote:
> Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
> kernel 2.6.8? Like does newegg sell any modems that will just work
> without a huge hassle of tracking down a driver or some add-on crappy
> binary from some company who doesn
y not just get one of
> those?
And perform much better, probably too.
Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for requiring
an internal PCI modem?
Dave.
--
Please don't CC me on list messages!
...
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All email from me
> Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
> kernel 2.6.8?
*If* you manage to track them down, the ones that still exsist cost about
as much as an external serial modem, so why not just get one of those?
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8? Like does newegg sell any modems that will just work
without a huge hassle of tracking down a driver or some add-on crappy
binary from some company who doesn't want to open the source to their
obsolete analog mo
hello,
i am having difficulties installing an pci modem with setserial and the
2.6 kernel.
it seems that the name(s) of the serial modules have changed from 2.2.x,
2.4.x to the 2.6.x series. what used to be "serial" is now "8250" and
"8250-pci", etc.
the (relev
Hi folks--
I'm trying to add a modem to a Dell Precision 410 running debian
testing on top of Linux 2.2.6
One think I can't figure out is its device--/dev/ttyS??.
"lspci -vv" reports:
:00:10.0 Serial controller: 5610 56K FaxModem 56K FaxModem Model
5610 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [16550])
--- Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at
22:38, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > --- Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun,
> 2003-06-01 at
> > 15:11, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > > > Hi folks:
> [snip]
> > > Are you telling XFree which PCI device to use?
> > >
> > > $ ls
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 15:11, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> I've just installed Woody on a brand-new box and am having problems
> getting X and the modem working. I suspect these problems are
> connected, and that the AGP card and modem are not being recognized.
>
> General information:
> C
Hi folks:
I've just installed Woody on a brand-new box and am having problems
getting X and the modem working. I suspect these problems are
connected, and that the AGP card and modem are not being recognized.
General information:
CPU: Athlon XP 2400+
MoBo: ECS K7VTA3/KT300 v.5
Graphics card: ATI
S Yuval wrote:
I've purchased a new US Robotics Performance Pro modem that is
guaranteed to run on Linux. According to the manual it should be
automatically detected by any kernel newer than 2.3.x. However, the
modem isn't detected.
According to what I've read in
http://www.mail-archive.com/[E
I've purchased a new US Robotics Performance Pro
modem that is guaranteed to run on Linux. According to the manual it should be
automatically detected by any kernel newer than 2.3.x. However, the modem isn't
detected.
According to what I've read in http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECT
I've purchased a new US Robotics Performance Pro
modem that is guaranteed to run on Linux. According to the manual it should be
automatically detected by any kernel newer than 2.3.x. However, the modem isn't
detected.
According to what I've read in http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 12:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:55:48AM -0500, alex wrote:
> >
> > I'm interested in the Walmart/Microtel computers that come without
> > software but I'm wondering about their PCI modem.
> >
> > I und
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:55:48AM -0500, alex wrote:
>
> I'm interested in the Walmart/Microtel computers that come without
> software but I'm wondering about their PCI modem.
>
> I understand that some PCI modems can be adapted for use in Linux but
> what I
I'm interested in the Walmart/Microtel computers that come without
software but I'm wondering about their PCI modem.
I understand that some PCI modems can be adapted for use in Linux but
what I'd like to know is
if once the PCI modem is adapted for Linux, can it still be
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:49:11AM +1100, Steve Kieu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found from linmodems.org that sm56 is supported; and
> follow the link i got the motorola page but it says
> there are two types and they only have driver for
> Motorola SM56 PCI modem (not speaker). I dont
> I've used the Motorola SM56 PCI modem when I was
> still using
Is your modem is SM56 PCI or SM56 PCI Speaker ?
my friend's has the word speaker that is why I was
wondering if it works with that driver. Anyway he
bought it bundled with the computer, so ..
About winmodem, I am
=?iso-8859-1?q?Steve=20Kieu?= wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I found from linmodems.org that sm56 is supported; and
>follow the link i got the motorola page but it says
>there are two types and they only have driver for
>Motorola SM56 PCI modem (not speaker). I dont know if
>I could us
Hi,
I found from linmodems.org that sm56 is supported; and
follow the link i got the motorola page but it says
there are two types and they only have driver for
Motorola SM56 PCI modem (not speaker). I dont know if
I could use this driver ;
If anyone has used or any experience on that matter
for the help.
> Wayne
>
> Slaven Peles wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
> > > | Hi,
> > > | I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
>
020ff].
followed by the next entry
Thanks for the help.
Wayne
Slaven Peles wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
> > | Hi,
> > | I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
> | Hi,
> | I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
> | I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
> | cat /proc/pci &
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
| I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
| cat /proc/pci > pci.txt
| Looking at the file I see that the system see the card
Hi,
I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
cat /proc/pci > pci.txt
Looking at the file I see that the system see the card on IRQ 5 but,
I don't see any port address. can someone tell
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:59:20PM +0100, Aaron Hess wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
> having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
> 56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
> modem, no linux :(
Make sure your modem is supported. Take a l
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:59:20PM +0100, Aaron Hess wrote:
> I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
> having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
> 56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
> modem, no linux :(
Since you're not telling WHAT problems, I can hardl
Hi,
I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
modem, no linux :(
Aaron
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk addre
r now. This list has been helpful
in the past, so I am trying here first. I posted when I was
planning this network, at least two years ago. It is now an
actuality.
3Com/USR 2977 PCI modem.
I would like to hear from anyone who has one of these running
under Debian. On the
Thanks for the pointers I got if figured out
- Original Message -
From: "Ronald L. Chichester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: Internal PCI modem with Potato
> Mark Sco
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:40:51PM -, Mark Scott wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I am having trouble getting my linux to recognise my pci internal modem. I
> am new to the Intel platform but have succesfully managed to install potato
> on my m68k mac and connect using ppp albeit with an external modem
ttp://www.signalground.com/article/
The article was entitled "Going Linux, Part 3,: Choosing a Modem for Linux" by
Tom Moran. In it, he discusses getting a PCI modem going in Linux. The article
wasn't (too) distro specific, so you should be able to figure it out. I got a
PCI modem
Hello all
I am having trouble getting my linux to recognise my pci internal modem. I
am new to the Intel platform but have succesfully managed to install potato
on my m68k mac and connect using ppp albeit with an external modem.
I have searched the archives and was not able to find any pointers
I've bought computer parts through compuplus and built a computer
for me. I have, in my opinion, a weird problem.
Modem is (from output of lspci -v) "Serial controller: US
Robotics/3Com 56K FaxModem Model 5610 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [16550])
Subsystem: US Robotics/3Com USR 56k Inte
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Curtis Hogg wrote:
buckmi >>
buckmi >> 4. reboot.
buckmi >
buckmi >Done, but modem still doesn't respond to anything.
buckmi >
buckmi >
buckmi >Any other ideas?
buckmi >
buckmi >-- Curtis Hogg
to see if it is a winmodem or not i'd email the company that makes it and
ask them
My roommate has a PCI modem as well, though it's made by ESS not Wisecom..
supposedly it's not a Winmodem, but who can really tell.
> assigned to a serial device. Do the following:
>
> 1. make sure you have pciutils installed.
Check
>
> 2. run lspci -v and look for a
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) wrote:
> One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
> Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
> modem?
--
I believe most of the Wisecom modems were LT (Lucent Technologies) Winmodems.
The Wiseco
Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) writes:
> One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
> Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
> modem?
> >From last compilation I found out in
> /proc/pci
> a line like
> communication card
&g
WINmodem ?
Matth
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) wrote:
> One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
> Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
> modem?
> >From last compilation I found out in
> /proc/pci
> a line li
One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
modem?
>From last compilation I found out in
/proc/pci
a line like
communication card
but vendor and chip data are unknown.
Have someone suggestions?
Thanks.
ASED MODEM***
>>
>[snip]
>
>I am delighted to have this information.
>
>Would you please name other PCI modems that can be made usable
>under Linux? I have been told that only Multitech has a PCI modem
>that is not a WinModem, (i.e., a modem where
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:12:27AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote:
> I was just given a PCI modem by a friend of mine and he calims it's a PNP
> modem but not a winmodem. I hope he's right, but I don't know how to tell
> if it's a winmodem. Debian sees the modem when I c
Thanks a lot Oleg. You have helped a lot of us!!
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Robert Rati wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:12:27 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-user@lists.
shaleh writes:
> *ALL* PCI modems I have seen are windows modems (winmodem is actually a
> USR tm).
Multitech reportedly sells a non-winmodem PCI modem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
name other PCI modems that can be made usable
under Linux? I have been told that only Multitech has a PCI modem
that is not a WinModem, (i.e., a modem where the details of
critical functionality are kept propriatary.)
--David
David Teague, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Because software support
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Robert Rati wrote:
> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:12:27 -0500 (EST)
> From: Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: PCI modem
> Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:23:43 +
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.or
he problem is simply that there isn't yet support for PCI modems. I
expect that since modems seem to be going this way in general that sooner or
later
someone will get device support finished for them. I'm not sure if anyone's
working on
this or not.
Robert Rati wrote:
> I was just
*ALL* PCI modems I have seen are windows modems (winmodem is actually a USR tm).
At least you did not pay for it (-:
I was just given a PCI modem by a friend of mine and he calims it's a PNP
modem but not a winmodem. I hope he's right, but I don't know how to tell
if it's a winmodem. Debian sees the modem when I cat /proc/pci and calls
it a serial interface card (same thing windows calls
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Greg Scharrer wrote:
My experience with PCI modems is that they are
likely to be winmodems. My supplier stopped selling the
ISA modems in favour of the new PCI modems, but now
is restocking ISAs. I had problems with the PCI modems
in Win 95&98. Auto-locating the drive
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
[ snip ]
: > IMO it's embarrasing that most PCI modem manufacturers are making them
: > winmodems. Talk about cheap!
:
: I'm not sure this is true. The PCI modem I bought last week is linux
: incompatible; it uses shared memory i
odems. Is one kind
> : > better than the other?
> :
> : Multitech reportedly makes one PCI modem that is not a winmodem. So far as
> : I know all others are. I'd stay away from PCI modems.
>
> This will be difficult in the future as the ISA bus disappears - many
>
: > better than the other?
> :
> : Multitech reportedly makes one PCI modem that is not a winmodem. So far as
> : I know all others are. I'd stay away from PCI modems.
>
> This will be difficult in the future as the ISA bus disappears - many
> new PCs have no ISA slots at all.
&
On 23 Apr 1999, John Hasler wrote:
: Greg Scharrer writes:
: > I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
: > to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
: > better than the other?
:
: Multitech reportedly makes one PCI mode
Subject: ISA vs PCI Modem
Date: Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 03:21:32AM +
In reply to:Greg Scharrer
Quoting Greg Scharrer([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
> to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI mode
Greg Scharrer writes:
> I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
> to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
> better than the other?
Multitech reportedly makes one PCI modem that is not a winmodem. So far as
I know all o
real issue in modems.
Ed.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Scharrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 1999 03:21
Subject: ISA vs PCI Modem
> I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
> to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Greg Scharrer wrote:
> I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
> to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
> better than the other? Does the type of board slot affect capability or
> performance?
I can't imagine th
I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
better than the other? Does the type of board slot affect capability or
performance?
Thanks for your help.
Greg Scharrer
Alex writes:
> I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
> modem, but it's PCI.
As far as I know, Multitech makes the only non-winmodem PCI modem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
> mothem, but it's PCI. The problem is that the system doesn't
> recognize it. Windows 98 recognizes it as a modem on COM3,
> using IRQ 9. I reconfigured pppd (using pppconfig) to use
> ttyS2 (= MS
Hi,
I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
mothem, but it's PCI. The problem is that the system doesn't
recognize it. Windows 98 recognizes it as a modem on COM3,
using IRQ 9. I reconfigured pppd (using pppconfig) to use
ttyS2 (= MSDOS COM 3). Then I used setserial to change the
Hi! I'm new to this list, but I've been using Debian (bo) for about eight
months. I hope you can help me with a question I haven't been able to
answer.
Can anyone point me to information about setting up a PCI modem card to
work with PPP and/or SLIP? I've been trying to fi
On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Rakesh Mohan wrote:
> I have PCI inter modem (AOpen FM 56H) on my PC. It works well with NT
> 4.0, but i am not able to configure it for debian 2.0
I think all of AOpen's modems are software based, like the USR WinModems.
Without the drivers (of which their are none for linux
Hello,
I have PCI inter modem (AOpen FM 56H) on my PC. It works well with NT
4.0, but i am not able to configure it for debian 2.0
This is what i get in /proc/pci for this modem device
Bus 0, device 10, function 0:
Serial Controller: Unknown vendor, Unknown devicec (Rev 1)
Vendir id = 1270, De
Once again, I must be the bearer of bad tidings...
The SupraMax PCI (and all of the Supra series PCI modems) will not work
with Linux. Please search the mailing list archives for my more detailed
explanations. Several people have had trouble with these modems
(including myself). You'll either n
This morning I tried to install Debian on a system with one of
these modems and was unsuccessful in creating a PPP connection.
The BIOS initializes the modem to IRQ 9, and Win95 says it's on
COM2. So I used /dev/ttyS1 as the device name and used setserial
to change the IRQ to 9, but still no succ
Howdy folks,
My roommate is trying to set up Debian 2.0 on his new AMD K6-2 system
and he's run into kind of a stumbling block that I am at a loss on. We
got his Soundblaster set up fine, which is an ISA card. However, we
can't figure out how to get the modem set up. It is a "plug-n-pray"
Creat
I have two problems. I am running bo on both my desktop computer and my
laptop. I have been very please with both.
Problem #1:
I have recently installed a PCI modem in my desktop and the kernel doesn't
recognize the PCI device. The bios reports it as:
Simple COMM Controller (I assume
77 matches
Mail list logo
