Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-29 08:39:57, schrieb Ron Johnson: > So, in other words, you can't use your most efficient weapons > against cowards? > > That sucks. several GAS-Grenades have hit the Hospital of Falluja and killed over 1800 children! Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadmin

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-29 09:17:41, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > "2. It is prohibited in all circumstances to make any military objective > located within a concentration of civilians the object of attack by > air-delivered incendiary weapons." > > which clearly happened in Fallujah. Right! -- 1800 Children

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:49:05PM + Arnt Karlsen wrote: > .."maim first" is "the lowly infanteryman" and upward's job. > I was taught to aim for the heart. Center of body mass. In other words, kill. Ciao, Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:50:55 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/29/07 22:28, dave wrote: >> on Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:22:59PM -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> >>> Of course, wounding the enemy is nearly *always* more des

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:12:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:49:13PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 03/30/07 11:10, dave wrote: >> > on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:50:55AM -0500 Ron Johnson wrote: >> > >> >> So you shoot the possibly-wounded Iraqi?

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Kent West wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/26/07 03:55, Dan H. wrote: >> >>> After this thread has been going on for months, I decided to find out if >>> "sponge burning"

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:49:13PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 03/30/07 11:10, dave wrote: > > on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:50:55AM -0500 Ron Johnson wrote: > > > >> So you shoot the possibly-wounded Iraqi? > > > > If he's in the way, and others are shooting at you. > > I can already hear Arnt

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/07 11:10, dave wrote: > on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:50:55AM -0500 Ron Johnson wrote: > >> So you shoot the possibly-wounded Iraqi? > > If he's in the way, and others are shooting at you. I can already hear Arnt's squeal of righteous indigna

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:50:55AM -0500 Ron Johnson wrote: > So you shoot the possibly-wounded Iraqi? If he's in the way, and others are shooting at you. > What about the live > grenade he might be lying on? > Turn him over later, carefully. > That doesn't seem to be the case with the US

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/29/07 22:28, dave wrote: > on Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:22:59PM -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > >> Of course, wounding the enemy is nearly *always* more desirable than >> outright killing him. That is because every wounded soldier takes at >>

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:22:59PM -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Of course, wounding the enemy is nearly *always* more desirable than > outright killing him. That is because every wounded soldier takes at > least one other soldier (or other person, even if not a soldier) in > order to care f

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:46:15AM + Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..even killing the enemy is illegal if you can "just" wound him to put > him out of the war, the most effective way is have your snipers plink > femurs at balls height. ;o) > Hmm. The 50 cal. sniper rifle in use today goes thro

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 08:47:37PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:22:59PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > > Of course, wounding the enemy is nearly *always* more desirable than > > outright killing him. That is because every wounded soldier takes at > > least on

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:22:59 -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:46:15AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > ..even killing the enemy is illegal if you can "just" wound him to put > > him out of the war, the most effective way is have your snipers plin

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:22:59PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:46:15AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > ..even killing the enemy is illegal if you can "just" wound him to put > > him out of the war, the most effective way is have your snipers plink > > femurs

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 22:22 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:46:15AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > ..even killing the enemy is illegal if you can "just" wound him to put > > him out of the war, the most effective way is have your snipers plink > > femurs at bal

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:46:15AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..even killing the enemy is illegal if you can "just" wound him to put > him out of the war, the most effective way is have your snipers plink > femurs at balls height. ;o) > Of course, wounding the enemy is nearly *always* mor

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:25:45 -0400, Celejar wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:03:00 + (UTC) Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> ..nukes will often (but not always) be illegal for precisely that >> reason, _excessive_ collateral damage, "a little is ok", a few oth

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:17:41 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 28 Mar, Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >> Actually, the war itself is a "war of aggression", which is a > >> war crime. Other actions which

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/29/07 08:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > > Even the protocol which you mention states: > > "2. It is prohibited in all circumstances to make any military > objective located within a concentration of civilians the object > of attack by ai

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On 28 Mar, Celejar wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [snip] > >> Actually, the war itself is a "war of aggression", which is a >> war crime. Other actions which may be war crimes: >> >> Torturing prisoners. >> Using white phosphorus a

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/28/07 16:42, Daniel B. wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > >> Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. > > Nope. That sounds like clear weather to me. Sshhh!!! Disagreeing with delusional know-it-alls only provokes them.

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:39 -0400, Daniel B. wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: > ...> > > The Celsius Thermometer wil drop significantly slower the the Fahrenheit > > one. > > Only if it has more insulation. Otherwise, the temperature drops at the > same speed. Of course, yes, the _numbers_ change a

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:03:00 + (UTC) Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:21:12 -0400, Celejar wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >> Actually, the war itself is a "war of

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:59:58 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/28/07 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On 25 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > [snip] >> Actually, the war itself is a "war of aggression", which is a >> w

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:21:12 -0400, Celejar wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [snip] > >> Actually, the war itself is a "war of aggression", which is a >> war crime. Other actions which may be war crimes: >> >> Torturin

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:32:57 -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Michelle Konzack wrote: >> 2) The white asses of Jews which have very late adopted the judaeism >> for arround a half century. >> >> > I was sympathetic to some of your arguments until this nonsense.

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > Actually, the war itself is a "war of aggression", which is a > war crime. Other actions which may be war crimes: > > Torturing prisoners. > Using white phosphorus against combatants and civilians >

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Paul Johnson wrote: Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. Nope. That sounds like clear weather to me. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Greg Folkert wrote: ...> The Celsius Thermometer wil drop significantly slower the the Fahrenheit one. Only if it has more insulation. Otherwise, the temperature drops at the same speed. Of course, yes, the _numbers_ change at different rates. :-) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:01:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 26 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:04:40PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > >> > >> Waitaminnit! > >> > >> We all know "creation and evolution are processes running under EMACS!" > >> > > Ahh, but s

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/28/07 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 25 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: [snip] > Actually, the war itself is a "war of aggression", which is a > war crime. Other actions which may be war crimes: > > Torturing prisoners. > Usi

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On 25 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > ... > > And I understood that you have yet to provide actual proof of war > crimes. You ramble on about the GCs and NATO treaties, but you have > yet to point out even one *specific* instance which when brought > before a court has a reasonable chance as b

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On 26 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:04:40PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: >> >> Waitaminnit! >> >> We all know "creation and evolution are processes running under EMACS!" >> > Ahh, but something must have been used to design Emacs (it did not > evolve by itself), and s

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:02:19 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Am 2007-03-18 22:36:12, schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez: >> Are these the same Muslims who are blowing innocent men women and >> children in markets schools and other public places? > > It seems you do not know anything

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:20:06PM -0500 Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/26/07 13:26, dave wrote: > > on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:23AM -0500 Kent West wrote: > 6 months? No. But it seems like it. > Oh. Yeah, you're right. Ciao, Dave -- T

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:06:41PM -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > We all know "creation and evolution are processes running under EMACS!" > > > Ahh, but something must have been used to design Emacs (it did not > evolve by itself), and so clearly vi is [the tool of] the intelligent > designe

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:06:41PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:04:40PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > > Waitaminnit! > > > > We all know "creation and evolution are processes running under EMACS!" > > > Ahh, but something must have been used to design Emacs (i

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Michelle Konzack wrote: 2) The white asses of Jews which have very late adopted the judaeism for arround a half century. I was sympathetic to some of your arguments until this nonsense. A little math indicates that you think there has been some huge upswing in white conversion to Jud

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-19 12:38:52, schrieb Ron Johnson: > It's a *hell* of a lot cheaper to *buy* it at $50/bbl than it is to > invade Iraq. That's why we prop up dictators. You are an asholem because before Sadam Husseing took over the power in Irak, the Irak was forced by the USA (and there friends) to se

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-19 17:48:35, schrieb Arnt Karlsen: > ..it _is_ a credible hint on why Muslims should join Hezbollah and get > nukes. But can the Muslims beat the (at least) 280 Nuclear weapons of Israel since they have transformed there Nuclear-Reactor in a Nuclear-Weapon Manufactory? This is, WHY Is

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-18 23:41:43, schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez: > Then if you think that "Bush's people" are involved in a fear campaign > with respect to the threat of Islamic extremism, then they Muslims' PR > campaign has been successful with you. > > Please go read the book described here: > > http://en.

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-18 19:57:32, schrieb Paul Scott: > If I'm not mistaken "we" killed far more innocent men and women and > children just bombing into Iraq than any "terrorists" have killed so far. At a quick research in my Database about Terroism, they are arround 9600 peoples killed in terrorist attacks

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Am 2007-03-18 22:36:12, schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez: > Are these the same Muslims who are blowing innocent men women and > children in markets schools and other public places? It seems you do not know anything about IRAKIEN suicide bombers. There are several studies of the UN, UNESCO, Internationa

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:04:40PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > Waitaminnit! > > We all know "creation and evolution are processes running under EMACS!" > Ahh, but something must have been used to design Emacs (it did not evolve by itself), and so clearly vi is [the tool of] the intelligent de

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:00:41PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:32:09PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > > I am wondering what some cultural anthropologist will have to asy about > > this in a few centuries' time :-) > > Easy: > > "Anybody know what th

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:00 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:32:09PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:26:10PM -0500, dave wrote: > > > on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:23AM -0500 Kent West wrote: > > > > > > > but it's all > > > > archiv

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:32:09PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:26:10PM -0500, dave wrote: > > on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:23AM -0500 Kent West wrote: > > > > > but it's all > > > archived if you're really curious. > > > > > > > It started with "Debian, Icewea

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/07 13:26, dave wrote: > on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:23AM -0500 Kent West wrote: > >> but it's all >> archived if you're really curious. >> > > It started with "Debian, Iceweasel, Firefox!" and has been running for > almost 6 months now.

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:26:10PM -0500, dave wrote: > on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:23AM -0500 Kent West wrote: > > > but it's all > > archived if you're really curious. > > > > It started with "Debian, Iceweasel, Firefox!" and has been running for > almost 6 months now. Fascinating. > I am

Re: OT: sponge burning!

on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:23AM -0500 Kent West wrote: > but it's all > archived if you're really curious. > It started with "Debian, Iceweasel, Firefox!" and has been running for almost 6 months now. Fascinating. Ciao, Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/07 03:55, Dan H. wrote: After this thread has been going on for months, I decided to find out if "sponge burning" is some kind of idiomatic expression because I'd never heard it before. So I googled "sponge burning".

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/07 03:55, Dan H. wrote: > After this thread has been going on for months, I decided to find out if > "sponge burning" is some kind of idiomatic expression because I'd never > heard it before. > > So I googled "sponge burning". > > But all I

Re: OT: sponge burning!

After this thread has been going on for months, I decided to find out if "sponge burning" is some kind of idiomatic expression because I'd never heard it before. So I googled "sponge burning". But all I got were references to this thread, dozens of them, and nothing else. Does this mean that this

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:36:18 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:20:52AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >> ..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue. >> >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:57:02 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Steve Lamb wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Paul Johnson wrote: >> Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. > > Just as white is the absence of color? Exactly! (Or black in the case of emitted (as opposed to pigment) color) -- P

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:14:16 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Arnt Karlsen wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:53:50 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote in >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >>> Paul Johnson wrote: Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. >>> Just as white is th

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:20:52AM +, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue. > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:57:02 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Mar 20

Re: OT: sponge burning!

..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:57:02 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:47:49 -0700, Paul wrote in message >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > Ro

Re: OT: sponge burning!

..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:05:38 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:09:48PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >> >> ..maybe, define "just full of all sorts of conspiracy theories", I >> don't watch TV, I p

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:53:50 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. >> Just as white is the absence of color? > .."white is the absence of color?" Yup. People say that

Re: OT: sponge burning!

..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:59:08 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:48:35PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >> >> ..Adolf Hitler has moral standing on his Führerbefehl because he put >> 400,000 men on th

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:53:50 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Paul Johnson wrote: >> Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. > > Just as white is the absence of color? .."white is the absence of color?" ..how come milk faces _change_ in color from they a

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On 19 Mar, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: >> Paul Johnson wrote: >> >Heh, Texans (and for that matter, most of the desert southwest and >> >California) crack me up in thinking that they get weather more than >> >30 days out of any given year..

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 02:30:47PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 03/20/07 14:18, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:56:43PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 03/20/07 13:20, Kent West wrote: > >>> Greg Folkert wrote: > Yah got me. I can't think of more old ones. You u

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/07 14:18, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:56:43PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 03/20/07 13:20, Kent West wrote: >>> Greg Folkert wrote: Yah got me. I can't think of more old ones. You used the last one I

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

on Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:21PM -0700 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > just think of the confusion when google turns up lists.debian.org for > burma-shave searches... Yow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:56:43PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 03/20/07 13:20, Kent West wrote: > > Greg Folkert wrote: > >> Yah got me. I can't think of more old ones. You used the last one I > >> could remember. > >> > > > > When memory fails > > To recall an ad > > It's time to shave > >

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/07 13:12, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:07 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:42:06AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Greg Folkert wrote in Article >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to >>> gmane.linux.

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/07 13:20, Kent West wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: >> Yah got me. I can't think of more old ones. You used the last one I >> could remember. >> > > When memory fails > To recall an ad > It's time to shave > Like dear old Dad. > > Burma-Shav

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Greg Folkert wrote: Yah got me. I can't think of more old ones. You used the last one I could remember. When memory fails To recall an ad It's time to shave Like dear old Dad. Burma-Shave -- Kent West http://kentwest.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:07 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:42:06AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Greg Folkert wrote in Article > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > > > Okay then, what is more bracing: > > > > > > -40 degrees

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 22:06 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/19/07 21:57, Greg Folkert wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 21:12 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 03/19/07 18:56, Greg Folkert wrote: > >> [snip] > >>> Okay then, what is more bracing

Re: OT: sponge burning!

Roberto C. Sánchez ha scritto: >... However, the *vast* majority of >people who join the military have plenty of other opportunities. > > hangman, headsman, butcher ... Luigi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:42:06AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote in Article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > Okay then, what is more bracing: > > > > -40 degrees Celsius > > -40 degrees Fahrenheit > > > > Come on... I am waiting!

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:41:17AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Not only that, but you can readily fix being cold with relatively available > equipment that's existed in some form or another for the last few thousand > years. Let's see Texas beat that with their wussy, electric-dependent air > c

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Paul Johnson wrote: > Cloudless sky with negligable wind is an absence of weather. Just as white is the absence of color? -- Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream? PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do... ---+

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Greg Folkert wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Okay then, what is more bracing: > > -40 degrees Celsius > -40 degrees Fahrenheit > > Come on... I am waiting! It's just as cold either way. It's one thing everybody agrees on: -40 is enough

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: >> Paul Johnson wrote: >> >Heh, Texans (and for that matter, most of the desert southwest and >> >California) crack me up in thinking that they ge

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Douglas Allan Tutty wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:52:09PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: >> > Paul Johnson wrote: > > >>> True. So very true. The many long month

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/19/07 21:57, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 21:12 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 03/19/07 18:56, Greg Folkert wrote: >> [snip] >>> Okay then, what is more bracing: >>> >>> -40 degrees Celsius >>> -40 degrees Fahrenhe

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 21:12 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 03/19/07 18:56, Greg Folkert wrote: > [snip] > > > > Okay then, what is more bracing: > > > > -40 degrees Celsius > > -40 degrees Fahrenheit > > > > Come on... I am waiting! > > Aqua Velva!!! I am more of a "Brut 33" ki

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/19/07 18:56, Greg Folkert wrote: [snip] > > Okay then, what is more bracing: > > -40 degrees Celsius > -40 degrees Fahrenheit > > Come on... I am waiting! Aqua Velva!!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/19/07 17:52, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: >> Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Heh, Texans (and for that matter, most of the desert southwest and >>> California) crack me up in thinking that they ge

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 08:37:33PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 20:29 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:56:39PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:27 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > > > > Okay then, what is more bra

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 20:29 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:56:39PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:27 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > > > > > Now _minus_ 83, now that's bracing! The high arctic is a desert too. > > > > > > Beards: th

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:56:39PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:27 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > > > Now _minus_ 83, now that's bracing! The high arctic is a desert too. > > > > Beards: them that can, grow 'em; them that can't... live in Texas? :) > > > > BLT:

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:27 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:52:09PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > >> True. So very true. The many long months of uninterrupted > > > pr

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:52:09PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > >> True. So very true. The many long months of uninterrupted > > precipitation-less heat is the one thing I dislike about living in the > >

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:09:48PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..maybe, define "just full of all sorts of conspiracy theories", I don't > watch TV, I pick my news off the web, where I try to balance Muslim, > Crusader, Commie, Jew, Asian, LatinAmerican and Norwegian news > against what I learn

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:48:35PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..Adolf Hitler has moral standing on his Führerbefehl because he put > 400,000 men on the job, to protect Norway's 3.5 Million, that's one > per 8.5 norwegian. > Adolf Hitler has moral standing? How can someone get so divorced fr

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:47:49 -0700, Paul wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in Article > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > > > I don't suppose you have ever served

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:47:49AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in Article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > I don't suppose you have ever served in the U.S. military, have you? > > There is not one military person currently serving in Iraq w

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > >Heh, Texans (and for that matter, most of the desert southwest and > >California) crack me up in thinking that they get weather more than 30 days > >out of any given year... > > Hmm. When I lived in Texas I am pr

Re: OT: sponge burning!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/18/07 21:57, Paul Scott wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:26:03AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >>> >> Are these the same Muslims who are blowing innocent men women and >> children in markets schools and other pub

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:36:12 -0400, Roberto wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:26:03AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > ..like one of either Blackwater, Halliburton or KBR? > > Or some bunches of top secret tiny wee teams of "PMC"'s? ;o) > > These bombs _are_

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:41:43 -0400, Roberto wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:57:32PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:26:03AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > Are these the same Muslims who

Re: OT: sponge burning!

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:47:49 -0700, Paul wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in Article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > I don't suppose you have ever served in the U.S. military, have you? ..no, I drew a firm line at war crime. If y

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Paul Johnson wrote: Heh, Texans (and for that matter, most of the desert southwest and California) crack me up in thinking that they get weather more than 30 days out of any given year... True. So very true. The many long months of uninterrupted precipitation-less heat is the one thing I di

Re: OT: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)

Kent West wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Paul Johnson wrote: >> You've never seen cheapo crayons (like Prang crayons) left out on a >> hot (ie over 70 degrees Fahrenheit) day >> > Ha-haa!! You North-Westerners slay me > > Hot. 70 degrees. Ha ha h

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >