Re: Outlook and HTML

1999-12-04 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 3 Dec, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: Outlook and HTML" > Friday, December 03, 1999, 4:34:01 PM, Brian wrote: >> *- On 3 Dec, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote about "Re: Outlook and HTML" >>> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:28:57AM -0500, >>> Arcady Gen

Re: Outlook and HTML

1999-12-04 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, December 03, 1999, 4:34:01 PM, Brian wrote: > *- On 3 Dec, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote about "Re: Outlook and HTML" >> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:28:57AM -0500, >> Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 1. Standard signature separator is &quo

Re: Outlook and HTML

1999-12-04 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 3 Dec, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote about "Re: Outlook and HTML" > On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:28:57AM -0500, > Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. Standard signature separator is &q

Re: Outlook and HTML

1999-12-03 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:28:57AM -0500, Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Standard signature separator is "--" with a blank following it. Actually, it's "-- ". Notice the trailing space. Mutt, slrn, and Netscape all do this correctly. I'm sure most other software does as well. -- E

Re: Outlook and HTML

1999-12-03 Thread Arcady Genkin
"Paul McHale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I hunted down the problem with previous post(s) being in HTML. If you are > an outlook user and are interested in the resolution, please e-mail. Most > people apparently have this set correctly and know how to detect HTML. > > Thanks to everyone for t

Outlook and HTML

1999-12-02 Thread Paul McHale
Hi, I hunted down the problem with previous post(s) being in HTML. If you are an outlook user and are interested in the resolution, please e-mail. Most people apparently have this set correctly and know how to detect HTML. Thanks to everyone for the constructive comments regarding replying styl