On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 11:33 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like an absolutely shit-tier company. I hope there are
> > alternatives in the 3d-printing world, a world that I know almost
> > nothing about.
>
> Many, but Creality makes really cheap 3D printers, so
> lots of
Andy Smith wrote:
>
> Sounds like an absolutely shit-tier company. I hope there are
> alternatives in the 3d-printing world, a world that I know almost
> nothing about.
Many, but Creality makes really cheap 3D printers, so
lots of people buy them.
-dsr-
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 08:11:38AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> But Creality apparently disapproves of the hack and so has
> disabled it in the latest firmware.
So what I have learned from this thread is that there is a company
called Creality which:
- Supplies known-broken AppImages o
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 10:42 PM Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> On 30/07/2023 05:16, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > I'd already reached the conclusion that messing with openssl was a bad
> > idea. Unfortunately, Creality is unresponsive to pleas to fix their
> > software.
>
On 7/29/23 13:52, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 10:42 AM wrote:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl
error. Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x)
omits
On 30/07/2023 05:16, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I'd already reached the conclusion that messing with openssl was a bad
idea. Unfortunately, Creality is unresponsive to pleas to fix their
software.
I have no experience with 3d printers at all, but I am curious
concerning any progress w
y to revert to an earlier version of OpenSSL? I'm on an
> up-to-date
> > > > bookworm system.
> > >
> > > Install from https://snapshot.debian.org/.
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reply. I'll try that as soon as I get back to the
> box.
>
> Yo
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:14:30PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, 4:10 PM Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > > any way to revert to an earlier version of OpenSSL? I'm on an up-to-dat
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 10:42 AM wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl
> > > error. Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x)
> >
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl
> > error. Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x)
> > omits some X509 functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-
On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some
X509 functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1. (And someone
reports that installing it solves the
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:10:08PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
> > Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some X509
> &
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, 4:10 PM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
> > Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some
> X509
> >
On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
> Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some X509
> functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1. (And someone rep
I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some X509
functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1. (And someone reports that
installing it solves the problem.) But I can't find that package. Is
it might be a good idea for anyone considering adding additional software
> outside of what is officially packaged for a Debian Stable release to evaluate
> the information given on that page regarding different methods of doing so,
> and possible consequences.
I've seen manual Ope
You are correct, perhaps I shouldn't have recommended that given I'm not
sure of the OP's experience with Debian. I personally run it like this
with no issues.
On 18/01/2023 06:18, David wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:24, Ben Lavender wrote:
Stable releases don't always provide the latest
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:24, Ben Lavender wrote:
> Stable releases don't always provide the latest software, generally that
> isn't always respectively "stable".
>
> The latest seems to be available via the repositories Debian testing and
> unstable of which you can still run on Debian 11 if you
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:23:41PM +, Ben Lavender wrote:
> Stable releases don't always provide the latest software, generally that
> isn't always respectively "stable".
To be more precise, "stable" means "it doesn't change". In general,
no new major versions, especially not libraries (which
acker.debian.org/pkg/openssl
On 17/01/2023 14:33, Shaheena Kazi wrote:
Hello Team,
We are using Debian 11 with OpenSSL 1.1.1n
As OpenSSL 1.1.1 series is going EOL on 11th September 2023.
We would like to know if Debian is planning to add OpenSSL 3.0 support
on Debian 11 any time soon.
Regards,
On 2023-01-17 at 09:33, Shaheena Kazi wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> We are using Debian 11 with OpenSSL 1.1.1n
> As OpenSSL 1.1.1 series is going EOL on 11th September 2023.
>
> We would like to know if Debian is planning to add OpenSSL 3.0 support on
> Debian 11 any time s
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:03:23PM +0530, Shaheena Kazi wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> We are using Debian 11 with OpenSSL 1.1.1n
> As OpenSSL 1.1.1 series is going EOL on 11th September 2023.
>
> We would like to know if Debian is planning to add OpenSSL 3.0 support on
> Debian
Hello Team,
We are using Debian 11 with OpenSSL 1.1.1n
As OpenSSL 1.1.1 series is going EOL on 11th September 2023.
We would like to know if Debian is planning to add OpenSSL 3.0 support on
Debian 11 any time soon.
Regards,
Hi,
16 oct. 2020 à 15:58 de philipp.ew...@digionline.de:
> i try to encrypt a String with OpenSSL but its not working as i want.
>
> echo -n "That's the text" | openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -a -A -nosalt
>
I don't know if your question is just theoretical or if you h
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 06:24:31PM +0200, Philipp Ewald wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> I have used this : openssl base64 -d instead of "base64 -d" ..
You're welcome.
Reco
Thank you!
I have used this : openssl base64 -d instead of "base64 -d" ..
On 16.10.20 18:09, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Philipp Ewald wrote:
echo -n "That's the text" | openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -a -A -nosalt
g
Hi.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Philipp Ewald wrote:
> echo -n "That's the text" | openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -a -A -nosalt
>
> gives me following "String":
> ttn39k7YiglePLvmmc6s+w==
Correct so far, assuming that you've entered a
Hey everyone,
i try to encrypt a String with OpenSSL but its not working as i want.
echo -n "That's the text" | openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -a -A -nosalt
gives me following "String":
ttn39k7YiglePLvmmc6s+w==
echo -n "ttn39k7YiglePLvmmc6s+w==" | openssl base6
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:26:13PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> openssh-server : Depends: openssh-client (= 1:7.9p1-10+deb10u1) but
> 1:7.9p1-10+deb10u2 is to be installed
> Depends: openssh-sftp-server but it is not going to be
This is what I see when trying to install openssl-server on a fresh install of
Debian-10.4:
apt install -f openssh-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an
On 08.09.19 20:03, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ulf Volmer wrote:
>>
>> On 08.09.19 01:28, Tapas Mishra wrote:
>>
>>> configure: error: *** OpenSSL headers missing
>>
>> Install libssl-dev.
>
> Ok thanks I did install libs
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ulf Volmer wrote:
>
> On 08.09.19 01:28, Tapas Mishra wrote:
>
> > configure: error: *** OpenSSL headers missing
>
> Install libssl-dev.
Ok thanks I did install libssl-dev
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
https://pastebin.com/EYpswMRv
I go
On 08.09.19 01:28, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> configure: error: *** OpenSSL headers missing
Install libssl-dev.
Best regards
Ulf
/ANGa0c7q
to get rid of above error I did
sudo apt-get install libz-dev
Then I did ./configure and found a new error
configure: error: *** OpenSSL headers missing
full message can be seen here
https://pastebin.com/9XFUYZkk
I then tried doing
debian@debian:~/psiphon/openssh-5.9p1$ sudo apt-get install
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:11:54 +0100
Michael Wagner wrote:
Hello Michael,
>You must change /etc/aliases, when an MTA is installed.
>Hth Michael
I knew it was something simple. Thanks Michael.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediate
On Nov 06, 2018 at 16:43:57, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:15:48 + Jan Foniok wrote:
> >Is there a package that needs to be installed for that to happen?
>
> I believe that exim is installed (at least in part) for this.
> >
> >On my postfix installation there is no sysadmin alias
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:15:48 +
Jan Foniok wrote:
Hello Jan,
>Is there a package that needs to be installed for that to happen?
I believe that exim is installed (at least in part) for this.
>
>On my postfix installation there is no sysadmin alias (there is system,
I didn't mean sysadmin lite
Hello,
> On 5 Nov 2018, at 21:19, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> In spite of some effort I haven't found this sysadmin. Can you please
>> give me some pointers...
>
> Important information regarding an update, such as a change in default
> behaviour of a package, is emailed to the sysadmin user. This i
il package to check for mail locally (i.e. collect it from
/var/mail/username), or simply look at the message in /var/mail/ -
it's plain text, of course.
Just in case it's gone, I repeat the message in its entirety here:
openssl (1.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
Following various
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:36:10PM +0100, Jan Foniok wrote:
> What is the best way out? Can TLS1.0 and 1.1 be enabled?
TLS 1.0 is insecure and should never be used. TLS 1.1 is questionable.
If you google something like "tls 1.1 deprecated", you will get plenty
of results telling you why. The mo
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:29:51 +0100
Jan Foniok wrote:
Hello Jan,
>What is the best way out? Can TLS1.0 and 1.1 be enabled?
On 31 Oct, updates included info regarding TLS. Read the mail sent to
sysadmin for options.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)ra
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:29:51PM +0100, Jan Foniok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apple Mail on El Capitan doesn't seem to support protocols TLS higher than
> 1.0 or 1.1.
> Older hardware (9 years) is not supported by newer MacOS versions.
>
> A recent update of debian seems to have disabled these protocols
Hi,
Apple Mail on El Capitan doesn't seem to support protocols TLS higher than 1.0
or 1.1.
Older hardware (9 years) is not supported by newer MacOS versions.
A recent update of debian seems to have disabled these protocols for dovecot
imap.
What is the best way out? Can TLS1.0 and 1.1 be enabl
Hi,
Apple Mail on El Capitan doesn't seem to support protocols TLS higher than 1.0
or 1.1.
Older hardware (9 years) is not supported by newer MacOS versions.
A recent update of debian seems to have disabled these protocols for dovecot
imap.
What is the best way out? Can TLS1.0 and 1.1 be enabl
Hi.
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Pétùr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with
> openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version
> (stable).
>
> Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some ki
Hi,
I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with
openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version
(stable).
Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some kind of incompatibility between
openssl 1.1.1-1 and my radius server?
The error log with the 1.1.1-1
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:47:01PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> cat /etc/debian_version
>> 9.4
>
>> I do have openssl and libssl-dev installed;
>
> In stretch, libssl-dev is the development package for OpenSSL version 1.1.
> This is a
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:47:01PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> cat /etc/debian_version
> 9.4
> I do have openssl and libssl-dev installed;
In stretch, libssl-dev is the development package for OpenSSL version 1.1.
This is a relatively new version of OpenSSL, and it is not compat
cat /etc/debian_version
9.4
Summary:
Trying to compile a tool called `mailsend'
(https://github.com/muquit/mailsend/releases/)
(Which does not appear to be available in the regular repo).
But cannot get it to find openssl.
I do have openssl and libssl-dev inst
Hi,
After upgrading to openssl 1.1.1~~pre9-1, I am not able to establish VPN
connections (eg.nordvpn, work, etc.)
Mon Sep 3 11:19:34 2018 us=634061 OpenSSL: error:1425F18C:SSL
routines:ssl_choose_client_version:version too low
Mon Sep 3 11:19:34 2018 us=634070 TLS_ERROR: BIO read
Hi.
2018-08-22 14:43 GMT+09:00 Reco :
>> [question 1]
>> 'openssl ciphers -v' output ciphers. include SSL protocol version.
>> I have 'SSLv3' by 'openssl ciphers -v'
>> but debian openssl package disable ssl3. by configure option.
>> (
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 02:01:23PM +0900, Miwa Susumu wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> [question 1]
> 'openssl ciphers -v' output ciphers. include SSL protocol version.
> I have 'SSLv3' by 'openssl ciphers -v'
> but debian openssl package dis
Hi all.
[question 1]
'openssl ciphers -v' output ciphers. include SSL protocol version.
I have 'SSLv3' by 'openssl ciphers -v'
but debian openssl package disable ssl3. by configure option.
(see configure option in debian/rules file).
my openssl doesn't suppo
Le mardi 26 juin 2018, 17:16:59 CEST Charlie Gibbs a écrit :
> I've written a software suite using openssl-1.1.0f and libssh2-1.8.0.
> On my main development box, everything compiles fine, but on my laptop
> it can't find the OpenSSL library. Here's my console output:
>
On 2018-06-26 at 11:16, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> I've written a software suite using openssl-1.1.0f and libssh2-1.8.0.
> On my main development box, everything compiles fine, but on my laptop
> it can't find the OpenSSL library. Here's my console output:
>
> c
I've written a software suite using openssl-1.1.0f and libssh2-1.8.0.
On my main development box, everything compiles fine, but on my laptop
it can't find the OpenSSL library. Here's my console output:
cc -c revdate.c
cc -O -DLINUX -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpang
Brian wrote:
> And again:
>> I have a patch for that at:
>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4128
>>
>> I might upload this soon. The intention is still to ship Buster
>> with TLS 1.0 and 1.1 completly disabled.
> Couldn't be clearer. The m
affected by this change can use their
persuasive powers to bring about change. Microsoft, Google etc will
be overwhelmed by the Debian shock troops and fall into line.
And again:
> I have a patch for that at:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4128
>
> I might upload this soon. The i
nnot do TLS1.2 and that's the
> > only thing your mailserver advertizes - your users still won't be able
> > to connect after downgrading *their* end to TLS1.0.
> > Second, I somehow doubt that your users' MUAs are based on openssl.
> > Third, since then LD_PRELOAD
ill won't be able
> to connect after downgrading *their* end to TLS1.0.
> Second, I somehow doubt that your users' MUAs are based on openssl.
> Third, since then LD_PRELOAD works on Windows?
First, using your LD_PRELOAD hack on the Debian server, if a client
connects and DOES
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:23:11PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
[...]
> So I got bored and wrote the thing today. A customary disclaimer
> follows:
Wow. That was quick. Although I'm probably not going to use it:
- hey, thanks a bunch!
- I'm sur
Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 10:50:00PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
>> What is the right way for an admin to handle this problem on Debian
>> Testing?
> The only thing they told me back in the day was 'if you have to do a
> server - you use Debian stable'
d out libssl (and
> pinned it). Reco makes a LD_PRELOAD hack. Sven recompiles OpenSSL
> with patch removed.
> Did this or will this patch get into Stretch Stable yet as a security
> patch? If yes, then won't there be hundreds if not thousands of
> people screaming about this?
rs on Debian testing. Most are
running desktops. The most popular program on desktop is a browser, and
I know no popular GUI browser that's using openssl for cryptography.
Imagine, for instance if Mozilla said "we're dropping support of
anything except TLS1.2". Now *that* would produc
LD_PRELOAD hack. Sven recompiles OpenSSL
with patch removed.
Did this or will this patch get into Stretch Stable yet as a security
patch? If yes, then won't there be hundreds if not thousands of
people screaming about this?
I am wondering why it's so few of us who seem to be affected?
ne writes it. Maybe I'll do it this weekend.
>
> \o/
>
> ;-)
So I got bored and wrote the thing today. A customary disclaimer
follows:
1) The code is public domain.
2) The code is fugly so I don't claim the authorship. It's bound to
break in next version of openssl anyw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 06:01:18PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 09:57:09AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Isn't there any LD_PRELOAD trick one could play? [...]
> There'll be once someone writes it. Maybe I'l
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 09:57:09AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:40:46PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> > Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> > > Is there something I can set on Debian side to force this newer
> > > openss
Michael Grant wrote:
> I downloaded libssl1.1_1.1.0f-3_amd64.deb
> and did:
> dpkg -i libssl1.1_1.1.0f-3_amd64.deb
> restarted sendmail and dovecot and everyone can now connect.
Be sure to either pin or hold the package at that version:
"apt-mark hold libssl" or the next "apt dist-upgrade" wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:40:46PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Michael Grant wrote:
>
> > Is there something I can set on Debian side to force this newer
> > openssl to accept older 1.x connections?
>
> No, you can
the wild now for about
> 10 days.
you are running Debian Testing/Unstable to see this
change, it won't be pushed to "stable" for a few years
(maybe, we'll see).
my conversation with the getmail package maintainer
left it at "wontfix". i have not yet filed a bu
On 5 September 2017 at 22:40, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Michael Grant wrote:
>
>> Is there something I can set on Debian side to force this newer
>> openssl to accept older 1.x connections?
>
> No, you can't.
>
> Kurt Roeckx, the DD maintaining OpenSSL, patched it i
On 5 September 2017 at 20:29, Michael Grant wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 19:15, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 September 2017 13:40:00 Michael Grant wrote:
>>
>>> I upgraded openssl today in my server running testing. It installed
>>> version 1.1.0f-5
Michael Grant wrote:
> Is there something I can set on Debian side to force this newer
> openssl to accept older 1.x connections?
No, you can't.
Kurt Roeckx, the DD maintaining OpenSSL, patched it in such a way that a
program needs to call a special function of OpenSSL to override
On 5 September 2017 at 19:15, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 September 2017 13:40:00 Michael Grant wrote:
>
>> I upgraded openssl today in my server running testing. It installed
>> version 1.1.0f-5. To my surprise, my mac clients can no longer send
>> and receive
On Tuesday 05 September 2017 13:40:00 Michael Grant wrote:
> I upgraded openssl today in my server running testing. It installed
> version 1.1.0f-5. To my surprise, my mac clients can no longer send
> and receive email!
>
As that is a security related upgrade, I would next push th
I upgraded openssl today in my server running testing. It installed
version 1.1.0f-5. To my surprise, my mac clients can no longer send
and receive email!
How do I roll back to the previous version of openssl?
"apt-cache showpkg openssl" only shows version 1.1.0f-5.
apt install open
ow for me to find the magic
>>words to fiddle with to allow this to go
>>through.
>
> As announced the new version of openssl has disabled TLSv1 and TLSv1.1=20
> leaving only TLSv1.2.
> So if you have an old server without TLSv1.2, you can=E2=80=99t connect any=
> more.
Sven Hartge writes:
> Kamil Jońca wrote:
>> Stephan Seitz writes:
>
[...]
>
>> It is also break lot of other thigs: for example: my radius server
>> start to refuse to authenticate win8 and win8 clients and android
>> tablets.
>
> Windows 8, too? It would be nice if you could add this to the th
Kamil Jońca wrote:
> Stephan Seitz writes:
>> As announced the new version of openssl has disabled TLSv1 and
>> TLSv1.1 leaving only TLSv1.2. So if you have an old server without
>> TLSv1.2, you can’t connect anymore.
> It is also break lot of other thigs: for e
ght now for me to find the magic
>>words to fiddle with to allow this to go
>>through.
>
> As announced the new version of openssl has disabled TLSv1 and TLSv1.1
> leaving only TLSv1.2.
> So if you have an old server without TLSv1.2, you can’t connect anymore.
It is also
As announced the new version of openssl has disabled TLSv1 and TLSv1.1
leaving only TLSv1.2.
So if you have an old server without TLSv1.2, you can’t connect anymore.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |
smime.p7s
Description: S
fyi,
may break your getting of mail process.
(i'm using getmail).
luckily downgrading the two packages restores
things to working again.
no time right now for me to find the magic
words to fiddle with to allow this to go
through.
songbird
Hi,
I have some of my documents encrypted with openssl bf-cbc for
confidentiality. I however see that after a dist-upgrade my new system is
refusing to decrypting the data whereas my old systems are still decrypting
the docs fine.
on my new system:
$ cat a.enc | openssl bf-cbc -d > /tm
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:57:33PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Thanks very much, that was the correct name: libssl-dev, not openssl-dev or
> similar...Nick
In general, use apt-cache search to find packages when you don't know
the exact names.
$ apt-cache search --names-only ssl
Thanks very much, that was the correct name: libssl-dev, not openssl-dev or
similar...Nick
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:33 PM, deloptes wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > I can't tell which debian 8.4 package provides the C headers for OpenSSL,
> > the "Usual sus
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> I can't tell which debian 8.4 package provides the C headers for OpenSSL,
> the "Usual suspects" such as openssl-devel and the like do not exist,
> dpkg-query doesn't seem to find anything likely. Would some kind person
> give me a
I can't tell which debian 8.4 package provides the C headers for OpenSSL,
the "Usual suspects" such as openssl-devel and the like do not exist,
dpkg-query doesn't seem to find anything likely. Would some kind person
give me a clue where to find the OpenSSL C header files in
On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote:
>> > Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages
>> > "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get th
On Fri 12 Aug 2016 at 11:04:31 (+0200), Daniel wrote:
> Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages
> "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from
> jessie/main and that the version from jessie/updates/main is
> ignored because of
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote:
> > Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages
> > "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from
> > jessie/main an
On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote:
> Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages
> "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from
> jessie/main and that the version from jessie/updates/main is
> ignored because of the extra letter in the
Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages
"openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from
jessie/main and that the version from jessie/updates/main is
ignored because of the extra letter in the version number.
Isn't 1.0.1k-3+deb8u5 the pre
vides them?
> Thanks.Nick
Others have already provided you with good answers. But since my
favorite approach is missing, I thought I would chime in.
I often use "apt-cache search" for issues like this. For example in this case
% apt-cache search openssl header files
dlang-openss
On 07/15/2016 05:14 PM, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Hi - I'm somewhat new to debian. I'm building the nagios NRPE plugin
on Debian Jessie. Its configure script fails the check for SSL header
files with "Cannot find SSL headers". Which Debian package provides
them? Thanks.Nick
Please refer to
On 07/15/2016 05:14 PM, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Hi - I'm somewhat new to debian. I'm building the nagios NRPE plugin
on Debian Jessie. Its configure script fails the check for SSL header
files with "Cannot find SSL headers". Which Debian package provides
them? Thanks.Nick
Maybe you need
Hi - I'm somewhat new to debian. I'm building the nagios NRPE plugin on
Debian Jessie. Its configure script fails the check for SSL header files
with "Cannot find SSL headers". Which Debian package provides them?
Thanks.Nick
ng0:
>
> I am in the position where I have to run at least one Debian
> stable based server, and with the recent upgrade of a search
> engine, I can no longer use its proxy functionality.
> This would require a version of OpenSSL which is not available in
> Debian stable at
> engine, I can no longer use its proxy functionality.
> This would require a version of OpenSSL which is not available in
> Debian stable at this point.
>
> When is the next release candidate of Debian planed which would
> version bump openssl?
> If it's more than half
I am not subscribed and don't plan to - please keep me in CC when
replying.
Hi,
I am in the position where I have to run at least one Debian
stable based server, and with the recent upgrade of a search
engine, I can no longer use its proxy functionality.
This would require a version of Op
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
