On 21/08/11 19:10, consul tores wrote:
> 2011/8/19 Scott Ferguson :
>> On 20/08/11 03:50, consul tores wrote:
>>> 2011/8/18 Scott Ferguson :
On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Some people think
2011/8/19 Scott Ferguson :
> On 20/08/11 03:50, consul tores wrote:
>> 2011/8/18 Scott Ferguson :
>>> On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote:
I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
>
>
>
>>>
>>
>> Some people think that both, could be a security risk, because they
>
On 20/08/11 03:50, consul tores wrote:
> 2011/8/18 Scott Ferguson :
>> On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>> I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
>>
>
> Some people think that both, could be a security risk, because they
> run under java, Is not it?
>
>
Wow!
2011/8/18 Scott Ferguson :
> On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote:
>> I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
>> I ask here because this is the list on which I discovered the
>> existence of (and the need for) these add-ons to web browsers.
>
>
> NotScripts uses a uniqu
On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
> I ask here because this is the list on which I discovered the
> existence of (and the need for) these add-ons to web browsers.
NotScripts uses a unique and novel method to provide this “N
I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
I ask here because this is the list on which I discovered the
existence of (and the need for) these add-ons to web browsers.
1. There seems not to be a direct, feature for feature add-on to
Chrome that corresponds to noscript for Ic
6 matches
Mail list logo
