On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:03:55AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> can't use it. If anything, I would have thought that having the same
> name as a Free office suite would be _good publicity_ (especially since
> the office suite is evidently far better known than they are), but I
> guess their legal depa
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:20:42PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Prerelease packages for OpenOffice.org are now available from the unstable
> > section of our mirrors (http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html).
>
> Can someone tell me _why_ this
Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Prerelease packages for OpenOffice.org are now available from the unstable
> section of our mirrors (http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html).
Can someone tell me _why_ this project uses the name `OpenOffice.org' as
a name for their software? W
Prerelease packages for OpenOffice.org are now available from the unstable
section of our mirrors (http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html).
Please let us know if you have any problems with this version other than the
problems already known in the BTS.
Changelog for this release:
open
4 matches
Mail list logo
