Re: OpenSSH grief part 2

2001-03-27 Thread Luigi Fabio
On 25 Mar 2001, at 10:24, Krzys Majewski wrote: > it gives "1.99", that probably means the daemon is capable of ssh2. > Make sure you have a host DSA key (/etc/ssh/host_key or whatever) and > a user DSA key (~/.ssh/identity or whatever). It does say 1.99 - and I am proud to say that installing li

Re: OpenSSH grief part 2

2001-03-25 Thread Krzys Majewski
Not sure what's going on.. have you tried regenerating your personal rsa and/or dsa keys (with ssh-keygen)? It looks like your keys are being rejected for whatever reason.. if you can fix this, it would at least pare down the number of errors. If you telnet to port 22 on the remote box, doe

Re: OpenSSH grief part 2

2001-03-25 Thread Luigi Fabio
On 23 Mar 2001, at 20:52, Krzys Majewski wrote: > What happens if you ssh -v -v -v to both the good machine and the bad > machine? The output below suggests that the bad machine is choking on > both your rsa key and your dsa key. The good machine only chokes on > the dsa key, so maybe it's us

Re: OpenSSH grief part 2

2001-03-23 Thread Krzys Majewski
What happens if you ssh -v -v -v to both the good machine and the bad machine? The output below suggests that the bad machine is choking on both your rsa key and your dsa key. The good machine only chokes on the dsa key, so maybe it's using whatever rsa key you give it (and perhaps this is

OpenSSH grief part 2

2001-03-23 Thread Luigi Fabio
Well, I finally got something different. I upgraded to 2.5.2p2 and rebuilt everything. Very good, ./sshd -ddd - p 9xxx gets me this on the working machine: debug1: Seeding random number generator debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_2.5.2p2 debug1: load_private_key_autodetect: type 0 RSA1 debug3: Bad RSA1