Re: One Last Note

2003-08-14 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 08:52, Alan Connor wrote: > You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for > sure. > > You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition > against CR. > > "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!" > > Oh yes it could. And

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Lamb
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 01:51:39 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What? The group's reputation preceeds it? Or you already know about > the resident kooks there? Or just the name alone? Furry + Something Positive a few weeks back about covers it. :) -- Steve C. Lamb

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-14 Thread leroyljr
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote: > > You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for > sure. > > You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition > against CR. > > "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!" > > Oh y

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote: > "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!" Alan, to be honest, I haven't seen anybody so far out since mhirtes on alt.fan.furry. (Everybody else can get some amusement value out of h

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Lamb
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:26:54 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan, to be honest, I haven't seen anybody so far out since mhirtes on > alt.fan.furry. (Everybody else can get some amusement value out of > his posts on google) Hell, all I need to know is someone was further out th

One Last Note

2003-08-12 Thread Alan Connor
You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for sure. You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition against CR. "No!" you say, in shock, "It couldn't be HIM?!" Oh yes it could. And it is. They were the main reason I chose the list for my provoc

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-10 Thread Jesse Meyer
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003, Alan Connor wrote: > You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for > sure. First of all, whoever wants to hit me with a cluebat for replying can - I probably deserve it. The debian-user mailing list does get spammed - I believe that you don't have t

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-09 Thread Steve Lamb
On 09 Aug 2003 00:51:30 +0300 Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 08:52, Alan Connor wrote: > > You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for > > sure. > > You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition > > against CR.

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-09 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote: | | You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for | sure. Yeah right. Spammers don't subscribe to mailing lists like this one. | You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition | again

Re: One Last Note

2003-08-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:35:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Hell, all I need to know is someone was further out than someone else on > alt.fan.furry to get the giggles. What? The group's reputation preceeds it? Or you already know about the re