Jon Dowland wrote:
At 1146225401 past the epoch, Mike McCarty wrote:
Err, I'd rather report it to the ISP of the originator, if it's
really truly patently and deliberately offensive.
Fair enough, but why copy the list in?
It was unintentional to copy the original message back to the list.
At 1146225401 past the epoch, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Err, I'd rather report it to the ISP of the originator, if it's
> really truly patently and deliberately offensive.
Fair enough, but why copy the list in?
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:56:41 -0500
Mike McCarty wrote:
Leonid Grinberg wrote:
(c) Just ignore it.
Err, I'd rather report it to the ISP of the originator, if it's
really truly patently and deliberately offensive. I did that
a day or so ago with one which had deliberatel
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:56:41 -0500
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Leonid Grinberg wrote:
>
>> (c) Just ignore it.
>
> Err, I'd rather report it to the ISP of the originator, if it's
> really truly patently and deliberately offensive. I did that
> a day or so ago with one which had deliberately offensive
>
On Fri, April 28, 2006 11:09 am, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Jan Schledermann wrote:
>> Before you slip out of the generous mood, I'd like to receive an invite for
>> gmail from you (on the obfuscated email at the bottom of this posting)
>
> If anyone else needs a gmail invite, please ask. I have do
Leonid Grinberg wrote:
Mr. Bird is right, but there is another thing you need to understand.
There are really no TOS that debian-user has, because people can send
to it without agreeing to anything. If you got an offensive email:
(a) All of us did too
(b) They broke no TOS
I was with you until
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Jan Schledermann wrote:
>> Before you slip out of the generous mood, I'd like to receive an invite
>> for gmail from you (on the obfuscated email at the bottom of this
>> posting)
>
> If anyone else needs a gmail invite, please ask. I have dozens spare.
>
Thanx a lot
J
On Friday, April 28, 2006 5:09 PM GMT,
Martin A. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jan Schledermann wrote:
Before you slip out of the generous mood, I'd like to receive an
invite for gmail from you (on the obfuscated email at the bottom of
this posting)
If anyone else needs a gmail invite, pl
Jan Schledermann wrote:
Before you slip out of the generous mood, I'd like to receive an invite for
gmail from you (on the obfuscated email at the bottom of this posting)
If anyone else needs a gmail invite, please ask. I have dozens spare.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ |
Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> Mr. Bird is right, but there is another thing you need to understand.
> There are really no TOS that debian-user has, because people can send
> to it without agreeing to anything. If you got an offensive email:
>
> (a) All of us did too
> (b) They broke no TOS
> (c) Just
Mr. Bird is right, but there is another thing you need to understand.
There are really no TOS that debian-user has, because people can send
to it without agreeing to anything. If you got an offensive email:
(a) All of us did too
(b) They broke no TOS
(c) Just ignore it.
If you can't set up a dec
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 21:15, Mike McCarty wrote:
> I received this message today, apparently from
> ylpvm44-ext.prodigy.net (207.115.57.75)
> although it has forged headers.
Mr McCarty:
You have just reported your own ISPs mail server
to itself for spamming. Apparently you can't parse
mail heade
Hello,
I received this message today, apparently from
ylpvm44-ext.prodigy.net (207.115.57.75)
although it has forged headers.
I suspect that this message violates your TOS
with this person.
Please investigate and handle as appropriate.
If you need more information, you may contact me
at [EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo
