Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Daniel Freedman
IIRC, I think there were also licensing issues involved with separately distributing the gecko rendering engine outside the full mozilla package. I would assume this would change once mozilla completes transition to full dual licensing under MPL and GPL. -Dan On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Daniel Reuter wr

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Florian Weimer
"Thomas J. Hamman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you want a small browser without relying on Mozilla's gecko, you > might want to try BrowseX (at www.browsex.com). > > As far as licenses go, it's free and open source, but I'm not sure if > it's Free (as in speech). The source code includes a

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:54:01AM +0100, Daniel Reuter wrote: > Hello there, > > After all this discussion recently on the list about opera for linux and > galeon/skipstone, I looked at the galeon/skipstone webpages. So a question > came to my mind: > They both use the gecko rendering engine from

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Damien
> Why don't the developers of galeon/skipstone follow this approach? > Anybody knowing of a browser doing this? mozilla is still under heavy development. it's not practical to extract gecko right now. stay tuned, though ;o) cheers -- Damien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgptjKLkVd7u4.pgp Description:

OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Daniel Reuter
Hello there, After all this discussion recently on the list about opera for linux and galeon/skipstone, I looked at the galeon/skipstone webpages. So a question came to my mind: They both use the gecko rendering engine from Mozilla. They both need a full install of Mozilla on the machine to work (