Re: PAM and exim redux

2002-06-22 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 11:30:44PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > problem went away. I don't know why you would get that error with > pam_unix.so. Not being able to read /etc/shadow, apparently. - -- Baloo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ver

Re: PAM and exim redux

2002-06-22 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:32:40PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: | On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 06:05:20PM -0400, Mark Roach wrote: | > Sounds like one of the modules in your /etc/pam.d/exim does not actually | > exist. Often, the debian-provided examples include pam_pwdb.so even | > though there _is_ no p

Re: PAM and exim redux

2002-06-22 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 06:05:20PM -0400, Mark Roach wrote: > Sounds like one of the modules in your /etc/pam.d/exim does not actually > exist. Often, the debian-provided examples include pam_pwdb.so even > though there _is_ no pam_pwdb.so AFAIK. verif

Re: PAM and exim redux

2002-06-22 Thread Mark Roach
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 02:08, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > OK, I'm trying the PAM route again, since I cranked debug up a bit and > got some interesting data... > > 2002-06-20 22:49:49 Authentication failed for cm099.55.234.24.lvcm.com > (skylos.dogpaw

PAM and exim redux

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, I'm trying the PAM route again, since I cranked debug up a bit and got some interesting data... 2002-06-20 22:49:49 Authentication failed for cm099.55.234.24.lvcm.com (skylos.dogpawz.com) [24.234.55.99]: Unable to authenticate at present: Module i