Re: Open Office question.

2009-07-23 Thread lee
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:39:09AM -0700, Bob McGowan wrote: > lee wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:12:40PM -0400, I Rattan wrote: > >> I did dist-upgrade and the new openffice (3.1) > >> and it does display a .php file (goal is to convert > >> to .txt), the older version did do this function.

Re: Open Office question.

2009-07-23 Thread Bob McGowan
lee wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:12:40PM -0400, I Rattan wrote: >> I did dist-upgrade and the new openffice (3.1) >> and it does display a .php file (goal is to convert >> to .txt), the older version did do this function. > > What's the difference between a php file and a text file? > Tec

Re: Open Office question.

2009-07-22 Thread lee
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:12:40PM -0400, I Rattan wrote: > > I did dist-upgrade and the new openffice (3.1) > and it does display a .php file (goal is to convert > to .txt), the older version did do this function. What's the difference between a php file and a text file? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: Open Office question.

2009-07-22 Thread Siggy Brentrup
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 13:56 -0400, j j wrote: > Still can't open .php > but Bluefish editor can. > http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ Last time I looked OOo tried to be a browser too (a horrible one), maybe it is trying to run php on the code? If so, somewhere in the Preferences you probably can di

Re: Open Office question.

2009-07-22 Thread j j
Still can't open .php but Bluefish editor can. http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:12 PM, I Rattan wrote: > > I did dist-upgrade and the new openffice (3.1) > and it does display a .php file (goal is to convert > to .txt), the older version did do this function. > > Any id

Open Office question.

2009-07-22 Thread I Rattan
I did dist-upgrade and the new openffice (3.1) and it does display a .php file (goal is to convert to .txt), the older version did do this function. Any ideas? -ishwar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-04 Thread Geoff D
--- John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Try adding the sources.list line: > > > > deb http://people.debian.org/~nidd/debian/ > unstable/ > > > > and then apt-get install openoffice. That should > work, if you're > > running unstable anyway (and possibly woody, bu

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-04 Thread John Foster
Brian Nelson wrote: > Try adding the sources.list line: > > deb http://people.debian.org/~nidd/debian/ unstable/ > > and then apt-get install openoffice. That should work, if you're > running unstable anyway (and possibly woody, but probably not potato). - I

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Brian Nelson
"Kurt Yoder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joachim Trinkwitz said: > > "Karsten M. Self" writes: > > > >> on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >> wrote: > >> > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office > >> > package to be had as a deb? I was thinking

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:44:26PM +0100, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote: > > AFAIK&C: no. > > Yes, it is: put the following line in your sources.list > >deb http://www.openoffice.de/debian/ potato main > > then say: > ># apt-get update ; apt-get install openoffice > > and more than 75 MB of

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Kurt Yoder
Joachim Trinkwitz said: > "Karsten M. Self" writes: > >> on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> wrote: >> > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office >> > package to be had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to >> > install it that way rather th

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
"Karsten M. Self" writes: > on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office package to be > > had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to install it that way rather > > than installing the OpenOffice.org b

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-02-26 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office package to be > had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to install it that way rather > than installing the OpenOffice.org binary which doesn't use package > m

YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-02-22 Thread Timothy R. Butler
This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office package to be had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to install it that way rather than installing the OpenOffice.org binary which doesn't use package management. Thanks, Tim -- -