> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 06:30:59PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:18:31 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak writes:
> > >> which are useful unless you have to manage lots of those boxes,
> >
> > >I wouldn't know.
> > >but isn't that what OpenView is for? and is unbeatable in that fie
> > which are useful unless you have to manage lots of those boxes,
> I wouldn't know.
> but isn't that what OpenView is for? and is unbeatable in that field?
>
Openview doesn't manage those boxes specifically. It's an expensive
SNMP-mib
collector/network-discovery-agent/oh-crap-this-node-went-
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 06:30:59PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:18:31 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak writes:
> >> which are useful unless you have to manage lots of those boxes,
>
> >I wouldn't know.
> >but isn't that what OpenView is for? and is unbeatable in that field?
>
> I
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:18:31 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak writes:
>> which are useful unless you have to manage lots of those boxes,
>I wouldn't know.
>but isn't that what OpenView is for? and is unbeatable in that field?
I consider BrokenView to be in the field of BigBuckMoneyBurn-ware ...
If you´r
> which are useful unless you have to manage lots of those boxes,
I wouldn't know.
but isn't that what OpenView is for? and is unbeatable in that field?
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:08:02 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak writes:
>> I was wondering if there were any debian tools used for working with Cisco
>there is wonderfull perl module for configuring Cisco routers.
>besides that you've got all default tools like telnet;),snmp utils like
>mrtg etc..
which are
6 matches
Mail list logo
